Then we have outcome-based criteria; these are participations from what we can achieve from the participations what are the outcomes it not necessary that if you follow a particular process an ideal process of participation it not necessary that it would deliver you a good outcome good effective outcome. So then outcome-based criteria we expect that what are the results expected desired results okay.

So based on that we can actually develop this framework. On the left-hand side we have process of public participation, on the right-hand side, we have outcomes of public participation like for the process of public participations we may consider early engagement of the community and representations of.

The third criteria process-based is the clear and agreed objective at the outset. Many cases that we discussed with the community but we do not have any agreed objectives, or maybe we do not have any clear objectives. It is always evolving, so it is better to make a very clear objectives.

Another one is that continued engagement of the community okay it is not that you asked them invited them to participate in the very beginning and then you forgot them. No, you should not forget them you should actually continue consultations with them involving them in every sphere of the planning process.

Fairness: fairness is a kind of component that we discussed that we are saying that okay is sometimes people participate but it is just a physical participation they do not have any power or the freedom to express their own opinions.

Then another participatory component is the power to influence the decisions we should remember that many cases people are invited, people are engaged, but maybe the financial agency the major financial resources that is coming from the external agencies.

Capacity building means that the community in order to engage with other stakeholders to negotiate with other, to bargain with other, or to involve in discussions critical discussions they should have certain knowledge or skills.

And good facilitation process; there should be enough skill like face to face and using local language not to widen the scope of the program exercise.

And then we need to incorporate local knowledge. Many cases that latent knowledge, tacit knowledge that are important. So we should try to grab that knowledge people experience, people use their experience and their traditional living with the same place that develop a knowledge.

Another one is the outcome of public participation, like participation should be successful in terms of implementations. It is not that we are making a plan we are talking and then we forgot about everything.

Transparency and accountability, like that what is the cost of the projects, who are benefiting out of it okay.

Mutual trust, that should be achieved through participations, stakeholders should believe among themselves they should be able to resolve conflict, distrust among themselves that would called an ideal participations.

Ownership feeling that when you are achieving when you are finishing some projects, the project is made for the community themselves.

Conflict resolutions, as I said that if there is a kind of distrust may not be we always be able to reach to an agreed decisions but at least one group should know that what are the concerns what are the problems there from another perspective.

And cost-effective, using local knowledge and other natural resources locally available resources and involving people their labour their roles and responsibilities would effectively reduce the cost that would be self-sustainable.