Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we will explore the concept of resilience. According to DFID, resilience is the ability of communities to manage changes caused by shocks without compromising their long-term prospects. Can anyone give me an example of what a 'shock' might look like?
Maybe an earthquake, or a drought?
Exactly! Both are significant shocks that can disrupt livelihoods. It's essential to build resilience so that communities can adapt. One way we tell that communities can handle these shocks is through their capital assets. Let's move on to what those assets are!
What types of capital are we talking about?
Great question! The framework identifies five types of capital: human, natural, social, physical, and financial. Remember this acronym 'HSN-PF' for 'Human, Social, Natural, Physical, Financial' capital. Each type plays a role in how communities enhance their resilience.
So how do these capitals work together?
They interact with each other; for example, having strong social networks can help a community to access financial resources more efficiently after a disaster. Let's summarize: resilience and capital types are crucial in DRR.
Next, let’s discuss vulnerability context. What does that term mean to you?
Does it refer to how vulnerable a community is to risks?
Very good! It includes several factors like socio-economic status, political stability, and geographical location that affect a community's ability to access their necessary resources. Can you think of examples of how these factors might play out?
Yes, in some places, poorer communities may not be able to recover as quickly from a disaster because they lack resources.
Exactly! It highlights the underlying social inequalities that factor into disaster recovery. The vulnerability context essentially sets the stage for resilience. Let’s move on to how governance plays a role in this.
Governance involves how policies influence community resource access. Can anyone think of how poor governance might affect a community's livelihood?
If the government doesn't support community projects, they might struggle to recover?
Right! Governance can either empower communities or restrict them. This leads to the importance of institutions and the processes in place. Can anyone tell me what can help improve governance?
Transparency and community engagement!
Exactly. Including the community in decision-making processes is vital for effective governance. Let's make sure to focus on that during our project cycle discussions.
The project cycle focuses on the phases in which communities can plan for disaster risk reduction. Who can remind me of these phases?
Programming, Identification, Appraisal, Financing, Implementation, and Evaluation?
Excellent recall! Let's discuss how each phase is critical. For instance, what do you think happens during the programming phase?
It sets the guidelines for how to tackle disaster risks?
That's correct! Each step builds on to ensure that we engage effectively with the needs of the community. Summarize: understanding the project cycle is key for successful DRR.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section outlines the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework developed by DFID, emphasizing the diverse forms of capital—human, natural, social, physical, and financial—that communities utilize to construct their livelihoods. It also discusses the contextual factors affecting vulnerability, resilience, and community capacities in terms of disaster risk reduction.
The Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) was conceptualized by the Department for International Development (DFID) in 1999 and serves as a guiding principle for how individuals and communities can improve and sustain their livelihoods amidst environmental stresses and shocks. Key aspects of the framework include:
The Sustainable Livelihoods Framework not only aids in assessing risks and capacities but also engages communities in a participatory approach to build resilience, ensuring that they can bounce back from shocks without compromising their long-term prospects.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The Sustainable Livelihoods Framework has been developed by DFID in 1999. It talks about the capital, referred to as an asset framework, and how individuals or communities construct their livelihoods based on various forms of capital.
This part introduces the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework created by DFID in 1999. The framework emphasizes the importance of different types of capital, which are assets that individuals or communities can use to improve their livelihoods. It highlights how these capitals interact to create opportunities for individuals and communities to enhance their living conditions.
Imagine a farmer in a small village. Their livelihood depends on various forms of capital: natural capital (the land and water), human capital (their skills and knowledge about farming), financial capital (money to buy seeds), and social capital (relationships with other farmers and buyers). By understanding and utilizing these different forms of capital, the farmer can improve their crop yield and secure a better living.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The framework discusses that sometimes human capital may be more accessible than natural capital, and how communities access and utilize these resources to sustain their livelihood opportunities.
This segment explains that communities often have varying levels of access to different types of capital, and this access can influence their ability to develop sustainable livelihoods. For instance, in some areas, individuals might find it easier to obtain education and skills (human capital) compared to accessing natural resources like water or fertile land (natural capital). This disparity can impact how effectively they can sustain their livelihoods.
Consider a community in Ghana rich in gold resources. Although the natural resource is abundant, the community may still struggle with poverty due to lacking the skills (human capital) to leverage that resource effectively. This situation illustrates the connection between different forms of capital and how they can either empower or hinder communities.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The vulnerability context affects resource access, which involves this underlying phenomenon of vulnerability and poverty. It includes considerations of infrastructure, services, governance, and cultural factors.
This portion focuses on how the vulnerability context—factors such as poverty, infrastructure, government policies, and cultural elements—plays a significant role in influencing communities’ abilities to access resources. If a community is vulnerable due to poor infrastructure or ineffective governance, their chances of securing livelihood opportunities diminish.
Think of a community that relies on fishing for livelihood. If the local government does not maintain the harbor properly (infrastructure) or if fishing quotas are unfairly distributed (governance), fishermen may struggle to make a living. The community’s vulnerability to such external factors shapes their livelihood prospects.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
DFID's resilience framework outlines the context, disturbances, and capacities to deal with stress and shocks. It emphasizes the importance of bouncing back effectively from such disturbances.
In this segment, the discussion revolves around resilience, which is defined as a community's ability to cope with stressors such as natural disasters or economic shocks while maintaining or improving their living standards. Understanding the context in which a community exists is crucial to formulating strategies for effectively addressing these shocks.
Imagine a town that faces regular floods. A resilient town would implement flood barriers, have emergency plans, and engage the community in response strategies. With these measures, when floods do occur, the town can recover quickly rather than facing a prolonged crisis.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Governance plays a crucial role in facilitating or hindering access to resources and determining the sustainability of livelihoods through policies, institutions, and community engagement.
This part discusses the significance of governance in shaping the opportunities for communities to access resources. Effective governance ensures that policies protect community interests and promote fair distribution of resources. Governance structures impact how well communities can respond to challenges in achieving sustainable livelihoods.
Consider a neighborhood that is governed by efficient leadership that promotes community gardens. This governance can provide access to land (natural capital), create community bonds (social capital), and provide the knowledge needed (human capital) to improve the neighborhood's food security and enhance living standards.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Community engagement can either be guided (manipulative) or empowerment-focused. The framework emphasizes widening community control over decision-making processes.
The final chunk highlights the importance of community engagement in decision-making related to their livelihoods. It emphasizes that genuine engagement should empower communities, moving away from manipulative approaches where external agencies dictate terms. The more control communities have over decision-making, the better they can tailor their strategies to meet their specific needs.
Imagine a community planning a new park. If outsiders make all the decisions (guided), the park may not meet community needs. However, if the community engages in discussions, shares their preferences, and collaborates on design (empowered), the park will be more beneficial and well-used.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Resilience: The capacity to recover from shocks without compromising future wellbeing.
Sustainable Livelihoods Framework: A model for understanding how different types of capital help communities withstand shocks.
Vulnerability Context: Factors affecting a community's risk exposure and resilience.
Governance: The role of policies and institutions in shaping resource management.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A community in Ghana with rich natural resources but lacking the infrastructure to use them effectively.
The role of social networks in supporting financial resilience after a disaster.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Resilience is the key, a community's shield, with capital they wielded. Fifty-fifty, their futures are sealed.
Once upon a time in a village, they learned that working together and sharing resources made them stronger against storms. With what they had—friends, nature, and government support—they built a home safe from disaster.
Use 'HNSPF' to recall the capital types: Human, Natural, Social, Physical, Financial.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Resilience
Definition:
The ability of communities to manage changes caused by shocks and stresses without compromising their long-term prospects.
Term: Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
Definition:
A framework developed by DFID that focuses on how capital assets are used by individuals and communities to build resilience.
Term: Capital Assets
Definition:
Resources that individuals or communities use to sustain their livelihoods, including human, natural, social, physical, and financial capital.
Term: Vulnerability Context
Definition:
Contextual factors, including socio-economic and political aspects, that influence a community's risk and access to resources in disaster scenarios.
Term: Governance
Definition:
The processes and institutions that shape decision-making and resource management within a community.