Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we’re discussing the nexus between disaster risk and poverty. Can anyone explain why these two are interconnected?
I think people in poverty are more vulnerable to disasters because they lack resources.
Exactly! Poverty can increase vulnerability to disasters, making effective risk management crucial. This is where frameworks like the DFID's resilience framework come in.
How does the resilience framework help with that?
It integrates livelihoods with resilience strategies, aiming to support the poorest communities. Remember the acronym *R.A.P.* - Resilience, Assets, and Planning.
What does that acronym stand for again?
R.A.P. stands for Resilience, Assets, and Planning. It highlights the holistic approach needed for effective disaster management. Let’s summarize what we’ve learned: poverty increases disaster vulnerability, and resilience frameworks are vital in addressing this issue.
Next, let’s look at community-based disaster risk management or CBDRM. *Why do you think community involvement is essential in this context?*
Communities understand their needs better, so they can create relevant solutions.
Exactly! Community involvement leverages local knowledge and resources. To remember this, think of *C.R.E.A.M.* - Community Resource Engagement in Asset Management.
What does 'asset management' mean here?
Great question! Asset management refers to identifying and utilizing local resources effectively to build resilience. To sum up this session, local networks enhance disaster management effectiveness through better resource utilization.
Now, let’s discuss case studies from Nepal. What challenges are faced regarding legal frameworks for disaster risk management?
Some bills that could help remain unpassed, keeping the community at risk.
Right! The disconnect between disaster risk management and development planning is concerning. Remember the *D.D.P.* - Disconnect in Disaster Planning.
How can that disconnect affect communities?
It hampers efforts to link disaster preparedness with sustainable development. In summary, effective legal frameworks are essential to protect communities from disasters.
Let’s move to the topic of heritage at risk, using the examples of Pitalkhora caves and Ayutthaya. Why do you think these sites are crucial to protect?
They represent our history and culture.
Correct! Protecting cultural heritage is vital. A good way to recall this is *P.H.D.* - Preservation of Heritage and Diversity.
What kind of strategies help protect these sites?
Strategies often involve geo-technological assessments and community readiness. In summary, safeguarding cultural heritage is as important as protecting communities from disasters.
Finally, let’s consider lessons learned from reconstruction efforts in places like Gibellina. What are some key takeaways?
Reconstruction needs to include community input and consider local culture.
Exactly! Successful reconstruction encompasses community engagement. You can remember this with *C.E.C.* - Community Engagement in Construction.
What about power dynamics in these efforts?
Great point! Power dynamics indeed influence reconstruction choices. To sum up this session, community involvement and awareness of power relations are crucial in successful reconstruction.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section covers the interplay between disaster risk reduction and poverty, the frameworks governing resilience, and the importance of community asset management. Case studies from Nepal and examples of cultural heritage at risk illustrate the institutional and local approaches in disaster risk management.
This section delves into community-based networks and their role in disaster risk reduction. The importance of frameworks like the Sundae and Hugo frameworks for action is emphasized as critical for outlining priorities in global disaster management efforts. Various institutions, particularly the UN, provide necessary organizational structures for these frameworks, which connect disaster management efforts with community empowerment through asset management practices.
Key concepts include Community Asset Management (CAM) and Community-Based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM), which illustrate the significance of social capital and local networks in minimizing disaster risks.
In the context of Nepal, the discussion reveals legal challenges where bills related to disaster management remain unpassed, highlighting a disconnect between disaster risk and development planning.
Examples of heritage at risk, such as the Pitalkhora caves and the city of Ayutthaya, provide case studies that illustrate how GEO-technological assessments inform disaster preparedness strategies. Discussions on the mining town of Kiruna further elucidate significant urban planning challenges related to risk mitigation. The section concludes with thoughts on reconstruction practices, drawing lessons from Gibellina and Cappadocia, emphasizing how power dynamics shape disaster recovery efforts.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We did also discuss about the community-based networks. That is where the CAM and CBDRM. So this is where the community asset management and the community base disaster risk management. So, how different social capitals and its network play an important role in reducing the disaster risk.
This chunk introduces community-based networks, which consist of two main concepts: Community Asset Management (CAM) and Community-Based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM). CAM focuses on managing and optimizing community resources to improve resilience, while CBDRM emphasizes empowering communities to prepare for and respond to disasters. The central idea is that social networks, resources, and community engagement are vital for effectively reducing disaster risks.
Imagine a neighborhood that comes together to create a community garden (CAM). They organize themselves, pooling resources like seeds and tools. This not only provides food but strengthens their connection. When a storm approaches (CBDRM), this tightly-knit group can quickly work together to secure their belongings and plan for safety, showcasing the strength of community networks.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In the case of Nepal, we also discussed about how legally that is certain things which have not been acknowledged so far. How the bills remained as a bill and how it has not been turned into an act.
This chunk highlights the legal challenges faced in Nepal regarding disaster management laws. It explains that certain proposed laws (bills) have not progressed to become actual laws (acts), leaving gaps in legal frameworks that could help with disaster risk management. Without formal legal recognition, community efforts may lack the necessary support and guidance to be effective.
Think about a proposed safety law for buildings after an earthquake that hasn’t been passed yet. Builders continue constructing without following recommended safety measures. In the same way, if disaster management laws are only bills and not acts, communities may be hindered in their ability to prepare and respond effectively to disasters.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
That is where the local disaster risk management planning guidelines you know, how it is not properly able to connect the disasters and development. So, there should be an ideally some kind of planning process which has to go within it.
This chunk emphasizes the need for better planning processes that link disaster risk management with development projects. The idea is that when communities develop infrastructure or services, they must also consider potential disaster risks associated with those developments. An effective planning process would ensure that both aspects are integrated to make communities more resilient against disasters.
Consider building a new school in a flood-prone area. If the planning team does not account for flood risks, the school could face significant damage in a disaster. Integrating disaster risk management into development planning—such as elevating the building or including flood defenses—improves safety and sustainability.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We did also discuss about various examples on heritage at risk. Like Pitalkhora caves, the rock shelters how they have been assessed with the GEO technological perspective.
This chunk mentions specific examples of cultural heritage sites, such as the Pitalkhora caves, which illustrate the importance of assessing these sites from a technological standpoint, particularly geological technologies (GEO). The goal is to understand how these structures can be affected by disasters and what measures can be taken to protect them. Assessments enable communities to identify vulnerabilities and take appropriate action.
Think of ancient ruins as treasures that need safeguarding. Just like employing security systems in a museum to protect artifacts from theft, communities can use GEO technology to monitor and protect vulnerable heritage sites from geological threats like landslides or erosion.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Sundae Framework: A global framework that prioritizes actions for disaster risk reduction.
Community Asset Management (CAM): Involves utilizing community resources strategically to strengthen disaster resilience.
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM): Empowers communities to actively engage in risk management efforts.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The Pitalkhora caves are assessed using geo-technological methods to enhance disaster response.
The city of Ayutthaya faces risks due to its historical infrastructure, calling for integrated disaster management strategies.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Communities unite, resources in sight, through storms we fight, disaster's plight.
In a village, a group came together to use local resources wisely, turning their community into a stronghold against a raging storm, illustrating the power of community asset management.
C.A.M. - Collect, Assess, Mobilize for effective disaster management.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Community Asset Management (CAM)
Definition:
A process that involves identifying, managing, and utilizing community resources to improve disaster resilience.
Term: CommunityBased Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM)
Definition:
An approach where local communities are engaged in the planning and implementation of disaster risk management strategies.
Term: UN Institutional Framework
Definition:
The organizational structure of the United Nations that provides various bodies within which disaster management frameworks operate.
Term: Sundae Framework
Definition:
A global strategy that outlines priorities for action in disaster risk reduction.
Term: DFID Resilience Framework
Definition:
A framework by the UK's Department for International Development that focuses on incorporating local livelihoods into resilience strategies.