Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we will talk about cardinality, which helps us understand how we can compare the sizes of sets. What do you think cardinality means?
Isn’t it about counting the number of elements in a set?
Exactly! Cardinality refers to how many elements a set contains. Now, can anyone tell me what it means for two sets to have the same cardinality?
It means they can be paired off one-to-one?
Right! This concept is foundational in understanding whether two infinite sets can be of the same size. Let's explore this concept further.
Now, let's discuss the Schroder-Bernstein theorem. Can anyone tell me what it states?
It says that if there are injective functions between two sets, then they have the same cardinality.
Precisely! This theorem is crucial when we want to prove two sets have the same cardinality. For example, we can demonstrate this using sets like (0,1) and (0,1]. Can anyone think of how to create injective mappings?
Could we just map each number directly as they are?
Good idea! That's an injective function because different numbers stay different. Every time we use injectivity, we're proving that the sets indeed can be paired one-to-one.
Next, let’s dive into countable and uncountable sets. Why do we care about these distinctions?
Because it helps determine how we can list the elements!
Exactly! Countable sets can be listed in a sequence, while uncountable sets cannot. For instance, can we find a countably infinite subset within an uncountable set?
Yes, like picking any real number and then removing others!
Very good! By repeatedly removing elements from an uncountable set, we can still find a countably infinite subset. Let's explore the implications of unions.
A key result is that the union of countably many countable sets is also countable. Can someone provide an example of this?
What if we take all single-element sets of natural numbers? Their union is still countable, right?
Exactly! Now, when it comes to intersections, what could happen between uncountable sets?
Their intersection could be finite! Like, if we have two intervals overlapping at a point.
Great example! So, we see unions can expand our sets, but intersections can reduce them. Let's summarize.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The chapter illustrates key properties of set cardinalities through examples and proofs, particularly involving the union of overlapping and disjoint sets. It highlights the significance of injections to establish relationships between infinite sets and concludes with practical applications in different scenarios including countable and uncountable sets.
In section 5.3, we delve into the topic of set cardinality and the implications of union operations on sets, particularly the union of countable sets. The discourse begins with an exploration of the Schroder-Bernstein theorem, which aids in proving that two sets have the same cardinality by exhibiting injective mappings between them. This is illustrated through a comparison of the sets containing real numbers within the intervals (0,1) and (0,1].
The section proceeds to clarify that if a set’s cardinality is less than or equal to the cardinality of the set of positive integers, then there exists a subset of positive integers matching that cardinality. It reinforces the assertion that there can be no infinite set whose cardinality is strictly less than that of the set of positive integers.
Additionally, the material covers the existence of countably infinite subsets within infinite sets, whether countable or uncountable, thereby emphasizing their relationship with the cardinality of positive integers. The discussion culminates in proving that unions of countable sets remain countable while exploring various conditions under which intersections of uncountable sets can yield finite, countably infinite, or uncountable results.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In question number 2 we have to prove that there is no infinite set A whose cardinality is strictly less than א. That means its cardinality is strictly less than the cardinality of set of positive integers.
This chunk discusses the concept of cardinality, particularly in relation to infinite sets. The statement asserts that if you have any infinite set A, its size (or cardinality) cannot be less than a certain value denoted as א (aleph-null), which is the cardinality of the set of positive integers. This is significant as it introduces the idea of 'smallest infinity' in set theory, indicating that some infinities can be larger than others.
Imagine a box of chocolates. If you have a finite number of chocolates, you can count them easily. Once you start making infinite boxes that each hold an infinite number of chocolates (but less than a full truckload), you still cannot have more chocolates than the total truckload which represents the cardinality of א. Just like in real life, where we can create infinitely large collections, in math, sizes of these collections can also be compared.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The first claim is that if you have any set A whose cardinality is less than equal to the cardinality of set of positive integers then you can always find a subset of the set of positive integers which has the same cardinality as your set A.
Claim 1 states that any set A that is not larger than the set of positive integers (denoted by Z+) can be equated in size to a subset of Z+. This means that if A is infinite but its size is considered 'smaller' than that of the integers, there exists some subset of the integers that can be 'matched' with the elements of A. This is key in understanding how different infinite sets compare in size.
Think of a classroom with an infinite number of desks (representing the positive integers) and a handful of students (representing set A). Each student can take a desk, and there will always be enough desks for them, even if not all desks are occupied. As long as A does not exceed the number of desks available in Z+, it can find its place within that infinite set.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Claim 2 is that any subset of the set of positive integers is either finite or has the same cardinality as א.
Claim 2 asserts that any subset of Z+ either would be finite or would have a size (or cardinality) that is equivalent to א (aleph-null), meaning it has an infinite size. This helps establish a clear understanding of the nature of subsets: they either remain countably finite or become countably infinite. It emphasizes that when dealing with the infinite subset of integers, one cannot form a set that is 'in between' finite and infinite.
Consider a bookcase filled with books (Z+) where each shelf represents a finite count of books laid out in order. A specific shelf will either have a few books (finite) or be filled with an endless number of books (like the infinite collection of the same author). If you were to take only certain shelves (subsets), you find they either hold a few books or a whole series of endless books—never something in between.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now by applying claim 1 on that set A we also know that there exist some subset B of the set of positive integers whose cardinality is the same as the cardinality of your A set.
Here, the proof uses contradiction to show that assuming the existence of an infinite set A with cardinality less than that of Z+ leads to an inconsistency. By assuming there exists a subset B of integers that can match A's size, it can be shown that if A is infinite, so must B be, hence leading to a violation of the assumption that A is less than Z+. It highlights a crucial principle in mathematical proofs involving infinite sets.
Imagine you claimed to have a limited number of students in a class (infinite set A), but then you realize this means there are more students to suit every desk in the classroom than you thought. It shows the impossibility of ‘more’ students fitting into the limited school property when you have to assign desks. Therefore, some contradictions force you to reconsider that perhaps your initial numbers weren’t accurate.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In each step in each iteration the arbitrarily element which I am picking from the left over set if I list it out, if I list down all those elements, then that sequence of the elements will be or the set of those elements which I am picking in each iteration from the left over set will of course be a subset of my original set.
This concept revolves around the idea of creating a sequence by iteratively selecting elements from set A, continually demonstrating that what remains is also infinite. By selecting elements recursively, one can form a new infinite subset. This not only illustrates the infinite nature of A but also provides a mechanism to assign cardinality to the whole set including A.
Imagine a candy factory where every time you pick a piece of candy (element from A), the factory produces more. As you take candy, more are constantly created. The moment you think you have taken all candies (removed the last of A), the factory has infinitely supplied you with another batch, assuring you always have an infinite number to choose from, thus keeping the candy supply (set A) endlessly available.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Injective Functions: Map distinct elements of one set to distinct elements of another, crucial for comparing set sizes.
Countable Sets: Can be listed in a sequence, allowing a correspondence with natural numbers.
Uncountable Sets: Cannot be put into a sequence corresponding to natural numbers, indicating a larger infinity.
Union of Sets: Combines elements from both sets, potentially increasing cardinality.
Intersection of Sets: Identifies common elements, usually reducing the size of the resultant set.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The set of all even numbers is countable, while the set of all real numbers is uncountable.
The sets [0,1] and (0,1) show how unions and the inclusion-exclusion principle affect cardinalities.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When sets join and overlap, unions make a greater map; intersections find what's shared, counting's how sizes are bared.
Imagine two families merging their address books (unions) while some relatives have the same name (intersections) - they take stock of everyone.
Countable means you can call them all, think of lining up against the wall, if you can't count them, they're uncountable at all.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Cardinality
Definition:
A measure of the number of elements in a set.
Term: Injective function
Definition:
A function that maps distinct elements of one set to distinct elements of another.
Term: Countable set
Definition:
A set that can be put into one-to-one correspondence with the set of natural numbers.
Term: Uncountable set
Definition:
A set that cannot be put into one-to-one correspondence with the set of natural numbers.
Term: Union of sets
Definition:
The set that contains all elements from both sets.
Term: Intersection of sets
Definition:
The set that contains all elements common to both sets.