Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start with two important terms: Potential Evapotranspiration, or PET, and Actual Evapotranspiration, AET. Who can tell me what PET is?
I think it's the maximum amount of water that can evaporate if there’s unlimited water available?
Exactly! PET represents that maximum potential moisture loss. Now, how does AET compare?
AET is the actual amount of water lost, right? Like, how much water is really evaporating based on what’s available.
Correct! AET varies based on actual soil moisture levels. Here's a memory aid: Think of PET as 'Perfect Evapotranspiration' and AET as 'Actual Evapotranspiration' — one is theoretical, while the other is real!
So, AET is always less than or equal to PET?
Right. Great point! Let's summarize: PET is the potential, and AET is what actually happens based on current conditions.
Now, let’s discuss two important conditions: water-limited and energy-limited conditions. What occurs during water-limited conditions?
In water-limited conditions, AET is less than PET because there's not enough water in the soil.
Exactly! AET is restricted by drought or insufficient moisture. On the contrary, what happens in energy-limited conditions?
AET is almost equal to PET here, right? Because there’s enough water but limited energy — like sunlight.
Spot on! Remember: energy-limited conditions can still allow for high rates of AET if water is available. A way to distinguish this is to think: 'Water shortage means less evaporation, but energy limits don’t!'.
Would that be important in understanding climate changes?
Absolutely! Understanding these conditions helps in predicting how climate factors influence water cycles. Let’s recap: water-limited AET < PET, while energy-limited AET ≈ PET.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on the definitions of actual and potential evapotranspiration, highlighting the contrasting conditions under which these processes occur. It explains water-limited and energy-limited conditions and how they affect the amount of water vapor released from soil and plants, all while contextualizing the significance of AET in hydrology and agriculture.
Actual evapotranspiration (AET) is a crucial process in the hydrologic cycle, representing the actual volume of water released to the atmosphere through evaporation and transpiration under present environmental conditions. This section distinguishes AET from potential evapotranspiration (PET) — the maximal amount of evapotranspiration under unlimited water supply circumstances.
In hydrology and water resources engineering, comprehensively understanding and estimating AET is essential for effective irrigation planning, water resource management, and assessing crop water needs. This section lays the groundwork for further exploration of factors, methods of measurement, and the applications of AET in various fields.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Potential Evapotranspiration (PET): The evapotranspiration that would occur with unlimited water supply.
Actual Evapotranspiration (AET): The real evapotranspiration that occurs given the actual moisture availability in the root zone.
Evapotranspiration refers to the process of water vapor being transferred from the soil and plants to the atmosphere. There are two concepts: Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) and Actual Evapotranspiration (AET). PET represents the maximum amount of evapotranspiration that could occur if there were no limitations on water supply; it assumes an unlimited availability of water. In contrast, AET considers the actual conditions present, meaning it measures the evapotranspiration that occurs with the real amount of water available in the soil. If the soil is dry, AET will be lower than PET.
Think of PET as a sponge that can hold a large amount of water but is only partially filled. If you pour water into the sponge (representing an unlimited supply), it can absorb all that water. AET, however, is like the sponge with water already in it; it can only absorb more up to its current capacity. When the sponge (or soil) runs dry, it can only 'evaporate' water that is already there, which is less than its potential capacity.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In water-limited conditions, AET < PET due to insufficient soil moisture.
In energy-limited conditions, AET ≈ PET as water is available but energy (e.g., solar radiation) limits evapotranspiration.
Evapotranspiration can be influenced by two main constraints: water and energy. In water-limited conditions, there isn’t enough soil moisture available for the plants to use, thus the actual evapotranspiration (AET) is less than the potential evapotranspiration (PET). On the other hand, in energy-limited conditions, although there is adequate water in the soil, there may not be enough energy (for instance, sunshine) to evaporate that water effectively. In such cases, AET is approximately equal to PET because the lack of energy cap limits how much water can evaporate even though there is sufficient moisture.
Imagine you're trying to cook pasta (evapotranspiration) but you only have a small amount of water left in the pot (water-limited condition). You can only cook a little pasta because you don't have enough water. Now, if you have plenty of water but you're using a very weak stove (energy-limited condition), you won't be able to boil the water quickly even though you have enough of it. In both cases, the actual cooking (evapotranspiration) is restricted, either by water shortage or lack of energy.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Evaporation: The conversion of water into vapor from various surfaces.
Transpiration: The release of water vapor by plants through stomata.
Water-Limited Conditions: Scenarios where soil moisture is insufficient, resulting in AET < PET.
Energy-Limited Conditions: Conditions characterized by available water but limited solar energy, leading to AET ≈ PET.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In a drought-prone area, plants may only use a fraction of the potential water available for evapotranspiration, showing water-limited conditions.
During the summer with ample rain, AET may closely match PET due to abundant water and sufficient solar energy.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Evaporation's evaporation, transpiration's from the plant, both together play their part, actual water is the chant.
Imagine a gardener in summer. With a bucket of water (PET), she waters lush plants (AET), those that drink deeply and thrive even under the sun.
Remember AET = Actual, where soil must be factual, versus PET = Potential, the max that could be sequential.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Evapotranspiration
Definition:
The combined process of evaporation and transpiration, denoting the total water vapor lost to the atmosphere from soil and plant surfaces.
Term: Potential Evapotranspiration (PET)
Definition:
The amount of water that would evaporate and transpire if there were no limitations on water supply.
Term: Actual Evapotranspiration (AET)
Definition:
The quantity of water actually lost to the atmosphere, reflecting real moisture availability.
Term: WaterLimited Conditions
Definition:
Situations where actual evapotranspiration is less than potential due to insufficient soil moisture.
Term: EnergyLimited Conditions
Definition:
Conditions under which AET approaches PET because of adequate water supply but limited solar energy.