Practice Young Generation - 9.6.1 | 9. Memory Management and Garbage Collection | Advance Programming In Java
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the purpose of the Eden space in the Young Generation?

💡 Hint: Think about where new objects go when they are created.

Question 2

Easy

How does minor garbage collection benefit Java applications?

💡 Hint: Consider memory utilization.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What area do new objects get allocated in Java?

  • Heap
  • Stack
  • Young Generation
  • Permanent Generation

💡 Hint: Think about where Java stores new instances.

Question 2

Minor garbage collection occurs in which area?

  • Eden space
  • Old generation
  • Permanent generation
  • Method area

💡 Hint: Identify where new objects start their lifecycle.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Evaluate the effectiveness of different garbage collection strategies in managing memory in large Java applications. Discuss the implications for memory leaks.

💡 Hint: Think about the roles of Eden, Survivor spaces, and GC efficiency.

Question 2

Design a monitoring plan for a Java application to minimize memory leaks related to the Young Generation. What tools and methods will you employ?

💡 Hint: Reflect on the available JVM tools for memory analysis.

Challenge and get performance evaluation