Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skillsβperfect for learners of all ages.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Welcome back, everyone! Today, we will explore feedback systems in amplifiers, particularly how they affect frequency response.
What does feedback do to an amplifier's performance?
Great question! Feedback can either enhance the stability and bandwidth or lead to instability if not correctly implemented. Remember, feedback can be negative, which typically stabilizes the system.
So, negative feedback is good for stability?
Exactly! Think of it as a stabilizing force. Negative feedback reduces gain but increases bandwidth. We often summarize this as 'Stability through Feedback.'
What happens if we have more than one pole?
Excellent point! The presence of multiple poles complicates the frequency response, and that's what we'll address next. Let's dive into that!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
As we move forward, let's discuss the shifting of poles when feedback is applied to an amplifier with two poles.
What causes the poles to shift?
The shift occurs due to the interaction of the gain with the feedback factor, denoted as A and B2. When we apply feedback, the effective pole locations are altered.
Can you explain how this affects the system's stability?
Sure! If the feedback moves the poles too close to the imaginary axis in the s-plane, it can lead to instability. Think of it as 'Pole movement: the closer, the riskier.'
How do we calculate the new pole locations?
Great follow-up! Weβll derive expressions based on the original pole locations adjusted by the feedback factor. It's a key skill to master!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let's analyze how feedback influences gain in amplifiers with two poles.
So, the feedback changes our low-frequency gain?
Exactly! The low-frequency gain remains defined, but as feedback is applied, we need to account for the loop gain, which modifies our effective gain.
What do we mean by loop gain again?
Loop gain is the product of the forward gain A and the feedback factor B2. It's crucial for understanding how feedback modifies our system's behavior.
So, if the loop gain increases, we have better stability?
That's correct, but be mindful of our pole positions. Too high a loop gain can also lead to phase shifts which could destabilize the system.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now let's talk about Bode plots which visually portray our gain and phase responses.
What does the Bode plot tell us about our amplifier?
The Bode plot offers insights into gain decreases at higher frequencies and how phase shifts at our poles impact system performance. It's a powerful analysis tool.
So, it shows how gain falls off?
Exactly. For every pole, we typically observe a -20 dB/decade roll-off. Let's visualize this to understand the concept better!
And it helps us understand our systemβs stability?
Yes! The locations of the poles in the Bode plot correlate strongly with system behavior. Understand this, and you'll excel in feedback systems.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
In this section, the focus is on analyzing how feedback affects the frequency response of amplifiers with two poles. The discussion includes key concepts related to pole locations, stability, and the impact of negative feedback on amplifier performance.
In this section titled Case II: Two Poles, the effect of feedback networks on the frequency response of amplifiers is examined, specifically focusing on configurations where amplifiers have two poles. The discussion revolves around the dynamics of feedback systems, particularly negative feedback, and how it alters the pole positions in the context of transfer functions.
Through mathematical derivations and graphical illustrations, this chapter serves as a foundational piece in understanding amplifier design and feedback implementation in analog electronic circuits.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In this case, we consider A is having two poles namely p1 and p2. We can see what is the corresponding location of the pole of the feedback system. Here again, we consider it is βve feedback system in DC condition Ξ² also remaining independent of frequency and the forward amplifier it is having two poles p1 and p2.
In this section, we examine a scenario involving an amplifier that has two distinct poles, denoted as p1 and p2. The analysis assumes that the feedback system operates under negative feedback conditions in a direct current (DC) state. We also indicate that the feedback factor (Ξ²) remains constant with respect to frequency. Understanding the effects of these two poles will provide insights into how feedback alters the amplifier's performance in various frequency domains.
Think of a two-pole feedback system like a seesaw with two weights on board. Each weight represents a pole; the placement and mass of each weight will affect how the seesaw moves (i.e., the overall system response). When feedback is applied, it's similar to someone pushing down on one side of the seesaw, changing how the seesaw balances and swings.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The location of the p2 is not only much higher than p1 magnitude-wise, but let us consider p1(1 + Ξ²A) is also lower than p2; which means, we are expecting this p1 will be getting shifted by this factor and probably this will be the shifted version of p1.
Here, the analysis elaborates on the relationship between the two poles p1 and p2 in the system. It states that pole p2 is at a higher frequency than p1, and when we apply feedback, we expect the first pole (p1) will shift due to the factor (1 + Ξ²A). Essentially, this indicates that feedback influences the position of the poles, leading to changes in system behavior at different frequencies. This shifting is crucial when analyzing the stability and the performance of the amplifier.
Imagine driving on two parallel roads, where the lower road represents p1 and the upper road represents p2. If the lower road (p1) begins to incline due to added feedback (like pressure from a heavy load on a vehicle), you'd expect it to rise slightly but remain lower than the upper road (p2). This change illustrates how the feedback can alter the characteristics of the system's response in a comparable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
To start with, again let us consider A and the expression of A is given here. The numerator is A and in the denominator what we get is (1 + Ξ²A)i. This part if I put it here, then from this denominator this factor and this factor are getting cancelled here.
This chunk introduces the transfer function associated with the feedback system having two poles. It highlights that the transfer function can be simplified by examining the relationship between the numerator and the denominator. When we derive this function, specific terms in the denominator are cancelled out, which ultimately helps in formulating the feedback behavior more straightforwardly. Recognizing how to manipulate the transfer function is essential for determining the amplifierβs frequency response and improving performance.
Consider making a smoothie where the ingredients (the numerator) blend together smoothly with the liquid base (the denominator). If the blender's power (feedback) is too high, it might cause the base to swirl effectively, allowing the ingredients to mix better than if it were moving too slowly. This analogy illustrates how feedback can enhance or modify the output of a system.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, this updated pole and this is also updated pole and interestingly this is we call say pβ² which is the case similar to a single pole situation. And then p2 may say that now this is a pole second pole of the A which is again approximately equal to p2.
After applying feedback to the transfer function, the analysis indicates that the poles of the feedback system exhibit behaviors akin to a single pole system. The pole p1 is substantially impacted and adjusted to a new pole, designated as pβ², while the second pole p2 remains approximately equal in position. This outcome highlights the feedbackβs significant role in reshaping the amplifier's dynamic characteristics, influencing its stability and frequency response profile.
Imagine tuning a musical instrument; as you twist a knob (feedback), one string immediately resonates correctly (shifts to pβ²), while another string stays roughly the same (remains as p2). The adjustment illustrates how feedback can fine-tune a system's responses while leaving other aspects unchanged.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In summary we can say that A shows the approximation we do have and this helps me for the factorization, and as I said that pβ² is approximately equal to p1. This approximation indicates that one of these two poles remains the same, while the other shifts and potentially affects system dynamics.
In conclusion, the section reviews the results of the feedback analysis, particularly focusing on the close approximation of one of the poles (p') remaining largely unchanged compared to its original position (p1). This approximation allows us to maintain a clearer understanding of the system's dynamics and facilitates the factorization of the transfer function for easier analysis. The transformations of these poles are further illustrated through Bode plots, showcasing how the visual representation aligns with our theoretical predictions.
Returning to our earlier analogy of the seesaw, we can visualize the transformed system by recognizing that while one weight remains in place, another has adjusted. The seesaw now balances differently, representing how feedback effectively reshapes system dynamics while maintaining certain stabilizing features.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Negative Feedback: Reduces gain and increases stability.
Pole Shifting: Essential for determining amplifier behavior under feedback.
Loop Gain: Key factor affecting overall system responsiveness.
Phase Shift: Influences system stability and performance.
Bode Plot: Effective tool for analyzing frequency response.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example: In an amplifier with two poles at different frequencies, applying feedback could shift their locations to improve stability.
Example: A Bode plot that shows gain dropping with frequency can help identify critical bandwidth and phase margin.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Feedback helps to stabilize, in amplifiers it plays, reducing gain while keeping woes at bay.
Once in a lab, a young engineer named Alice used feedback to tame a wild amplifier, simply by adjusting the poles' positions, making it stable and powerful.
Remember 'PALS' (Poles Affect Loop Stability) to grasp how pole shifting impacts stability.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Feedback System
Definition:
A system that utilizes feedback to adjust its output to achieve desired objectives.
Term: Poles
Definition:
Values in the s-plane that determine the stability and dynamic characteristics of a control system.
Term: Loop Gain
Definition:
The product of the forward gain and the feedback factor, indicating system responsiveness.
Term: Frequency Response
Definition:
The measure of an amplifier's output spectrum in relation to its input spectrum at varied frequencies.
Term: Stability
Definition:
A characteristic of a system indicating that it will return to equilibrium after a disturbance.