Practice Confusion Matrix - 12.5.C | 12. Model Evaluation and Validation | Data Science Advance
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

Define True Positives.

💡 Hint: Think about what happens when the model gets a positive case right.

Question 2

Easy

What does a False Positive indicate?

💡 Hint: Consider the mistakes a model could make in predictions.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does a confusion matrix help to visualize?

  • Classification results
  • Regression results
  • Data pre-processing

💡 Hint: Think about what category of models uses confusion matrices.

Question 2

True or False: True Negatives (TN) indicates correct predictions of negative cases.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider how the terms are defined.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

You are tasked with improving a classification model for a credit approval system. The confusion matrix shows high false negatives. Discuss strategies to reduce them and enhance the model's recall.

💡 Hint: Consider aspects of model training and evaluation.

Question 2

Given a confusion matrix with TP = 40, FP = 25, FN = 15, and TN = 20, calculate precision, recall, and the F1 Score. Discuss how these metrics could inform model improvement.

💡 Hint: Make sure to follow through the calculations accurately.

Challenge and get performance evaluation