Increased Design Complexity
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Increased Design Complexity
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we're discussing the concept of increased design complexity in the context of BIST. Can anyone tell me what they think this means?
Does it mean that adding BIST makes the circuit more complicated?
Exactly! Integrating BIST means including additional circuitry for self-testing. This adds layers of complexity.
So, does that mean it takes longer to design a circuit with BIST?
Yes, it can. The extra components need careful planning, which can lengthen design time. Remember the acronym 'BIST'—'B' for 'Built-in', 'I' for 'Increased', 'S' for 'Self-testing', and 'T' for 'Time-consuming'.
What about the size and power? Do they also get affected?
Great question! The increased number of components can lead to larger circuit sizes and higher power consumption. Balancing performance and complexity is key here.
So, are there specific faults that BIST can't catch because of this complexity?
Yes, that’s correct! While BIST is excellent for common faults, its design might miss more complex or unique faults. This balance is crucial.
To summarize, while BIST offers great advantages, it can complicate design by adding components, lengthening the design time, and potentially affecting power and size.
Challenges in Fault Coverage
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let’s delve deeper into fault coverage within BIST. Why is it important for BIST systems?
It's important because we want to catch as many faults as possible, right?
Exactly right! High fault coverage ensures system reliability. However, as complexity increases, so does the challenge of detecting diverse fault types.
What about stuck-at faults? Can BIST easily catch those?
Yes! BIST is effective for stuck-at faults. But detecting more complicated faults, like transition or delay faults, requires carefully crafted test patterns.
Are there cases where we might not be able to detect unknown faults?
Absolutely. Unaccounted fault types pose a challenge. Designing test patterns to encompass potential unknown faults is crucial for robust BIST systems.
To summarize, while BIST enhances fault detection, the complexity can hinder the catch of various fault types, especially the unpredictable ones.
Evaluating Trade-offs
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now that we understand the complexities, let's evaluate the trade-offs involved in implementing BIST. What trade-offs do you think engineers face?
The costs of additional components and testing time?
Correct! The cost of additional components and design complexity often means a trade-off between thorough testing and resource management.
And there's also the consideration of performance, right?
Yes, performance can be impacted since additional logic dictates part of the overall circuit’s operation. It’s a balancing act.
Are there best practices for minimizing these complexities?
One approach is to optimize the BIST logic carefully. Designers often have to prototype and simulate different configurations to find the sweet spot.
In summary, integrating BIST poses trade-offs in cost, performance, and testing capabilities, requiring careful evaluation by engineers.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
This section discusses how integrating BIST logic can complicate circuit designs by adding extra components, thereby increasing design time, size, and possibly power consumption. It also explores the challenges of ensuring comprehensive fault coverage for complex or atypical faults.
Detailed
Detailed Summary
Increased design complexity is a notable limitation of Built-In Self-Test (BIST) techniques. While BIST systems enhance diagnostic capabilities and offer several advantages, the integration of self-testing circuits directly into electronic systems complicates the overall design. This section elaborates on the following critical points:
- Additional Components: BIST requires the inclusion of extra circuitry specifically for testing purposes. This incremental complexity can lead to longer design times as engineers must carefully plan and implement the test logic alongside the primary operational components.
- Impacts on Size and Power Consumption: As more components are incorporated into the design, both the physical size of the circuit and its power requirements may increase. Engineers must balance the advantages of self-testing with these potential drawbacks.
- Emerging Challenges: The increased complexity doesn’t just refer to physical components but also extends to the design challenges of ensuring comprehensive fault coverage. While BIST excels at identifying common faults, more complex or non-typical faults—especially in analog or mixed-signal systems—may not be effectively detected. Designers must optimize BIST systems to maximize fault coverage without significantly complicating the overall design.
Overall, while the complex integration of BIST enhances the testability of circuits, it requires careful consideration of the associated challenges.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to Design Complexity
Chapter 1 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Integrating BIST logic into the design of the system adds extra complexity to the circuit, requiring additional components and test circuitry.
Detailed Explanation
When designing a system that incorporates Built-In Self-Test (BIST) functionality, additional logic and components must be integrated into the original design. This means that engineers need to incorporate circuits that can generate test patterns, analyze the outputs, and effectively handle these additional operations without interfering with the core functions of the main system. As a result, this can lead to more complicated designs that might require more resources in terms of design and manufacturing.
Examples & Analogies
Think of designing a house. If you include an automated security system into the construction plans, it requires not just the basic structure but also new wiring, sensors, and programming for the system to function. The original design gets more complicated because of the added complexity, much like adding BIST to an electronic circuit.
Impact on Design Time
Chapter 2 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
This increased complexity can increase the design time and potentially impact the size or power consumption of the system.
Detailed Explanation
As designers work to integrate BIST into a system, they may need to spend more time in the planning and implementation phases. This added time is often necessary to ensure that all parts of the system can work together efficiently. Additionally, incorporating extra components can lead to a larger physical product, which may also affect how much power the system uses, as additional circuitry often requires more energy to operate.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine upgrading your laptop with a new high-performance graphics card. It may require more time to fit in, ensure compatibility, and adjust power settings. Similarly, adding BIST increases the complexity of the electronic design, affecting time, size, and power consumption.
Trade-offs of Integration
Chapter 3 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
While BIST aims to enhance testing capabilities, the additional components and circuitry may lead to potential challenges.
Detailed Explanation
BIST is beneficial for automating tests, but the trade-off is that it possesses its own challenges. These challenges often include the need for more sophisticated design techniques, which may demand specialized knowledge and resources that some teams may find difficult to acquire. Additionally, extra components might introduce their own faults or inefficiencies, making it essential for teams to balance the benefits of BIST with any potential drawbacks.
Examples & Analogies
Consider adding new features to a smartphone. While new software capabilities can enhance the phone's functionality, they often require more memory and processing power. This can slow down the device or lead to bugs, similar to how adding BIST can improve test coverage but complicate the overall design.
Key Concepts
-
Increased Design Complexity: Refers to the additional components and circuits necessary for BIST integration, leading to extended design effort.
-
Fault Detection Limitations: Highlights that while BIST is effective at detecting common faults, its complexity can impede the detection of atypical faults.
-
Design Trade-Offs: Discusses how engineers must balance increased testing capabilities against design complexity, performance, and cost.
Examples & Applications
Example of a microprocessor designed with BIST where additional circuitry results in size inflation but enhances self-testing capabilities.
An automotive circuit using BIST that can diagnose its own faults immediately but requires significant power and design time for implementation.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Design complexity, don't let it mislead, BIST in your circuit, is what you need!
Stories
Imagine an engineer who builds a bridge. Every added support beam makes it stronger, but it also takes more time to plan and build. Similarly, adding BIST makes circuits stronger but more complex.
Memory Tools
Remember BIST as 'Better Integrated Self-Test' - it highlights how BIST enhances testing but adds complexity.
Acronyms
Use 'COST' for remembering the trade-offs
= Complexity
= Overheads
= Size increase
= Time for design.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- BuiltIn SelfTest (BIST)
A technique for embedding self-testing capabilities directly within electronic systems to facilitate diagnostics.
- Fault Coverage
The extent to which a testing method can detect faults in a circuit or system.
- StuckAt Fault
A type of fault where a node in a digital circuit remains at a constant logic level regardless of inputs.
- Transition Fault
Errors that occur when a signal fails to change states as expected.
- Delay Fault
A fault involving a delay in the signal's propagation time beyond acceptable thresholds.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.