Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome everyone! Today, we'll discuss the 6W Framework, which helps us understand the need for adapting to climate change and disaster risks. Let’s start by discussing why adaptation is essential. Can anyone tell me why we need to focus on adaptation?
I think it’s important because disasters can have long-term impacts on communities.
Exactly! Disasters like droughts are not just short-term events; they have prolonged effects. Remember the acronym 'RAGE' for Risk Awareness and Global Exploration of adaptation strategies!
Could you explain more about what adaptation is?
Certainly! Adaptation refers to the process of adjusting to new conditions, especially in the context of climate change impacts. It can involve changing practices, policies, or structures.
What do we adapt to exactly?
Great question! We adapt to various climate-related risks, such as increased flooding or drought. Let’s remember the mnemonic 'ADApt' - Adapt on demand anytime!
Now, let’s look at how discussions around climate change have evolved over the years. Initially, in the 1980s, the focus was primarily on greenhouse gas emissions. Why do you think that was?
I guess it was the start of understanding the environmental impact.
Correct! As we moved into the 2000s, the conversation broadened to include social dimensions. Can someone explain what this social dimension means?
It probably relates to how different communities are affected by climate change.
Exactly! We began recognizing climate change as a question of social justice as well. Remember the acronym 'JUST' - Justice for Underrepresented Social Transformations.
An important aspect discussed in the 6W Framework is the integration of macro-level knowledge with micro-level data. What do you think are the challenges here?
There might be differences in data quality or availability.
Good point! Knowledge mismatches at different levels can hinder effective adaptation. Let's remember 'C-LINK' - Communicate and Link Integrated Knowledge!
How can we create a clearer roadmap for integration?
Creating better collaboration and communication platforms among agencies is key. This brings us to the importance of shared understanding.
Next, let's discuss the spatial and temporal challenges. How do you see these impacting disaster risk reduction?
Spatial challenges might be related to different geographical areas affected by climate change.
Precisely! And temporal challenges relate to how we address risks short-term versus long-term. Can anyone think of an example of adapting to a long-term risk?
Maybe planting trees to combat droughts that will eventually come?
Exactly right! Let's remember 'TREE' - Time for Resilient Environmental Engagement!
Finally, as we wrap up, what are some principles or criteria we should consider for effective adaptation?
I think we should focus on collaboration and community engagement.
Absolutely! Collaboration is crucial. Let's use the mnemonic 'COLLAB' - Collaborate, Listen, Learn, Adapt, Build!
So, all these elements come together to create a holistic adaptation strategy?
Yes, indeed! Remember, it’s about integrating knowledge, fostering cooperation, and addressing the needs of different communities!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section discusses the evolution of perspectives on climate change from focusing on greenhouse gas emissions to incorporating social dimensions and justice issues. It introduces the 6W Framework, which outlines critical questions regarding adaptation to disaster risks while addressing the integration of macro- and micro-level knowledge datasets.
The 6W Framework outlines a comprehensive approach to climate change adaptation, emphasizing the importance of integrating various dimensions, including spatial and temporal scales. It delineates the progression of climate change discussions from environmental issues in the 1980s to global justice and legislative norms in the 2000s. The framework addresses the need for legislative, cultural, and behavioral norms to support societal functioning in relation to environmental interactions while highlighting the significance of collaboration and transparent communication among different stakeholders. This integrated approach considers the disparities in data and knowledge across various scales of impacts and seeks to create a roadmap for effective integration of Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR).
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Where we have also the knowledge mismatches in the norms when we talk about the climate change, it was when it was discussed in the 80s which was the first era from 80s to 2002 it was mostly focused on the greenhouse gas emissions. Where the most of the scientific community are involved, it is an environmental problem. Whereas in the second era from 2000s this has been seen by the International agenda, and also the social dimension come into the picture where the social scientists and the development workers have increased their cooperation in the second era. In the third era it also looks from the you know this has been felt by other countries and other regions. So this is become a question of global justice in the near future that is where the legal dimension came in third era.
In the 1980s, the primary focus of climate change discussions was on greenhouse gas emissions, viewed largely as an environmental issue. Moving into the 2000s, climate change began to be recognized globally, incorporating social aspects and increasing collaboration between scientists and development workers. By the third era, climate change was acknowledged not just as an environmental challenge, but as a matter of global justice, thus introducing a legal context that emphasized normative frameworks with the aim of guiding society towards sustainable practices.
Think of climate change like a huge, complex puzzle. In the 1980s, we were just focused on the big pieces (like emissions), whereas in the 2000s, we started to notice how those pieces connected to smaller ones (like social impacts), and by now we recognize it's not just about fitting the pieces together, but about making sure everyone can play and access the puzzle table.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
This is where we need to talk about develop of certain legislative cultural and behavioral norms which determine the functioning of human society and how the interactions between nature and society were created. So many of these legislative norms were often violated in the context of informal and coastal settlements. For example, the coastal regulation zone which was formed in 1991 and revised 19 times until the tsunami have struck. But then they were barely implemented.
To address climate change effectively, it is vital to develop and adhere to legislative, cultural, and behavioral norms that guide society's interactions with nature. However, many existing laws, especially those related to coastal regulations formed in 1991, were not implemented effectively, especially in informal settlements, leading to further vulnerabilities to environmental disasters. This points to a disconnect between legislation and its practical application.
Imagine a neighborhood with a community garden. The gardeners create rules on watering and sharing fruits, but if those rules are not followed, the garden suffers. Similarly, laws about coastal settlements may exist, but if they aren’t enforced, the environmental damage continues, putting the community at risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Also the knowledge mismatches when we talk about different scales, different data sets, different climate and risk scientist’s practitioners which they do not bring the transparent communication and collaboration and joint programming between various levels of actor’s, institutions, and agencies. So there is all this actually leads towards an important question of how to use this macro-level knowledge data sets to inform the micro-level data sets.
Knowledge gaps exist when different scientists and practitioners deal with varying scales and types of climate data without effective communication. This lack of transparency and collaboration between actors at different levels of government and institutions raises a critical question of how to connect broader, macro-level climate data with localized, micro-level data for effective climate action.
Consider a teacher who has a curriculum that addresses global issues like climate change but teaches them without connecting to local examples, like community recycling programs. The students might understand the concept at a big-picture level but struggle to see its relevance in their own lives. Bridging that gap is essential for true understanding and action.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So for this Lei and Wang they actually come up with more explicit frameworks they call about “6w framework”. So they talk about why adaptation is needed for natural disaster risk, what is adaptation to disaster risk, and adapt to what, who has to adapt?. Who should adopt? How to adapt? What are the possible principles or criteria to assist effectiveness of adaptation?
The 6W Framework proposed by Lei and Wang addresses critical questions regarding disaster risk adaptation. It explores why adaptation is necessary, what adaptation entails, the target population for adaptation, the methods of implementation, and the principles that can guide effective adaptation efforts. This framework serves as a structured approach for understanding and planning adaptation strategies in the face of climate-related risks.
Think of the 6W Framework like a recipe for baking a cake: it outlines the reasons (why), the ingredients (what), the bakers (who), the method (how), and the best practices for success (principles). Just as following a recipe ensures a tasty cake, applying the 6Ws ensures a thorough approach to disaster risk adaptation.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So it is where in my current ongoing study I developed this framework where we have the spatial dimension and which has also the vulnerability in impacting on these, and there is also the adaptation process both pre-disaster in disaster post-disaster and the future risk which has a short-term and medium-term of single and multiple disasters. And this has a long-term adaptation through social learning.
The framework recognizes the importance of spatial dimensions and vulnerability in the adaptation process, addressing changes before, during, and after disasters. It emphasizes that adaptation is not just a reaction but involves learning over time, adjusting practices based on previous experiences and changing conditions. This is crucial for fostering resilience in communities facing multiple disaster risks.
Picture a teacher who continually adjusts their lessons based on student feedback and test results. This 'learning from experience' enhances their teaching. In the same way, communities need to adapt by learning from past disasters, making necessary changes to become more resilient in the future.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And this also talks about how the adaptive built environments open up choices, connect past and future, and how it can reintegrate the humans in nature for which cooperation coordination between various agencies political, technological, ecological, educational and as well as the participation and communication across various segments the global actors in the National.
The adaptive built environments framework emphasizes the need for various sectors—political, ecological, educational, and technological—to work together to develop sustainable and resilient practices. It underlines how integrating human and natural systems offers flexible choices and fosters cooperation, which is essential for thriving in a world fraught with disaster risks.
Imagine a concert where musicians from different backgrounds come together to create beautiful music. For this harmony to happen, they need to communicate and collaborate effectively. Similarly, creating resilient communities requires different sectors to synchronize their efforts and work towards a common goal of sustainability.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Micro-Level and Macro-Level Data: Integration of various levels of data is essential for effective adaptation.
Legislative and Cultural Norms: Norms must be aligned to support disaster resilience.
Social Dimensions: Climate change issues include not just environmental factors but social justice as well.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Overall adaptation strategies in coastal areas that involve community engagement and ecosystem restoration.
Legislative frameworks that have been revised repeatedly but inadequately enforced in informal settlements.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To save ourselves from nature’s wrath, we must adapt and choose our path.
Once in a village affected by floods, the villagers came together and created binding safety norms around their homes. They learned to adapt their houses using sustainable practices, all thanks to the virtues of cooperation.
'ADAPT' stands for Awareness, Decision-making, Action, Participation, and Transformation.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Definition:
Adjusting practices, processes, and structures to minimize damage from climate change impacts.
Term: Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Definition:
Strategies aimed at lowering the risk of disasters, including the anticipation, preparedness, and response to adverse events.
Term: Knowledge Mismatch
Definition:
Disparities in data and understanding between different levels or types of knowledge related to climate change.
Term: Legislative Norms
Definition:
Legal frameworks and regulations that guide societal behavior and interactions with the environment.
Term: Social Justice
Definition:
The fair distribution of resources, opportunities, and treatment regardless of social status.