Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's explore the three eras of climate change awareness. In the first era, from the 1980s to 2002, the main concern was greenhouse gas emissions. Can anyone tell me what the focus was during this time?
It was mostly about environmental problems, right?
Exactly! Now, in the second era, starting around 2000, there was increased collaboration among social scientists. What do you think this change indicates?
It shows that climate change is not just about the environment but also about social issues!
Correct! So, what do you think marked the significance of the third era?
That's when it became a global justice issue.
Yes! This includes legal frameworks that structure societal responses to climate challenges. So, how have these legal frameworks influenced disaster responses?
They help enforce regulations, but can also be violated in informal settlements.
Exactly. Great points! So to summarize, the three eras show the evolving understanding of climate change, moving from an environmental focus to social justice and legal frameworks.
Now, let's shift gears and explore the differences between disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Can anyone explain a key difference?
DRR is focused on immediate disaster events, while CCA is about adapting over the long term.
Right! This raises an important question of scale, doesn't it? What challenges arise from these differing timeframes?
Well, adaptation strategies can take years to develop, while disasters can strike suddenly.
Exactly! And what about the agency roles? How does funding come into play?
Agency roles can differ based on funding available for either DRR or CCA.
Good point! That's a key challenge we need to address. In summary, the distinct operational scales and funding issues lead to substantial challenges in integrating these two approaches.
Next, we need to talk about the knowledge mismatches. What are some examples of these mismatches that can affect our climate response efforts?
Different institutions might use different data sets which can lead to confusion.
And many agencies might not communicate effectively with each other.
Exactly! That's where the transparent communication is crucial! So how can macro-level data inform micro-level decisions?
We would need a roadmap to integrate them better.
Yes! And Lei and Wang proposed a framework emphasizing six important questions about adaptation. Can anyone summarize those?
The framework addresses why adaptation is needed, what it entails, and who needs to adapt.
Exactly! So these questions guide us in forming a cohesive adaptation strategy.
Lastly, let’s discuss how the built environment fits into this. How might urban planning react to climate change?
Urban planners need to consider natural systems in their designs.
Exactly! By integrating ecological factors, we can create spaces more resilient to disasters. What about existing frameworks that can help with this?
There’s the multi-dimensional integrated framework, right?
Yes! And what are its three aspects?
Building practices, integrating natural ecosystems, and addressing past and future needs.
Great! Combining these practices supports a more resilient society. In summary, adapting our built environments is crucial for effective climate response and reconnection with nature.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
It outlines three eras in the understanding of climate change, highlighting the shift from a focus on greenhouse gas emissions to a multidimensional approach that involves social justice and legislative frameworks. It emphasizes knowledge mismatches in disaster strategies and calls for better integration of climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction.
The section explores the evolution of climate change discourse across three distinct eras: from the 1980s focused mainly on greenhouse gas emissions, to the 2000s where social dimensions emerged, and finally to the present where global justice and legislative frameworks are pivotal. In the first era, climate change was viewed primarily as an environmental issue, dominated by scientific discourse. The second era brought in social scientists and development workers, marking a collaborative effort across disciplines.
By the third era, climate change began to be discussed in terms of global justice, resulting in the emergence of laws and regulations that guide societal functions amidst environmental challenges. The section raises critical points about legislative violations in informal settlements, particularly in coastal regulation contexts highlighted by catastrophic events like tsunamis.
Additionally, the discussion involves knowledge mismatches across different scales and institutions. It underscores the need for clear communication and collaboration in utilizing macro-level data to inform micro-level decisions. The differentiation between disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) is highlighted, revealing contradictions such as short-term, event-based thinking versus long-term adaptation strategies which can stretch across years.
Furthermore, the ‘6W framework’ proposed by Lei and Wang is introduced, emphasizing the need to clearly define adaptation needs, actors involved, and effective principles. The concept of scale mismatches within the built environment is detailed, stressing the importance of integrating ecological considerations with urban planning, thus advocating for a holistic response to disasters and climate change.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Where we have also the knowledge mismatches in the norms when we talk about the climate change, it was when it was discussed in the 80s which was the first era from 80s to 2002 it was mostly focused on the greenhouse gas emissions. Where the most of the scientific community are involved, it is an environmental problem.
In this chunk, we explore how the understanding of climate change has evolved over time. Initially, from the 1980s to 2002, the focus was primarily on greenhouse gas emissions, which were seen as an environmental issue. This era emphasized the scientific community's role in identifying climate change as a problem resulting from human activities. The idea is that scientific understanding drives policy and action on climate change.
Think of it like a car manufacturer realizing that their cars produce a lot of harmful emissions. Initially, the focus is on reducing these emissions without considering other aspects like fuel efficiency or alternative energy. Over time, they would need to look at the entire vehicle's environmental impact.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Whereas in the second era from 2000s this has been seen by the International agenda, and also the social dimension come into the picture where the social scientists and the development workers have increased their cooperation in the second era.
This chunk highlights the shift in perspective during the 2000s, where the understanding of climate change broadened to include social dimensions. Social scientists and development workers began collaborating with environmentalists to address climate change not just as an ecological issue but also considering its social implications, such as inequality and community resilience.
Imagine a community where a factory is causing pollution. Initially, environmentalists focus on reducing emissions. Yet, social workers step in to highlight how pollution disproportionately affects lower-income families, leading to a more comprehensive approach that includes economic and social justice in the solutions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In the third era it also looks from the you know this has been felt by other countries and other regions. So this is become a question of global justice in the near future that is where the legal dimension came in third era which is, and this is where we need to talk about develop of certain legislative cultural and behavioral norms which determine the functioning of human society and how the interactions between nature and society were created.
In the third era, the discussion of climate change expanded to include global justice, emphasizing the need for equitable responses to its impacts. This era also introduced legal dimensions, focusing on creating laws and norms that guide society’s interaction with the environment. The idea is to foster a legal framework that ensures everyone’s rights in the face of climate change.
Consider an international treaty aimed at reducing emissions. It's similar to creating a house rule for a group of roommates: everyone agrees to do their part in maintaining the common space, which not only benefits them but also ensures fairness in how they share and manage the shared resources.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So many of these legislative norms were often violated in the context of informal and coastal settlements. For example, the coastal regulation zone which was formed in 1991 and revised 19 times until the tsunami have struck. But then they were barely implemented.
Here, we address the challenges in implementing the laws and regulations aimed at reducing climate risks, particularly in informal and coastal settlements. Despite the creation of legislative frameworks like the coastal regulation zone, actual enforcement has been lax, resulting in ineffective policies that fail to protect these vulnerable areas.
It’s like making sure a safety law is followed on a construction site. If the law exists but is not enforced, workers might ignore safety gear, putting everyone at risk. Similarly, without enforcement, communities in coastal regions remain at risk despite existing regulations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Also the knowledge mismatches when we talk about different scales, different data sets, different climate and risk scientist’s practitioners which they do not bring the transparent communication and collaboration and joint programming between various levels of actor’s, institutions, and agencies.
This chunk discusses the difficulty of integrating knowledge from various sources and scales, such as macro-level data from governments or organizations versus micro-level data collected by local practitioners. The lack of communication can lead to mismatched responses to climate risks, hindering effective adaptation and disaster risk reduction strategies.
Think of it as a team sport where each player has a specific role. If the defenders don’t communicate with the forwards, they may not work together effectively, leading to missed opportunities. Similarly, different experts in climate science need to share insights to create cohesive strategies for action.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So for this Lei and Wang they actually come up with more explicit frameworks they call about '6w framework'. So they talk about why adaptation is needed for natural disaster risk, what is adaptation to disaster risk, and adapt to what, who has to adapt?.
This chunk introduces the '6w framework,' which outlines critical questions regarding adaptation strategies for disaster risk. This framework helps clarify why adaptation is necessary, what it entails, and who should be involved in the process, creating a structured approach to addressing these challenges.
Consider preparing for a big storm. A good planning framework would ask questions like 'What supplies do we need?' 'Who will stay back to help?' and 'How do we deal with the aftermath?' The '6w framework' serves a similar purpose in guiding climate adaptation.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So there is a brief summary of this whole 6w framework has been listed out and now one of the important understanding from a built environment perspective what we can see is there is a scale mismatches.
This chunk emphasizes the importance of considering the built environment, which includes infrastructure and urban planning. It points out that architects and planners often overlook the larger ecological systems surrounding their projects, leading to a disconnection between human structures and natural environments, which can exacerbate climate vulnerability.
Imagine building a house without considering the local weather and land features. If the designs don’t account for local flood patterns or natural drainage, the house might face severe water damage. Thus, it is crucial to integrate knowledge about both man-made and natural systems.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And when we talk about an integrated multi-dimensional framework, so it investigates on three aspects; one is how different building practices have offered choices to variety of users and users, how the natural environment with its ecosystems and services has been integrated in the place making process in different disaster recovery process.
This chunk elaborates on the concept of an integrated multi-dimensional framework that examines how various building practices give options to different users. It also focuses on how natural environments, including ecosystems, should be considered in urban planning and disaster recovery, ensuring that human and ecological needs are balanced.
Think about creating a community park. It's not just about planting trees or installing benches; it also involves considering the local wildlife and water management. When the community participates in planning, it leads to a space that meets both human and ecological needs, enhancing overall resilience.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Eras of Climate Change: The three significant periods in understanding climate change - environmental focus, social dimensions, and legal frameworks.
Knowledge Mismatches: Disparities in information impacting effective climate response strategies.
Integration of CCA and DRR: The need for cohesive strategies combining climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The Coastal Regulation Zone formed in 1991 demonstrates legislative attempts to manage coastal environments, but its violations reveal systemic issues in enforcement.
The integration of ecological systems in urban planning can involve using green roofs to mitigate flooding risks.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Three eras we see, from gases to laws so free, adapting to change as we must agree.
Once upon a time, the climate was just an environmental tale. Slowly, social scientists joined, weaving a narrative where every voice had a role, leading to a justice-focused future.
Remember 6Ws for adaptation: Why, What, Who, How, When, and Where.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Definition:
Adjustments made in natural or human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects.
Term: Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Definition:
Strategies aimed at preventing the creation of new risks or reducing existing risks to hazards.
Term: Knowledge Mismatches
Definition:
Disparities in information and data across different levels of institutions that hinder effective communication and collaboration.
Term: MacroLevel Data
Definition:
Data that provides a broad overview of climate patterns and trends at a global or continental scale.
Term: MicroLevel Data
Definition:
Data focused on local or specific instances, often guiding immediate action in environmental management.
Term: 6W Framework
Definition:
A framework that outlines critical questions regarding adaptation: why, what, who, how, and the principles of effectiveness.