Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start by exploring the timeline of climate change discussions. Can anyone tell me what the focus was during the first era which lasted from the 1980s to 2002?
The focus was primarily on greenhouse gas emissions, right?
Exactly! This period emphasized environmental impacts rather than social or legal implications. Now, can someone explain what significant changes occurred in the second era?
In the 2000s, there was an increase in collaboration between social scientists and development workers.
Correct! This collaboration began to introduce social dimensions into the climate change debate. What do you think was a key focus in the third era?
The global justice aspect became significant, focusing on legal and legislative dimensions.
Well articulated! This era called for new legislative norms reflecting how societies function and interact with nature. We'll delve deeper into these norms in our next session.
Now let's shift to the 6W Framework. Can anyone recall what the first 'W' stands for?
'Why adaptation is needed for natural disaster risk.'
Excellent! This framework sets a foundation for our understanding of adaptation. What about the second 'W'?
'What is adaptation to disaster risk?'
Right again! This question guides us in identifying what specific changes are required. Can you share the third W?
'Adapt to what?'
Perfect! It's crucial to understand the specific challenges we are adapting to. The fourth, who has to adapt?
'Who should adapt?'
Spot on! Identifying the actors involved is critical. Finally, can someone summarize the last two W's?
'How to adapt?' and 'What principles or criteria exist to assist adaptation effectiveness?'
Exactly, those questions help apply the framework practically. Remember the acronym '6Ws' to help recall these components easily!
Now, let’s discuss the knowledge mismatches mentioned. Can someone explain why these mismatches matter?
They can lead to ineffective communication and collaboration among different levels of actors and institutions.
Exactly. These mismatches challenge our ability to integrate macro-level knowledge into local contexts. How should we address these challenges?
We need to ensure transparency and collaboration between various agencies and stakeholders.
Well said! It's about creating a clear roadmap for integrating climate change adaptation with disaster risk reduction strategies. Can anyone summarize some of the spatial challenges we might face?
There are issues related to different spatial scales and regional impacts that require different handling.
Great point! Understanding these challenges is key to effective planning.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section explores the evolution of climate change discussions from the 1980s to the present, emphasizing the need for collaboration between different scientific communities. It introduces the 6W Framework, which addresses critical questions on adaptation and highlights challenges related to knowledge and legislative norms that impact disaster preparedness and adaptation efforts.
The chapter outlines the evolving discourse around climate change, emphasizing distinct phases from the 1980s to the present:
1. First Era (1980s - 2002): Focus on greenhouse gas emissions framed largely as an environmental problem with little social or legal perspective.
2. Second Era (2000s onwards): Development agencies and social scientists began to collaborate, expanding the dialogue to social dimensions and approaches to climate change.
3. Third Era: Acknowledged the global dimensions of climate justice, emphasizing the need for legislative frameworks that govern human interaction with natural environments, often referring to informal settlements where norms are poorly implemented.
Moreover, the chapter addresses significant knowledge mismatches and calls for better integration of macro-level climate data with micro-level realities. It emphasizes the 6W Framework proposed by Lei and Wang, which interrogates:
- Why adaptation is crucial.
- What needs adaptation.
- Who should adapt.
- How adaptation should occur.
- What principles or criteria to enhance effectiveness exist.
Ultimately, the text underlines the importance of understanding spatial vulnerabilities and the historical context of legislative frameworks, as well as the necessity for multi-dimensional integration in planning and cooperation among various stakeholders.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Where we have also the knowledge mismatches in the norms when we talk about the climate change, it was when it was discussed in the 80s which was the first era from 80s to 2002 it was mostly focused on the greenhouse gas emissions. Where the most of the scientific community are involved, it is an environmental problem. Whereas in the second era from 2000s this has been seen by the International agenda, and also the social dimension come into the picture where the social scientists and the development workers have increased their cooperation in the second era. In the third era it also looks from the you know this has been felt by other countries and other regions. So this is become a question of global justice in the near future that is where the legal dimension came in third era which is, and this is where we need to talk about develop of certain legislative cultural and behavioral norms which determine the functioning of human society and how the interactions between nature and society were created.
In the context of climate change, the discussion has evolved over three distinct eras. The first era, from the 1980s to 2002, primarily focused on greenhouse gas emissions as an environmental issue, involving mainly scientists. The second era beginning in the 2000s recognized climate change as an international concern, integrating social dimensions and fostering collaboration among social scientists and development workers. The third era emphasizes global justice and introduces legal considerations, marking a shift towards understanding the legal frameworks that guide societal interactions with the environment.
Think of it like the progression of a community's understanding of a health crisis. Initially, they might recognize a virus is spreading (first era), then they realize they need community health workers and social outreach (second era), and finally, laws are enacted for vaccinations and public health safety (third era).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So to summarise whole aspect we see that differences and challenges we have disaster risk reduction and the climate change adaptation. This because it is aimed at the adaptation strategy which tells of scale mismatches because it is aimed at disaster event, it is a long term implications. A draught is not just only a matter of one month, it may come from years of years or together. Whereas the spatial scales respective to regions and localities prone to occur, well it is a global scale sometimes is a continental and intercontinental impacts.
Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) face several challenges due to their differing focuses. DRR is often event-focused and considers short-term consequences while CCA takes a long-term view of climate impacts, focusing on gradual changes like droughts that can develop over years. The spatial context also varies; local and regional planning must consider both immediate disaster risks and broader climate trends that can affect areas on a global scale.
Imagine preparing for a home improvement project (CCA) that involves installing an upgraded roof (long-term) versus fixing a leak (short-term). A leak might need immediate attention (DRR) while the roof upgrade prepares for future storms.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So for this Lei and Wang they actually come up with more explicit frameworks they call about “6w framework”. So they talk about why adaptation is needed for natural disaster risk, what is adaptation to disaster risk, and adapt to what, who has to adapt?. Who should adopt? How to adapt? What are the possible principles or criteria to assist effectiveness of adaptation?.
The 6W framework introduced by Lei and Wang outlines critical questions for effectively approaching adaptation to disaster risks. These questions include: Why is adaptation necessary? What specific aspects require adaptation? Who must adapt? Additionally, it seeks to address the methods of adaptation and the principles that could enhance its effectiveness. This comprehensive approach ensures that adaptation strategies are well thought out and inclusive.
Think of the 6W framework as a guide for planning a community event. You need to ask: Why are we organizing this event (purpose)? What activities are suitable (what to adapt)? Who will be involved (who has to adapt)? How will we carry out our plans (how to adapt)? And what standards do we need for success (principles of effectiveness)?
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So it is where in my current ongoing study I developed this framework where we have the spatial dimension and which has also the vulnerability in impacting on these, and there is also the adaptation process both pre-disaster in disaster post-disaster and the future risk which has a short-term and medium-term of single and multiple disasters.
In this ongoing study, a framework is proposed that takes into account both spatial dimensions and vulnerabilities when developing adaptation strategies. The goal is to analyze the adaptation processes across different stages: pre-disaster, during a disaster, and post-disaster. This framework also considers the risks associated with both singular and multiple disaster events over short and medium-term time frames.
Think of preparing for a roller coaster (disaster). Before getting on, you check the safety measures (pre-disaster planning). While on the ride, you experience twists and turns (during the disaster), and when done, you reflect on the experience and adjust for the next time (post-disaster adaptation).
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Climate Change Discourse: Understanding how the narratives surrounding climate change have shifted over the decades.
6W Framework: A comprehensive approach questioning why, what, who, how, and principles of adaptation.
Knowledge Mismatches: Issues that arise due to miscommunication and differing data scales between stakeholders.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
An example of knowledge mismatch is when a local community uses outdated data for flood management, leading to inadequate preparation.
Implementation of the Coastal Regulation Zone demonstrates legislative norms that were not effectively executed, highlighting gaps in disaster preparedness.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In the 80s it was green, not a social scene; 2000 and beyond, where social bonds spawned.
Imagine a world where scientists sought answers to climate change over decades—first focusing on emissions like a tree learning to grow; then, social scientists joined them to enrich the narrative.
Remember the acronym 6Ws: Why, What, Who, How, Work, Wisdom to keep adaptation effective and wise.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Climate Change
Definition:
Long-term alteration in temperature and typical weather patterns in a place.
Term: 6W Framework
Definition:
A framework developed by Lei and Wang addressing adaptation strategies related to disaster risk reduction.
Term: Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
Definition:
Activities aimed at minimizing vulnerabilities and disaster risks throughout a society.
Term: Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Definition:
Adjustments made in response to the actual or expected impacts of climate change.
Term: Knowledge Mismatches
Definition:
Discrepancies in understanding and communication between different data sets and actors involved in climate issues.