Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we’re discussing community efforts to upgrade shelters. Can someone summarise why these upgrades are important?
They increase safety and comfort for the residents.
Exactly! When communities take charge, they can prioritize aspects like security, ventilation, and affordability. What were the first priorities in the upgrade process?
First was doors, then walls, and third was windows for ventilation.
Great! And it’s interesting how some used local materials for those upgrades. Can anyone explain how that process might benefit the community?
It allows them to tailor their homes to their specific needs and supports local economies!
Correct! This reinforces the idea that housing is a process, not just a finished product. Remember, housing is about personalization!
Let's explore the roles of various organizations in these shelter upgrades. How did the government contribute?
They expanded the project from 18 to 20 square meters for better living space!
Exactly! And they worked with UNHCR and other NGOs to build thousands of low-cost houses. Why is collaboration with other entities important?
They can share resources and expertise, making the project more effective and advancing faster.
Very true! The success of such initiatives relies heavily on partnerships. Can you think of ways governments can enhance these partnerships?
By creating supportive policies and removing bureaucratic barriers!
Absolutely! Supporting local materials and labor also creates more jobs while ensuring housing meets community needs.
Now, let’s turn to the theoretical aspects. How does Christopher Alexander's view of shelter differ from traditional perspectives?
He sees housing as a process of creating lives and spaces that change over time, not just a static structure.
Exactly! It emphasizes user involvement and gradual improvements. What do you think this means for communities?
They can improve their homes as their needs change without waiting for a complete redesign from professionals.
Right! This holistic approach recognizes the evolving nature of living spaces as communities grow and change. Can you remember Turner’s view on use-value versus market-value?
Yes! He stressed that use-value is more important—for people, it's not about the cost, but how well it serves their needs!
Excellent! Remember that the best housing solutions will meet real needs, not just market demands.
Finally, let’s talk about community empowerment in decision-making. How do you think individual decisions impact the bigger picture?
When households make informed choices about their spaces, it slowly changes the urban fabric, right?
Exactly! This transformation happens at three levels: infill, support, and tissue. Can anyone explain those levels briefly?
The tissue is the urban fabric, support is the building, and infill is what residents do inside their homes.
Well summarized! This interactivity shows how people adapt to their lived environment. What’s crucial for engaging the community in these processes?
Consulting them and understanding their resources and vulnerabilities!
Yes! When we consider the community's needs and challenges, we empower them to make transitions effectively.
Let's reflect on the importance of the livelihood framework in housing. Why is it vital?
Because it ties housing to economic stability, helping families grow and thrive!
Great insight! This framework shows how access to various resources impacts housing success. Can anyone suggest a few resources?
Social, economic, human, and political resources?
Absolutely! And these resources must be accessible within the community's vulnerability context. What happens if these aren’t considered?
They could end up with temporary solutions without building long-term sustainability.
Excellent point! Sustainable solutions require more than just providing shelter; they need to foster resilience in communities.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section illustrates how community-driven improvements in housing can lead to significant upgrades in living conditions. It describes the roles of various actors, including government and NGOs, in facilitating these upgrades and emphasizes the collaborative processes of building, personalizing shelter, and addressing economic and social factors that affect housing development.
The section 'Partnerships and Support' focuses on the dynamic processes involved in upgrading shelters through community initiatives. Over a period of one month, it was noted that 53% of house owners began improving their transitional shelters using reclaimed materials and local resources. The prioritization of renovations was evident with doors, walls, and windows highlighted as essential upgrades for better ventilation and security. Some households took initiative by purchasing their own timber for constructing walls, doors, and windows, while others opted to sell provided materials to finance labor costs, showcasing personal agency in the upgrade process.
Government and organizational support played a critical role in realizing these upgrades. Initiatives led to the construction of over 40,000 low-cost houses in collaboration with entities such as UNHCR and MoSSP, demonstrating the power of partnerships in scaling housing solutions. The theoretical framework of transitional shelter, as explained by theorists like Christopher Alexander and John F.C. Turner, posits housing as a process shaped by user needs rather than merely a final product. This user-driven approach emphasizes affordability and personalization based on community context.
Furthermore, the section discusses the layers of decision-making involved in housing development, from urban fabric to individual user adaptations. The construction layers’ concept, presented by Ian Bentley, highlights how buildings evolve over time with user involvement, reflecting the necessity for flexible building regulations and community engagement in the decision-making process. Overall, the section underscores the importance of financial, material, and governance support in enabling effective housing solutions for vulnerable communities.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And also, this is a kind of partial upgrade with reclaimed materials they have the developed with the kind of whatever, they have able to procure from the past site or with their feasibilities, they have made some modifications to their shelters. And within a month 53% of the house owners have started to upgrade their shelters and this is very quick, within a month if this kind of change is 53%. The priorities were first doors, second walls and the third is windows, so the ventilation aspect.
Many households have quickly begun upgrading their shelters using reclaimed materials. Within a month, over half (53%) of house owners have started this upgrade. The improvements focus primarily on critical aspects: first, they prioritized upgrading doors for security and access; second, they focused on walls for structure and insulation; and third, they worked on windows to improve ventilation.
Imagine a student quickly improving their study room—first they replace the old door to make it safer, next they add new walls to block out noise, and finally, they install larger windows to let in fresh air and natural light. Just like this student, the households are making their space more comfortable and useful.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And some beneficiaries bought their own timber for walls, doors and windows as we have seen in this complete set is in a timber. For the outset and used the plastic sheeting provided to the line of the walls, so they covered with a kind of partial covering with a plastic sheet. Others sold a plastic sheeting and hired the local artisans to build adobe walls.
Beneficiaries demonstrated creativity by purchasing their own timber to improve their shelters. They also used plastic sheeting to partially cover their walls. Some opted to sell this plastic to hire local artisans who helped them build more permanent adobe walls. This highlights how individuals can leverage available resources creatively to meet their needs.
Consider how a group of friends might pool their money to rent a skilled cook for a party instead of cooking themselves. In this case, the beneficiaries are like those friends; they are resourceful, trading what they have (like plastic sheeting) for services (like skilled labor) to enhance their homes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, they have given it back and they sold it in the market and they could able to get some money and they could able to put some more money and built the adobe walls and so this whole process you know, it’s all showing up an incremental process depending on each household what kind of economic feasibility they had.
The upgrading process is incremental, meaning households make gradual improvements based on their financial ability. By selling materials, they generate funds to invest back into their homes, like building stronger adobe walls. This approach reflects each household's unique situation and resources, reinforcing the concept of personal agency in the improvement process.
Think of a gardener who starts with a few plants. As they learn how to care for them, they sell some flowers at a market and use the money to buy better soil or more seeds. Similarly, these households improve their shelters as they expand their financial capabilities over time.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, with this, the government have understood that yes there is a possibility that to scale up this process. So, now what they did was they developed from 18 square meters to 20 square meters and the permanent walls of adobe and timber and they launched the project build about 40,000 low cost houses. So, by the end of March 2009, it is about 16,240 were built and mainly with the partnership of UNHCR and MoSSP.
The success of these upgrades prompted the government to scale up efforts, increasing the size of shelters and initiating a larger project to build 40,000 low-cost houses. By March 2009, over 16,240 houses were constructed thanks to partnerships with organizations like the UNHCR and MoSSP, ensuring comprehensive support for housing solutions.
Imagine a school realizing how well its students are doing with a new teaching method. They then decide to implement the method school-wide, allowing more students to benefit from it. In this case, the government extends successful housing strategies to a larger number of people, just like a school spreading effective teaching practices.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But when you talk about the theoretical understanding of it, you know as I said you in the beginning transition shelter is not a noun, it is a verb, it is a process. So, as Christopher Alexander describes a house is an activity which is ‘created gradually, as a direct result of living which is happening in it and around it’ by people who spend only what they can afford.
The underlying theory of transitional shelter is that it is not merely a fixed structure but an evolving process shaped by the inhabitants over time. Christopher Alexander highlights that homes are created through ongoing activities and the daily lives of people, reflecting their economic realities and personal choices.
Think of a chef who perfects a recipe over time. They adjust flavors, ingredients, and techniques based on feedback and experience, much like families adapt their living spaces based on needs and circumstances. Their homes, like recipes, become refined versions of initial ideas.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And similarly, John Habraken supports on 3 levels of decision making; one is the tissue and the support which is the base building. The tissue refers to the urban fabric and the support refers to the base building and the fitout refers to the infill, what the people have done in their houses and the tissue tends to remain the same because it’s a larger content and the supports will change with time and infill will change more regularly.
John Habraken identifies three levels of decision-making in housing: 'tissue', 'support', and 'fitout'. 'Tissue' refers to the overall urban environment, 'support' is the structure of buildings, and 'fitout' is the interior design and improvements made by residents. The urban tissue remains largely unchanged, whereas the support and fitout can evolve over time to meet community needs.
Think about how a city might maintain its parks (the tissue) while allowing individual homeowners to paint their houses any color they choose (the fitout). Over time, as families move and renovate their homes, the support structure (like the roads and sidewalks) may also evolve to accommodate new changes, mirroring how communities adapt to individual needs.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Incremental Upgrades: Process of improving shelters gradually over time.
Use Value vs. Market Value: The emphasis on how housing serves its users rather than its financial value.
Partnerships: Importance of collaboration among various stakeholders in housing initiatives.
Infill, Support, Tissue: Levels of decision-making reflecting user adaptations, structural support, and community contexts.
Sustainable Livelihood Framework: A model that highlights how access to resources impacts community resilience.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
A community repairing and reinforcing doors as prioritization for safety.
Using local timber and materials for shelter upgrades, strengthening local economies.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
For housing, it’s clear, upgrades bring cheer; with doors that lock tight, and windows for light!
Imagine a community where everyone works together to improve their houses one step at a time, swap ideas, and share resources, transforming their neighborhood into a safe and inviting home.
Remember the acronym SUPE: S for Shelter (upgrades), U for Use value, P for Partnerships, E for Empowerment in decision-making.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Incremental Upgrades
Definition:
Small, gradual improvements made to housing over time.
Term: Use Value
Definition:
The actual utility that a housing unit provides to its occupants.
Term: Market Value
Definition:
The economic value of a housing unit in the market.
Term: Infill
Definition:
The modifications made by residents to personalize their homes.
Term: Partnerships
Definition:
Collaboration between different organizations and parties to achieve common goals.
Term: Livelihood Framework
Definition:
A model that examines how people access resources for economic stability.
Term: Tissue, Support, and Infill
Definition:
The three levels in housing decision-making: urban fabric, structural support, and individual adaptations.
Term: Sustainable Housing
Definition:
Housing solutions that are environmentally, economically, and socially viable in the long term.
Term: Transition Shelter
Definition:
Temporary housing solutions that enable a gradual transition to permanent housing.
Term: Vulnerability Context
Definition:
The environmental, social, and economic conditions impacting a community's ability to access resources.