Ethical Use of AI in Hazard Prediction - 20.14.2 | 20. Applications in Geotechnical Engineering and Slope Stability Analysis | Robotics and Automation - Vol 2
Students

Academic Programs

AI-powered learning for grades 8-12, aligned with major curricula

Professional

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design

Games

Interactive Games

Fun games to boost memory, math, typing, and English skills

Ethical Use of AI in Hazard Prediction

20.14.2 - Ethical Use of AI in Hazard Prediction

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Practice

Interactive Audio Lesson

Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.

Avoiding Bias in Training Datasets

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Today, we are going to discuss the importance of avoiding bias in AI training datasets. Can anyone tell me why bias is a concern in AI?

Student 1
Student 1

Bias can lead to incorrect predictions and results.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! When AI models are trained on biased data, they tend to perform poorly on real-world, diverse datasets. This can jeopardize safety in areas like hazard prediction. A classic example is the reliance on historical datasets which might not represent current dynamics.

Student 2
Student 2

How can we mitigate this bias?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

To mitigate bias, developers can use diverse datasets that are representative of all relevant populations and situations, and apply techniques like data augmentation. Remember, a good way to remember how to eliminate bias is to think of 'Diversity and Balance'.

Student 3
Student 3

That’s a helpful mnemonic!

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Great! Let's summarize: bias can lead to unsafe predictions, and the solution lies in using diverse and balanced data.

Accountability for Incorrect Predictions

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Now, let’s shift to accountability. Why do you think it's vital to establish accountability in AI applications?

Student 4
Student 4

If something goes wrong, we need to know who is responsible for fixing it.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! Accountability ensures that there are mechanisms in place to address failures. If an AI makes a wrong prediction about a potential hazard, we need to know who is liable—developers, engineers, or stakeholders.

Student 1
Student 1

How can we enforce accountability?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

One way is through clear documentation outlining each participant's role in AI deployment. An acronym to remember is 'TRACE'—Transparency, Responsibility, Accountability, Clarity, and Evaluation. Let's summarize this point: establishing accountability is crucial for trust, safety, and improvement.

Transparency in Alert Systems

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Lastly, let’s discuss transparency. Why is transparency important in AI alert systems?

Student 2
Student 2

It helps users understand how alerts are generated.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! When users understand the algorithms, they trust systems more. This is critically important in hazard prediction where wrong alerts can lead to chaos.

Student 3
Student 3

What are some ways to achieve transparency?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

We can achieve transparency by using explainable AI techniques that clarify how decisions are made. Remember the acronym 'CLARITY'—Clear, Logical, Accessible, Relevant, Informative, Trustworthy, and Yielding acceptable results. To wrap up, transparency fosters trust and effective risk management.

Introduction & Overview

Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.

Quick Overview

This section discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI in predicting hazards, focusing on bias, accountability, and transparency.

Standard

In the realm of hazard prediction, ethical considerations are paramount. This section emphasizes avoiding bias in AI training datasets, ensuring accountability for incorrect predictions, and maintaining transparency in alert systems. These principles are essential for harnessing AI responsibly in geotechnical applications.

Detailed

Ethical Use of AI in Hazard Prediction

In modern geotechnical engineering, particularly in hazard prediction, the application of AI poses significant ethical considerations. Three critical aspects must be addressed:

  1. Avoiding Bias in Training Datasets: AI systems learn from historical data, which can contain biases. If these biases are not addressed, they may lead to flawed predictions that could negatively impact safety and decision-making.
  2. Accountability for Incorrect Predictions: There needs to be a clear line of accountability when AI predictions go wrong. The stakeholders using AI systems must ensure that mechanisms are in place to handle errors and assess responsibility—whether it be manufacturers, engineers, or software developers.
  3. Transparency in Alert and Risk Classification Systems: AI systems need to operate transparently, enabling users to understand how decisions are made. Clarity in algorithms and their outputs is vital for trust and efficacy.

These ethical considerations underscore the importance of a structured approach to AI implementation that safeguards public safety while optimizing geotechnical hazard management.

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Avoiding Bias in Training Datasets

Chapter 1 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

• Avoiding bias in training datasets.

Detailed Explanation

In the context of AI, bias occurs when algorithms produce prejudiced results due to flawed or unrepresentative training data. To avoid bias, it’s essential to use diverse datasets that reflect various conditions and demographics. This ensures that the AI doesn't favor one group or scenario over another, leading to more accurate and equitable predictions. For instance, if an AI model used for hazard prediction was trained primarily on data from urban areas, it may not perform well in rural or underrepresented regions.

Examples & Analogies

Consider a recipe that only includes ingredients from one specific region; it may not taste good when prepared in a different region where flavors differ. Similarly, an AI trained only on specific types of soil data may struggle to make accurate predictions in environments it hasn't 'tasted' before.

Accountability for Incorrect Predictions

Chapter 2 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

• Accountability for incorrect predictions.

Detailed Explanation

When AI systems make predictions about hazards, it is crucial to establish clear accountability for those predictions. This means determining who is responsible if the AI produces an incorrect forecast that leads to various consequences, such as damage or loss of life. Organizations must implement governance frameworks that define responsibilities for the AI’s outputs, ensuring that human oversight is integral to the decision-making process.

Examples & Analogies

Think of a doctor making a diagnosis based on lab results. If the diagnosis is incorrect due to a misinterpretation of the results, patients can suffer consequences. The doctor (or healthcare system) would need to be accountable for the error. Similarly, if an AI incorrectly forecasts a natural disaster, there needs to be clear accountability to ensure rectifications and improvements are made.

Transparency in Alert and Risk Classification Systems

Chapter 3 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

• Transparency in alert and risk classification systems.

Detailed Explanation

Transparency in AI systems involves making the methods and reasoning behind AI predictions clear to users and stakeholders. This includes how risks are classified and how alerts are generated. For stakeholders to trust these systems, they must understand the underlying process, the data used, and the rationale for specific conclusions reached by the AI. This transparency can help stakeholders make informed decisions about actions to take in response to predicted hazards.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine a weather app that tells you there's a storm coming. If the app explains that the storm alert is based on various signals like temperature drops and wind patterns, you're more likely to trust that information. Conversely, if it simply tells you to take cover without explaining why, you may question its reliability. Transparency is key for understanding the value and reliability of AI predictions.

Key Concepts

  • Bias: Concerns related to unfair predictions made by AI systems based on flawed data.

  • Accountability: The responsibility of stakeholders for the outcomes of AI predictions.

  • Transparency: The necessity for clear understanding of AI operations to build trust.

Examples & Applications

A biased AI may output higher hazard levels for an underrepresented community based on flawed historical data.

A failure to establish accountability led to confusion following an AI-driven landslide alert during an unthreatening geologic event.

Memory Aids

Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts

🎵

Rhymes

To avoid bias in AI, let’s be diverse and spry.

📖

Stories

Imagine a town where the AI predicts hazard risks. If the AI is biased, it signals danger to the wrong places. Once the townsfolk demanded to know why, the AI shared its tales, clarifying how it worked, and trust grew.

🧠

Memory Tools

To remember accountability, think of 'ARE': Acknowledge, Responsibility, Evaluate.

🎯

Acronyms

For transparency, use 'CLEAR'

Clear

Logical

Easy to understand

Accessible

Relevant.

Flash Cards

Glossary

Bias

A systematic error in data or algorithm that leads to unfair outcomes, particularly affecting predictions.

Accountability

The obligation of organizations or individuals to accept responsibility for their actions and the consequences.

Transparency

Openness in AI systems about how algorithms work and how decisions are made, fostering trust.

Reference links

Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.