Practice Minimum Rear Open Space to be Provided - 6.9 | 6. Experiment No.6 | Building Planning and Computer- aided Civil Engineering drawing
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

6.9 - Minimum Rear Open Space to be Provided

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the minimum rear open space for a building up to 10m height?

💡 Hint: Think about safety and health regulations.

Question 2

Easy

Why is rear open space important?

💡 Hint: Consider the comfort of living in a building.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What is the average minimum rear open space for buildings up to 10m?

  • 1.0 m
  • 1.8 m
  • 3.0 m

💡 Hint: Recall the set regulations.

Question 2

True or False: The rear open space should always be less than 1.8m.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider the requirements to support health.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Propose a design for a mid-rise building while adhering to rear open space regulations.

💡 Hint: Think about the benefits of outdoor space.

Question 2

Discuss potential modifications to existing buildings that do not meet rear open space requirements.

💡 Hint: Consider practical alterations.

Challenge and get performance evaluation