Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we are going to discuss the concept of risk. Risk refers to the probability of a negative event occurring over a specific period. How do you think risk is evaluated, Student_1?
I think risk is just about how likely something bad can happen.
That's right! But it's more nuanced. We actually have two types of risk: objective risk, which is based on scientific data, and perceived risk, how people feel about it. Student_2, can you think of an example of perceived risk?
Maybe how people feel about flying in airplanes versus driving cars?
Exactly! Many people perceive flying as riskier than driving, even if statistics show it's safer. This is a great segue into our next discussion on the British Royal Society's white paper on risk.
Now let’s talk about how we evaluate risks. We often rely on data to quantify risks, which can involve thinking about potential costs and losses. Can someone give me a numerical example related to a risk?
If a flood causes $50 million in damage, that’s a way to quantify the risk associated with flooding.
Great example, Student_3! This helps in making informed decisions about disaster management. Now, how do you think this data influences public perception of risk? Student_4?
I think people might not trust the numbers if they don’t have personal experiences or belief in the data sources.
Exactly, the gap between data-driven conclusions and public perception is a key challenge in risk management.
Let’s apply what we've discussed. For example, smoking is known to increase risk for lung cancer. Student_1, can you explain how perceived risk plays a role in someone’s decision to smoke?
People might think they are invincible or not at risk.
Right! They might believe they can handle it, even though the objective risk is high. Similarly, Student_2, what about using seat belts?
Some may think that not wearing them is fine if they are good drivers.
Correct! Perceptions of safety can thwart the science which shows the benefits of seatbelt use. Bridging this gap is crucial.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section examines the nature of risk, differentiating between objective risk (scientifically measured) and perceived risk (public perceptions). The relevance of expert opinions and the importance of data in risk management are discussed, along with examples illustrating how people's perceptions of risk may not align with scientific findings.
In this section, we delve into the definition and understanding of risk, which generally refers to the probability of a specific adverse event occurring within a predetermined time frame. The British Royal Society's published white paper on risk assessment in the early 1980s underscores the complexity of risk understanding, as it emphasized a forum for debate rather than a conclusive consensus among experts or scientists.
Two types of risk are identified: objective risk, which is based on scientific estimations and rules, and perceived risk, which reflects how laypeople anticipate future events driven by personal beliefs rather than facts. Furthermore, determining risk typically involves numerical measures that quantify potential economic losses or impacts, like the expected costs of natural disasters.
Data plays a crucial role in refining risk estimates, yet the disparity between scientifically established objective risks and the subjective perceptions held by the public presents a significant challenge in disaster risk management. This section stresses the necessity to bridge this gap by educating individuals on scientifically accurate risk, using relatable examples, such as smoking or seatbelt usage, to highlight the contrast between perceived risks and actual dangers.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What is risk? Why do people not believe in risk? In 1982, the Britain Royal Society published a White book on risk assessment, which was revised in 1983. They invited many internationally recognized professors and scientists to estimate what is considered risky. Interestingly, the society stated a disclaimer, noting that the views expressed were solely those of the authors. This highlights that there was no collective view from the society regarding risk; it was merely a forum for debate.
This chunk introduces the concept of risk and why there may be skepticism surrounding it. It refers to a publication by the Britain Royal Society, where distinguished individuals were asked to assess risks. The disclaimer indicates that the society didn't endorse a single viewpoint on risk, leading to ambiguity in public perception.
Think of a medical study where various doctors provide their opinions on a treatment method. Each doctor may have different experiences and beliefs, so there isn't a unanimous verdict. This scenario is similar to the society’s findings: varying opinions create confusion about what risk truly means.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Experts provided differing views on risk, emphasizing that there are two types: objective risk and perceived risk. Objective risk is based on scientific estimations and follows established rules and laws. In contrast, perceived risk reflects how laypeople anticipate and interpret future events.
Here we differentiate between two categories of risk. Objective risk is quantifiable and relies on data, while perceived risk is subjective and based on individual beliefs or feelings. This distinction is important as it influences how people respond to safety measures and information.
Imagine a person deciding whether to swim in a lake. The objective risk (measured by data on accidents at that lake) might indicate it’s safe, while their perceived risk (influenced by stories of unseen dangers) may lead them to avoid swimming. This highlights the variance between the two types of risk.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Risk determination usually involves numerical measures. For instance, we express risk in potential financial loss due to natural disasters, such as a flood or earthquake. Phrases like 'loss of productivity' quantify risk in monetary terms, making it more relatable and understandable.
This chunk explains how risk is often portrayed using numbers, which helps communicate the potential impact clearly. By expressing risk quantitatively, it becomes easier to discuss and assess the implications of hazardous events.
Consider a company that faces potential losses during a hurricane. They might estimate that a storm could cost them $10 million. This numerical prediction helps them decide on insurance coverage and safety measures, making the concept of risk more tangible.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
To refine risk estimation, more data is essential. The more comprehensive the information available, the better the risk assessments can be fine-tuned. However, scientists warn that subjective perceptions of risk should not hinder disaster risk management.
This chunk emphasizes the importance of data in accurately assessing risk. It suggests that while data-driven understanding is crucial, one should not overlook individuals’ perceptions because they affect how people prepare for and respond to risks.
For instance, cities often use data from past hurricanes to prepare for future storms. However, if residents ignore warnings based on their perceptions of safety, the data becomes less effective. Thus, balancing data with public understanding becomes vital.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
It is important for risk managers to bridge the gap between scientific truths and public perceptions. They should inform the public about scientifically valid risks and address misconceptions. For example, smoking poses a clear risk to health, regardless of individual beliefs about it.
This segment discusses the necessity for managers to communicate the scientifically proven risks to the public. By educating individuals on matters like health hazards of smoking, managers can foster better understanding and potentially alter risky behaviors.
Consider a school holding a workshop about the dangers of drug abuse. Despite some students believing drugs are harmless, factual information presented in the workshop aims to change their perceptions and encourage healthier choices.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The conversation also includes discussions about perceptions of fun versus danger. For example, young people may find thrill in risk-taking behaviors, while older individuals may perceive those same behaviors as dangerous. Understanding these divergent views is crucial in assessing risk.
This chunk highlights how different age groups may perceive the same risky behavior differently, impacting their responses to risk. Young individuals often view risky actions as fun, whereas older adults may see them as dangerous.
Picture teenagers engaging in skateboarding tricks. To them, it’s exhilarating; they perceive it as fun. In contrast, their parents might view those same tricks as reckless and dangerous. These contrasting perspectives emphasize the importance of considering age-related perceptions when assessing risks.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
The difference between objective and perceived risk: Objective risk is scientifically measured, while perceived risk is based on personal beliefs.
The role of data in risk assessment: Accurate data is essential for precise risk estimation.
The importance of bridging the gap between expert assessments and public perceptions in disaster risk management.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Flying is statistically safer than driving, yet many perceive it as riskier due to fear.
Individuals may choose to smoke despite knowledge of its associated risks, reflecting a gap between perceived and actual risk.
People might not wear seat belts because they believe that good driving compensates for the lack of safety.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When you take a risk, don’t let fear whisk; look at the data, it’ll make you a wiz.
Imagine a castle where the brave knights fight dragons, but the villagers fear the knights more than the dragons. In reality, the dragons pose less danger; similarly, perceived risk can mislead us about true dangers.
RISK: Reliable Information Shows Knowledge - a way to remember that good data helps assess risks correctly.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Objective Risk
Definition:
A risk measured through scientific data and regulations, representing the factual likelihood of an adverse event occurring.
Term: Perceived Risk
Definition:
The risk that individuals believe exists based on their personal opinions and experiences, which may not align with scientific data.
Term: Probability
Definition:
The likelihood of a specific adverse event occurring within a set timeframe.
Term: Data
Definition:
Quantitative information used to assess risks and formulate decisions regarding risk management.