Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today we're discussing what risk really means. Can anyone share what they think risk is?
I think risk is the chance something bad will happen.
Exactly! It's about the probability of an adverse event occurring. Now, there are two types of risks: objective risk and perceived risk. Who can explain the difference?
Objective risk is based on actual data, while perceived risk is how individuals feel about it.
Great! Think of the acronym O.P. for Objective (data-driven) and P.erceived (belief-driven). Let's remember that!
But why should perceived risk matter?
That's an excellent question! Understanding perceived risk is crucial for effective communication, especially in public health.
In summary, risk signifies the likelihood of negative outcomes, classified into objective and perceived types.
How do scientists estimate risks?
They must use data and statistics.
Exactly! The more data there is, the better our estimations become. This plays a significant role in risk management. Why do you think we need accurate data?
To make informed decisions on safety and prevention.
Right! And we need to bridge the gap between data-driven insights and public perceptions. This is crucial in areas like disaster management. Any thoughts on how we can do this?
By educating people more about risk data.
Exactly, People need to understand scientific truths to better mitigate risks!
Now let's relate our discussion to smoking. Why do you think smoking is often seen differently?
Some people might think it's cool or that they won't get harmed.
Exactly. This illustrates perceived risk. They want to feel macho or cool, despite the objective risk that smoking drastically increases one's chance of disease. Can anyone give me an example?
Like when people drive without seatbelts, they feel fine and think they're safe!
Perfect example! We find that people need to see the real risks, not just what they feel. So, how do we overcome their perceptions?
Maybe through strong public health campaigns.
Absolutely! Effective communication is key to managing perceptions and promoting healthier choices.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section outlines the definitions of objective and perceived risks and highlights the complexities involved in risk assessment. It emphasizes that while objective risks are defined by scientific laws and estimations, perceived risks depend on individual beliefs. The discussion extends to smoking and illustrates how personal perception might obscure the actual risks associated with it.
This section delves deeply into the multi-faceted concept of risk, particularly in the context of smoking. It begins by discussing the historical perspective of risk assessments, including the notable 1982 White Book by the British Royal Society. This document signifies a significant step in understanding risk, although it highlights the scientists' hesitation to furnish collective responsibility over the findings.
The primary focus is on two kinds of risks: objective risk, which is scientifically measurable and follows defined scientific parameters, and perceived risk, which represents how individuals assess risks based on their beliefs and experiences.
Risk is associated with the probability of an adverse event occurring within a specific timeframe. The section elucidates how this is quantified, using numerical values that convey expected loss from events like natural disasters or health issues stemming from smoking.
Crucially, the risk estimation process is data-driven, emphasizing that the more comprehensive the data, the better the risk assessments can be. However, it also warns that subjective perceptions should not override these scientific interpretations, especially in disaster risk management.
The section exemplifies these theories using smoking as a case study, asserting that despite personal perceptions which may rationalize or diminish the perceived danger of smoking, the objective assessment firmly places smokers at higher risk of adverse health outcomes, illustrating the dissonance between perceived and actual risk. The discussion culminates in the recognition of the challenge in communicating scientific truths about risk effectively to the public.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here is a very important data, then what is risk? Why people are not believing risk? ... it is a forum of debate.
This chunk opens by questioning the concept of risk and why it is sometimes dismissed by people. It references a publication by the Britain Royal Society concerning risk assessment, highlighting the society's disclaimer that their report does not represent the collective views of the authors. The emphasis here is on the complexity and subjectivity of defining risk, as it is often a point of debate among experts, which raises questions about the reliability of these assessments.
Imagine a group of scientists trying to measure the risk of a new medicine. Each scientist might have different opinions based on their experiences and research. This diversity of views means that there isn't always a clear answer about what constitutes 'risky', making it similar to a debate where no one idea is universally accepted.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Experts and scientists are called and but disagreement continued about risk. ... the common people, they perceive about the anticipate about the future event that is perceived risk.
This section introduces two types of risk: objective risk and perceived risk. Objective risk refers to scientifically measured risk, grounded in data and scientific laws, while perceived risk encompasses the beliefs and feelings of laypeople about potential future events. This distinction is important because what science defines as risk may differ significantly from public perception.
Think about driving a car without a seatbelt. Statistically, the risk of serious injury increases significantly without a seatbelt (objective risk), yet some people may feel perfectly safe while driving this way (perceived risk). This divergence illustrates how individuals can perceive risk differently based on their experiences or beliefs.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, risk in general, we know the probability of a particular adverse event to occur during a particular period of time. ... expressed in numerical figure; 5 billion, 20 billion, 200 billion, or, 50 people died, 100 people died like that.
In this chunk, the definition of risk is clarified as the probability of an adverse event occurring within a defined timeframe. The discussion emphasizes that risk determination often relies on numerical expressions, such as the financial cost associated with disasters or the number of casualties in tragic events. Understanding this helps in quantifying risk and making informed decisions.
Consider the risk of flooding in a region that has previously experienced heavy rains. If experts estimate that there's a 20% chance of flooding based on past data, they might express the potential costs in monetary terms (e.g., $5 million in damages). This provides a clear picture of risk, making it easier to understand and manage.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, probability and magnitude often adverse event. ... more fine-tuned, more cutting-edge estimations we can make.
This section emphasizes the critical role of data in refining risk estimations. Without adequate data, making accurate assessments becomes difficult. More comprehensive data allows scientists to provide better-informed estimations, leading to improved disaster risk management strategies. However, it's important to reconcile scientific data with public perceptions to effectively communicate risk.
Imagine a weather forecasting team predicting a hurricane. If they have access to extensive historical weather data, satellite images, and predictive algorithms, they can estimate the likelihood and potential impact of the hurricane more accurately. Conversely, if they have limited data, their predictions would be less reliable, potentially leading to unpreparedness.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For example here, if you are smoking you are at risk, you believe or not ... which one?
The importance of bridging the gap between scientific understanding of risk and public perception is highlighted here. The example discusses smoking, which is scientifically linked to health risks. Despite this, many smokers may not accept or understand the level of risk associated with their habit. Risk managers must communicate effectively to align public perception with scientific facts.
Consider a young person who smokes cigarettes. They might see smoking as a symbol of coming of age and rebel against authority. However, the scientific community understands that smoking significantly increases the risk of lung cancer and other health issues. To bridge this gap, public health campaigns could use relatable messaging and testimonials to effectively communicate the dangers of smoking.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Risk: The probability of negative outcomes tied to certain events.
Objective Risk: Scientifically measurable and sound risks.
Perceived Risk: The subjective interpretation of risk by individuals.
Data's Role: More data leads to better risk assessments.
Public Health Importance: Effective communication can bridge gaps in understanding risk.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
An individual believes smoking is glamorous, despite the objective risks associated with lung cancer.
Using statistics, it's shown that driving without a seatbelt significantly increases the chance of injury in accidents.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If you puff on a cigarette, beware of regret; the risk is high, don’t let cool make you try.
Once there was a lion named Leo who thought he could fly. He saw others jump off cliffs and thought it was fun, ignoring the risk of falling. This story reminds us to assess risks, not just those who seem bold.
R.O.P: Risk (what could happen) - Objective (data) - Perceived (feelings).
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Objective Risk
Definition:
The measurable and scientifically assessed probability of an adverse event.
Term: Perceived Risk
Definition:
The likelihood of an adverse event as interpreted by individuals, often based on personal beliefs.
Term: Risk Assessment
Definition:
A systematic process of evaluating potential risks that could be involved in a projected activity or undertaking.
Term: DataDriven
Definition:
Approaches that rely on numerical data and statistics for decision-making and risk evaluation.
Term: Public Health Campaigns
Definition:
Organized efforts aimed at improving the health of populations through education and prevention measures.