Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we're going to talk about risk. So, can anyone tell me what they think risk is?
Isn't risk just the chance of something bad happening?
Exactly! Risk refers to the probability of a particular adverse event occurring within a given timeframe. Now, there are two types of risk we need to understand: objective and perceived risk.
What’s the difference between them?
Good question! Objective risk is scientifically measured, while perceived risk is how people view or interpret that risk. It's often subjective.
So, perceived risk can be different from actual risk?
Right again! For example, people might think smoking isn't dangerous, even though objectively it is. Understanding both types helps in risk management.
To remember these, think 'O' for Objective and 'P' for Perceived. Let’s move on!
Let's clarify how we determine objective risks. Can anyone suggest how we might express this scientifically?
Maybe using statistics or numbers?
Precisely! We express risks numerically, like the financial impact of a flood quantified in billions of dollars or the estimated deaths in a disaster.
What about perceived risks?
Perceived risks can differ widely. For example, people might fear flying more than driving, even though statistically, flying is safer.
So, even if the data shows one thing, people can feel differently?
Exactly! To remember this, think of the acronym ‘PF’ for Perceived Fear—it reflects how people view risky situations. Let’s now introduce how we can improve risk communication.
So, we’ve established the two types of risk. Now, how crucial do you think data is in risk management?
Data must be really important for making accurate assessments, right?
Correct! The more quality data we have, the better we can refine our estimations and make informed decisions regarding risk mitigation.
Can subjective risk in public opinion affect data interpretation?
Yes! Public perception can sometimes overshadow scientific data. It’s important for scientists and risk managers to communicate effectively.
How can we close that gap between scientific facts and public perception?
By providing accessible information and education, ensuring people understand the real risks associated with their activities. Always remind yourself: 'Science (truth) + Communication (sharing) = Better Risk Management.'
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section outlines how risk is assessed, emphasizing the difference between objective risk (scientifically quantified) and perceived risk (public opinion). It highlights the necessity of data in risk estimation and argues for reducing the gap between scientific and public perceptions of risk.
The concept of risk is pivotal in various fields, yet it remains debated, especially concerning what individuals perceive as risky versus the established scientific viewpoint. The British Royal Society published a white paper in 1982 to tackle this issue but distanced itself from the authors' opinions by issuing a disclaimer, highlighting the lack of a collective consensus on risk.
This section identifies two kinds of risk: objective risk, which is scientifically calculated based on data, and perceived risk, which reflects individuals' beliefs and anticipations regarding potential adverse events. Objective risk is quantifiable through numerical measures, such as financial estimates of losses due to disasters (e.g., monetary losses from floods or earthquakes). It emphasizes that risk assessment requires comprehensive data to refine estimations, underlining how subjective perceptions can diverge from scientific realities.
Though the scientific community stresses objective data in disaster risk management, it recognizes the importance of bridging the gap between expert analysis and the public's perception—encouraging better communication to align knowledge and beliefs. The efficacy of this approach can be examined through examples such as the risks associated with smoking or driving without a seatbelt, where statistical probabilities clash with individual beliefs about danger and acceptance of risk.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here is a very important data, then what is risk? Why people are not believing risk? there is a Britain Royal Society; they publish a White book on risk assessment in 1982 and in 1983, it was revised again.
This chunk introduces the concept of risk and raises questions about its understanding and acceptance among people. The Royal Society's publication indicates an effort to consolidate expert opinions on risk assessment, showing that even recognized authorities have sought to clarify what constitutes risk.
Imagine a daily weather forecast where experts predict a storm. Some people dismiss the warning, thinking it won't really happen. Just like the Royal Society gathering experts to define risk, meteorologists use data and models to forecast weather, yet people often respond to risks based on personal beliefs.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, I am not taking the responsibility here; society is telling, no collective view about risk, so it is not about to tell you that this is what is risk, a forum of debate.
This chunk discusses a disclaimer provided by the Royal Society regarding their findings on risk, emphasizing that the report reflects individual opinions rather than a unified stance. This illustrates the complexity and varied perceptions of risk even among experts, indicating that risk is a topic that remains under debate.
Think of a group of friends discussing which movie to watch. Each has a different opinion on what makes a movie enjoyable. Similarly, the Royal Society acknowledges that their findings on risk are just individual perspectives in an ongoing discussion.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we are saying that there are 2 kind of risk; one is objective risk that is scientific risk; another one is the perceived risk.
Here, the text introduces two specific categories of risk: objective risk and perceived risk. Objective risk is based on scientific measurements and calculations, while perceived risk is how individuals view or interpret risks based on personal experiences or biases. Understanding both types is crucial for effective risk management.
Consider driving a car. Objective risk includes statistical data about accidents, while perceived risk varies from person to person—some may feel safe, while others with anxiety may see it as dangerous, regardless of actual statistics.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, determinant of risk; how we determine a risk? Generally, we determine any kind of risk by numerical measures, like expressed in chance of that much cost in dollar or in rupees, loss is expected to due to a flood, a loss of productivity has been lost, that much of amount due to earthquake so, these always we express in numerical figure; 5 billion, 20 billion, 200 billion, or, 50 people died, 100 people died like that.
This chunk emphasizes that risk is often quantified with numerical measures, which helps to express the likelihood and potential impacts of adverse events. These figures provide a clearer picture of what risks entail in practical terms, making it easier for decision-makers to understand and manage them.
Imagine you are considering buying flood insurance for your home. The insurance company might present statistics showing that 1 in 100 homes in your area flood every year, and they could quantify potential losses in tens of thousands of dollars. This numerical representation allows you to assess your risk and make informed decisions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, probability and magnitude often adverse event. Now, risk estimation progress; if we want to progress more if you want to refine our estimation, one thing is very clear that we need data, without data we cannot do it so, more data where you have, the more fine-tuned, more cutting-edge estimations we can make.
This chunk discusses the critical role of data in refining risk estimations. It highlights that better data leads to more accurate predictions and assessments of risk. Collecting extensive data allows scientists and managers to make informed decisions about risk mitigation strategies.
Think of cooking a new dish. If you only have vague instructions, the outcome may be inconsistent. However, if you have detailed recipes with measurements and ingredients, your cooking will be more successful. Similarly, accurate data leads to better risk assessments.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, but they are making it very simple, the scientists are saying that you need data but remember that risk perception that is subjective risk, what laypeople think. Please do not incorporate that element in disaster risk management, is it really so?
In this chunk, the text addresses the difference between objective data-driven assessments of risk and subjective perceptions held by individuals. The scientists aim to create a clear distinction, suggesting that disaster risk management should primarily rely on data while questioning whether laypeople's perceptions should be ignored in practice.
Consider a community's fear of a new bridge being built. Engineers may assure everyone that it meets safety standards based on data, yet if local residents feel uncomfortable about it, their perceptions cannot be entirely overlooked. Effective communication about the safety based on data can help alleviate concerns.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
For example here, if you are smoking you are at risk, you believe or not you may be doing it because you want to be macho, or your body needs nicotine, but once you were smoking you are at risk that is very clear.
This chunk provides an example of personal risk perception. It illustrates that regardless of an individual's beliefs, actions such as smoking carry established risks. The example emphasizes the contrast between objective risk (the actual danger of smoking) and perceived risk (how individuals interpret that danger).
Imagine a friend who thinks drinking energy drinks is harmless because they're marketed as safe. While they feel invulnerable, the reality is that excessive caffeine can lead to health issues. This illustrates how personal beliefs can overshadow the objective risks revealed by scientific studies.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Risk: The probability of an adverse event occurring within a certain timeframe.
Objective Risk: Calculated based on scientific methods and quantitative data.
Perceived Risk: Reflects how individuals interpret risk based on personal beliefs.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The distinction between smoking and its health risks: scientifically high, but perceived differently by some individuals.
Driving without a seatbelt: statistically dangerous, yet many perceive it as a low risk.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Ricks and risks might sound alike; one’s a feeling, and one’s just right.
Imagine a bridge builder who weighs his materials against floods. He believes the bridge is strong, but the townsfolk fear storms. Here, science meets perception in building that bridge safely.
Remember OP: Objective is Data, Perceived is Belief.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Objective Risk
Definition:
Risk determined through scientific measurements and estimations.
Term: Perceived Risk
Definition:
Risk as interpreted by individuals based on personal beliefs and perceptions.
Term: Risk Assessment
Definition:
The process of identifying and evaluating risks associated with a particular situation.