Practice Guidelines for Civil Engineers Regarding Fault Zones - 21.19 | 21. Geological Faults | Earthquake Engineering - Vol 2
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What is the main reason for avoiding construction near active faults?

💡 Hint: Think about what happens during an earthquake.

Question 2

Easy

Name one example of a zoning law related to fault zones.

💡 Hint: Consider laws designed to protect areas near faults.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

Why should civil engineers avoid constructing buildings near active faults?

  • To improve aesthetics
  • To minimize earthquake risks
  • To enhance property values

💡 Hint: Consider the outcomes during an earthquake.

Question 2

Seismic microzonation analyzes how local conditions can amplify shaking. True or False?

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about the importance of local environmental factors.

Solve 2 more questions and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a potential dam site located near an active fault, outline the steps an engineer should take to ensure its safety.

💡 Hint: Think about both geological safety and structural integrity.

Question 2

Evaluate the effectiveness of zoning laws in limiting construction near fault lines. Discuss potential improvements.

💡 Hint: Consider both benefits and limitations of the laws.

Challenge and get performance evaluation