Problems of Piecing Together the Past
In studying the Harappan civilization, archaeologists rely heavily on material evidence like pottery, tools, and ornaments, rather than inscribed texts. Organic materials such as cloth and wood have usually decomposed, making the survival of artefacts like stone and metal essential to our understanding. Often, only broken or discarded items are found, leading to the possibility that many significant objects were lost or hoarded and never retrieved.
Classifying Finds
The process begins with classification based on materials and functions of discovered artefacts. Understanding an artefact’s purpose is informed by its shape, context, and comparison to present-day items. For instance, distinguishing whether a specific item is an ornament or a tool can be complex without contextual evidence.
Problems of Interpretation
Speculation arises when attempting to discern religious practices from unearthed objects, such as the interpretation of certain figurines as 'mother goddesses' or the significance of seals depicting possibly ritualistic scenes. Researchers often relate Harappan symbols to much later religious practices and deities, leading to debates about their accuracy.
Essentially, much remains speculative about Harappan civilization's social organization, religious beliefs, and economic activities due to the sparse and complex nature of the archaeological record.