5.3. Constraints of Cohesive Networks

Here, we consider 3 kind of group or the source of information for people, one is the cohesive groups that depends on the degree and frequency of the tie or interactions okay so given, so how do you decide the cohesive groups; it is just a matter of that how frequently the individuals within a group is connecting. Let us imagine that this is a community okay, this is a society, this in entirely a one community.

Cohesive groups are identified by how frequently individuals connect with each other. This means that people who interact often and have strong ties form cohesive groups. In any community, there are various networks formed by people's interactions, which can affect how they share and receive information. An example of a cohesive groups is a close-knit community where neighbors regularly talk and share updates. High interaction frequency can enhance the flow of information within the group.

Think of a basketball team. Team members communicate frequently during practices and games, forming strong bonds. This close relationship allows them to share tips, strategies, and support each other both on and off the court, leading to improved performance.

So, what is the role of cohesive networks, with whom I have direct connections, every day I am meeting, talking face to face personal relationship like my friends, some are saying that it provides you the opportunity and social obligation, it is kind of, it also help you to collect that if I know something from outside or from any from televisions or mass media, I immediately pass the informations to my direct network partners like my friends, my neighbours, my co-workers with whom I am very intimate, it is cohesive.

Cohesive networks revolve around direct connections that individuals have with one another. These connections allow for opportunities to share information very quickly. For example, if someone hears about a new technology that reduces disaster risks, they are likely to share this valuable information with their close friends and family. This creates a ripple effect where information flows quickly among those who interact frequently.

Consider how news spreads in a small town. If one person hears a rumor, they might quickly share it with their friends, who then share it with their families. This rapid sharing can happen because of the close bonds among the townspeople, resembling how cohesive networks operate.

So, it actually helps to provide faster information, sharing not only that is not only working as the learning, social learning through passing the information very fast but also it provides a kind of obligations, pressure, social pressure, if 5 of my friends are using the rainwater harvesting tank or an earthquake-resistant building, it becomes my moral duty or social pressure I feel that I should have also the same.

Cohesive networks not only facilitate the rapid sharing of information but also create a sense of social obligation. If many friends or close associates adopt a certain technology or method, others in the network may feel pressured to comply. This social pressure can motivate individuals to make similar choices in order to feel included or accepted within their social circles.

Imagine a group of friends who all decide to join a gym together. As they share their workout experiences and successes, one friend may feel obligated to join too, driven by the desire to fit in and not be left out. This reflects the social pressures that can arise within cohesive groups.

Otherwise, I cannot be member of them, member of their group, I feel isolated not easy, so deviant behaviour it could be considered so, I should follow that one so, social obligation is very important in case of a social, a cohesive group case but it provides another constraint of this one that you cannot grab the new idea, it is the information is actually in the same group so, you have the same kind of gossip you know the same information is coming and going coming and going.

While cohesive networks provide benefits like quick information sharing, they can also have limitations. One major constraint is that individuals may feel pressured to conform to the group's existing beliefs and practices. This homogeneity within a network can lead to a lack of exposure to new ideas or innovative solutions, as members often share similar information and perspectives.

Consider a book club where all members prefer the same genre. If one member suggests a completely different genre, they might feel discouraged to share it, fearing that others will not be interested. As a result, the club may miss out on exploring various literature options, highlighting how cohesive networks can limit exposure to new ideas.

--