Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's dive into the role of social networks in disaster preparedness. Why do you think they are important for gathering information?
I think social networks help people share experiences and knowledge during disasters.
They can also encourage more people to adopt safety measures through peer influence.
Exactly! Social networks create a platform for sharing insights and encouraging collective action. This collective behavior is crucial during a disaster.
So, how do people typically gather this information through their networks?
Great question! Individuals often rely on three types of information: observational knowledge, discussions, and what they hear through various media.
Can you give an example of how this works in practice?
Absolutely! For instance, in Bangladesh, communities discuss rainwater harvesting practices to overcome water scarcity. Through these discussions, information is shared and behaviors are influenced.
That makes sense! It's like they are all working together for a common goal.
Exactly! To recap, social networks help in gathering essential information and foster community-driven solutions for disaster preparedness.
Let's talk about the three types of knowledge that individuals typically seek to make informed decisions. Who can name one?
Observational knowledge is one type, right?
Yes! Observational knowledge refers to what one learns through seeing and experiencing new technologies. What’s another type?
Knowledge through discussions with others?
Correct! Discussions allow personal opinions and subjective experiences to influence decision-making. And the last type?
What about auditory information, like what we hear from the media?
Spot on! This auditory information can come from news or community meetings where innovations are discussed. Why do you think all three types are important?
Because it gives a well-rounded understanding of the innovations before making a decision.
Exactly, well done! Integrating these perspectives is key to effective decision-making, especially in crisis situations.
Now, let’s discuss cohesive networks. How would you define a cohesive network?
It’s a group where people have strong, frequent ties, like friends or family.
Exactly! These types of networks help share critical information quickly. Can anyone tell me a downside of cohesiveness?
Maybe they limit exposure to new ideas since everyone shares similar thoughts?
That's right! While these groups can speed up information sharing, they might also restrict new perspectives. How can people overcome this?
By reaching out beyond their close network to gather diverse opinions?
Exactly! Expanding your network is vital to accessing a broader range of information, which can lead to better-informed decisions.
So, having both close and distant networks is beneficial.
Correct! Diverse connections enrich the information pool, enhancing understanding and adaptability in crisis situations. Let’s summarize key points: cohesive networks provide quick information but can limit exposure to new ideas, necessitating a balance in networking.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section discusses how social networks facilitate the acquisition of essential information for disaster preparedness, detailing the types of information individuals seek and the influence of cohesive networks in decision-making. It reflects on case studies, particularly in Bangladesh, where innovative practices like rainwater harvesting can benefit from community engagement and information sharing.
In this section, the discussion focuses on the critical role social networks play in disaster preparedness. As elaborated in previous lectures, effective disaster recovery relies heavily on the accurate and timely availability of information. Social networks serve as a means to collect, disseminate, and process this vital information.
Through a case study in Bangladesh, where water scarcity issues are prevalent due to arsenic contamination and salinity, the speaker emphasizes how innovative solutions like rainwater harvesting can be adopted at the community level. Social networks are essential for fostering the necessary discussions and passing on information that can lead to widespread adoption of such technologies.
The presenter outlines three types of information crucial for decision-making in adopting new practices: 1) observational knowledge regarding the hardware and software of potential innovations, 2) knowledge gained through discussions with peers about personal experiences and subjective validation, and 3) auditory information gathered from various discussions and media.
Further, the speaker introduces the concept of 'cohesive networks'—groups of individuals who share strong, frequent ties—which facilitate both the rapid sharing of information and social obligation through collective behavior. While cohesive networks may initially limit exposure to new ideas due to their closed nature, they play an important role in reinforcing social pressure to adopt common practices. Ultimately, expanding one's network beyond immediate, cohesive groups is recommended to access diverse opinions and information sources crucial for informed decision-making.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
People need three kinds of information: hardware and software knowledge from hearing and observation, subjective opinion about innovations from discussions, and contextual understanding of the innovations within their community.
Individuals seeking to adopt innovative solutions, like rainwater tanks, require three types of information. First, they need 'hardware and software knowledge,' which includes understanding the physical aspects and functionality of the innovation. This knowledge is typically acquired through direct observation or by hearing about the innovation from others. Second, they seek 'discussion knowledge,' which encompasses subjective perspectives from peers about the innovation's effectiveness and relevance. Finally, contextual understanding is crucial, as it helps individuals relate the innovation to their local circumstances and needs.
Imagine you want to buy a new smartphone. You first look up its specifications (hardware knowledge) and read product reviews (software knowledge). After that, you discuss it with friends to hear their experiences and recommendations. This combined information helps you make a more informed decision.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
People rely on social networks to gather information because networks provide diverse perspectives and reduce uncertainty when making decisions about adopting innovations.
Social networks are crucial for information gathering, especially in the context of innovations. When individuals are unsure about a new product or idea, they turn to their social circles to seek opinions and experiences. This process minimizes uncertainty—they share their findings through discussions or recommendations. As people connect with a broader network, they obtain varied insights that can either support or question their initial decisions, ultimately aiding them in making more informed choices.
Think about how you might decide on a restaurant to visit. If you only ask two friends, you might get limited or similar recommendations. However, if you share your query on social media, you may receive a wide range of options and opinions from numerous acquaintances, leading to a better decision.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Information can be obtained from various sources: direct personal relationships (friends and family), indirect connections (friends of friends), and competitors (co-workers). Each contributes uniquely to the information an individual receives.
Understanding where to gather information is essential. Personal relationships often provide direct and trusted information. In contrast, weaker ties, like acquaintances or connections beyond one’s immediate circle, can offer new insights and ideas. Competitors can also serve as valuable sources since they may have undertaken similar decisions and can provide alternative perspectives. By engaging with diverse connections, people can gather a wider array of information that may influence their decision-making.
When planning a vacation, you might first ask your close friends for their experiences (direct sources), but then realize that by reaching out to acquaintances or friends of friends who travel often, you can discover less common but potentially exciting destinations and tips that your immediate circle might not have considered.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Cohesive networks offer fast information sharing and social obligations but may limit exposure to new ideas, resulting in redundant information cycles.
Cohesive networks, consisting of closely connected individuals, facilitate rapid information exchange. This closeness fosters a sense of social obligation; if peers engage in certain behaviors or adopt innovations, members feel compelled to follow suit to fit in. However, this tight-knit structure can also hinder individuals from receiving diverse insights, as the same ideas circulate within the group, leading to information redundancy. To avoid this, it is crucial to seek information from outside the cohesive group as well.
Consider a book club made up of your close friends. You might all recommend popular mainstream books, which leads to enjoyable discussions but limits the diversity of reading material. If a member ventured outside the group to discover new genres or authors, the club could enrich its reading list with fresh ideas not otherwise encountered in their close circle.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Cohesive Networks: Groups where individuals have strong, frequent ties that encourage information sharing.
Observational Knowledge: Knowledge gained by seeing innovations in practice.
Discussions Knowledge: Information derived from conversations about experiences and opinions.
Auditory Information: Knowledge from what individuals hear, including media and community dialogues.
Social Obligation: The perceived duty to conform to behaviors within a group.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In Bangladesh, discussions within communities about rainwater harvesting lead to increased installations among families, showcasing the role of cohesive networks.
When people ask friends for advice before making purchases, they rely on discussions knowledge to feel confident in their decisions.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
When networks are tight and friends are near, information flows quick, that's perfectly clear.
Imagine a village where everyone talks about how to collect rainwater. One person installs a tank because their friends all have one, leading to many others following suit, illustrating how cohesive networks drive behavior.
To remember the types of knowledge, think 'OAD' - Observational, Auditory, Discussions.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Cohesive Networks
Definition:
Groups consisting of individuals with strong and frequent ties, facilitating quick and effective information sharing.
Term: Observational Knowledge
Definition:
Knowledge acquired through seeing and experiencing practices or technologies.
Term: Discussions Knowledge
Definition:
Information gained from conversations with others, reflecting personal opinions and experiences.
Term: Auditory Information
Definition:
Knowledge obtained from listening to discussions, media, or other sources of information.
Term: Social Obligation
Definition:
The pressure felt by individuals to conform to group behaviors or norms.