Professional Courses
Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Categories
Interactive Games
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Typing
Memory
Math
English Adventures
Knowledge
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Increasing and Decreasing Subsequences
Unlock Audio Lesson
Today, we are discussing subsequences within a series of distinct real numbers. Can anyone tell me what strictly increasing and strictly decreasing sequences are?
A strictly increasing sequence is where each number is larger than the previous one, like 1, 2, 3.
Exactly! And what about strictly decreasing sequences?
That would be where each number is smaller than the one before it, like 3, 2, 1.
Great job! Now, remember that in a sequence, subsequences can skip numbers. For instance, in the sequence 5, 3, 7, 1, we can form a subsequence like 5, 7. It's crucial to grasp this flexibility!
Applying the Pigeonhole Principle
Unlock Audio Lesson
Now, let's delve into the pigeonhole principle. If we have + 1 distinct values, and they can only fit into pairs, what can we conclude?
There must be at least one pair of values that share similar longest subsequence properties!
That's correct! If each pair can only have a maximum identified length, the principle indicates that a repetition will occur, confirming our subsequence lengths.
So, there's a contradiction if we assume every subsequence length fits within this limit?
Precisely! This contradiction helps us establish that at least one subsequence must exceed it, validating our original assertion.
Proving Existence of Subsequences
Unlock Audio Lesson
Given a sequence, how can we showcase that it always contains an increasing or decreasing subsequence of length + 1?
We can start by organizing our values and analyzing subsequences starting from different points in the sequence.
Excellent! By tracking our increasing and decreasing lengths for each starting point—what must happen if they all remain below the stated bounds?
It means we can find a contradiction based on those lengths vs. the total elements we started with.
Exactly right! So to conclude, we demonstrate that at least one subsequence must stretch beyond this limitation, proving our hypothesis!
Conclusion and Overarching Implications
Unlock Audio Lesson
In summary, the existence of either an increasing or decreasing subsequence in any sequence of distinct reals is universally true.
It shows how powerful certain mathematical principles are!
And how we can use contradictions to strengthen our arguments in mathematics.
Absolutely! Understanding these concepts enhances not just mathematical reasoning but also our problem-solving skills in broader contexts.
Introduction & Overview
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
Quick Overview
Standard
The section explores the fundamental principle that within any sequence of distinct real numbers, one can always find a subsequence of a specific length that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. By leveraging concepts like the pigeonhole principle and proof by contradiction, the section illustrates how to derive this conclusion universally.
Detailed
Detailed Summary of 'Contradiction and Conclusion'
In this section, the focus is on proving that for any sequence of + 1 distinct real numbers, there exists a subsequence of length + 1 that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. The proof utilizes concepts such as strictly increasing and decreasing subsequences and the pigeonhole principle, emphasizing the universality of the statement across different arbitrary sequences.
The discussion begins with definitions: a strictly increasing sequence is one where each subsequent term is greater than the preceding term, while a strictly decreasing sequence is the inverse. Subsequences are explained as non-consecutive selections from the main sequence, which is crucial as it allows flexibility in identifying the increasing or decreasing nature of selected values.
To prove the key assertion, the teacher outlines a misunderstanding of limits on subsequence lengths by using arbitrary elements in the sequence and notes the maximum lengths of increasing and decreasing subsequences. Approaching the proof through contradiction, it indicates that if each value's longest subsequence is capped at a particular length, it leads to more values than the limits, creating an inevitable overlap—a classic application of the pigeonhole principle. Thus, the conclusion drawn is the guaranteed existence of at least one subsequence that either exceeds this maximum or contradicts the assumptions made. This elegant use of contradiction solidifies the claim's validity across sequences of real numbers.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to the Problem
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here we want to show the following that you take any sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers. They are arbitrary real numbers; may be positive, negative in any order you take them. The only condition is that they have to be distinct. Then the claim is that irrespective of the \( n + 1 \) real numbers that you have in your sequence you always have a subsequence of length \( n + 1 \) which is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
Detailed Explanation
This chunk introduces the central idea of the proof that from any sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers, you can always find a subsequence of the same length that is either monotonically increasing or decreasing. This means that no matter how you arrange the numbers, the claim holds true for them. An increasing sequence is one where each number is larger than the previous, while a decreasing sequence has each number smaller than the previous one.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you have a set of different heights for people: 5 feet, 6 feet, 5.5 feet, and 5.8 feet. No matter the arrangement, you can always select a group of four people that is either all arranged from shortest to tallest (increasing) or from tallest to shortest (decreasing).
Defining Subsequences
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
First of all what is a strictly increasing sequence? A sequence of the form (\( a_1, a_2, ... \)) where \( a_1 < a_2 < a_3 < ... \). Whereas if I have a sequence of the form (\( a_1, a_2, a_3, ... \)) where \( a_1 > a_2 > a_3 ... > a_{k} \) then it is a strictly decreasing sequence.
Detailed Explanation
The concept of subsequences is essential for understanding how we can extract ordered elements from a given sequence. A strictly increasing subsequence means that each subsequent number is greater than the previous one, while a strictly decreasing subsequence means that each number is lower than the one before it. This clarity helps when searching for longer ordered sequences within a larger collection.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a race where each runner's finishing times are recorded. If we select runners who finished in increasing order of their times, we're forming an increasing sequence. Conversely, if we select runners based on their finishing times in decreasing order (the slowest finishes first), we’re forming a decreasing sequence.
Subsequence Definition and Properties
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now what does a subsequence mean? A subsequence means that the values may not be consecutive. That means I am allowed to miss a few numbers. For example, say I take a sequence 1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8 and so on. Then I can choose to pick 1 and then exclude 3 and 0 and -5. This is a subsequence. In the same way I can pick a subsequence saying 3, 2 and 8 that means I skip 0, I skip -5.
Detailed Explanation
A subsequence is essentially a selection of elements from the original sequence that maintains the original order but does not need to be consecutive. The examples highlight how we can freely choose certain numbers while ignoring others which still preserves the order of their appearance in the sequence.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you’re reviewing a list of groceries: apples, bananas, carrots, dates. You can choose some items like apples, carrots, and dates, skipping bananas. The result forms a subsequence of your grocery list without needing to follow the exact order or select every item.
Claim on Subsequences
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
What this question basically says is that irrespective of the way your \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers are chosen you always have a subsequence.
Detailed Explanation
This emphasizes the core claim that regardless of the particular distinct numbers you start with, there will always exist a subsequence of specific length with the property of being either entirely increasing or completely decreasing. It sets the scene for the proof which will explain how this can be shown.
Examples & Analogies
Picture a classroom with students of various sizes. Even if you randomly select to stand different students, you will be able to sort them to find a group where some are consistently shorter or taller without needing to stand them in a line.
Using the Pigeonhole Principle
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So let the arbitrary sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers be denoted by \( a_1, a_2, ..., a_{n + 1} \). What I will do is to prove this statement, I will use the pigeonhole principle along with proof by contradiction.
Detailed Explanation
The proof begins by formally denoting the sequence of distinct numbers and aims to prove the statement using the pigeonhole principle. This principle suggests that if you have more 'pigeons' (in this case, possible lengths of subsequences) than 'holes' (the maximum values), at least one 'hole' must contain more than one 'pigeon', leading to the conclusion of repeated lengths either being increasing or decreasing.
Examples & Analogies
Suppose you have five cars parked in four parking spaces. If we assume one car can't be in more than one space, at least one space must contain more than one car, illustrating how overlaps (or in this case, dependencies) occur naturally in constrained systems.
Reaching a Contradiction
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Assume that the statement is false and that means for each \( a_i \) in the sequence, the value \( L_i \) is at most \( n \). That means you take any number in the sequence the maximum length increasing subsequence is at most \( n \) and the maximum length decreasing subsequence is also of length \( n \).
Detailed Explanation
Assuming the opposite of the claim is key for contradiction proofs. If we assume every increasing and decreasing length is capped at \( n \), it leads to a logical inconsistency where we will have more sequences than available options, which is a violation of the pigeonhole principle, indicating that our initial assumption must be incorrect.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine if a classroom only has three chairs but six students. If I claim that every student with a book can only sit individually and each has to take a chair, I reach a point where it becomes impossible to seat all six without exceeding three, demonstrating the impossibility of my statement.
Contradicting the Assumption
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
On the other hand if I take the case when \( a_j > a_k \) then I have to just give a symmetric argument. What I claim is if you take that subsequence and put an \( a_j \) at the beginning, then that now gives me a new decreasing subsequence.
Detailed Explanation
In trying to derive a contradiction, we explore both outcomes (if one value is greater than another and vice versa). This showcases how the longer subsequences can always keep being formed despite assumptions of maximum lengths, illustrating the inherently recursive nature of the sequences and thus affirming the claim.
Examples & Analogies
Consider again the height example. If we keep adding taller students to a lineup, we will end up contradicting the initial boundaries set since we can always find new arrangements of increasing or decreasing heights within our group.
Conclusion
Unlock Audio Book
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
That means there is at least one \( a_i \) where either \( L_i \) is greater than \( n \) or \( D_i \) is greater than \( n \). I do not know what exactly is that \( a_i \). So I gave you a non-constructive proof here.
Detailed Explanation
The conclusion reinforces that at least one of the subsequences must exceed the initial assumption, proving that our claim about subsequences of distinct real numbers is correct. The non-constructive proof emphasizes existence rather than the method of identifying that specific number, demonstrating a deeper understanding of mathematical proofs.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a treasure hunt where you know that somewhere in a large forest, there is at least one hidden treasure but you don't know its exact location. The assurance of its existence is enough to validate the search even if the exact coordinates remain ambiguous.
Definitions & Key Concepts
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
-
Pigeonhole Principle: If there are more items than categories, at least one category must contain more than one item.
-
Subsequence: A selection from a sequence that preserves order but does not require continuity.
Examples & Real-Life Applications
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Examples
-
In a sequence of numbers like 3, 5, 2, 8, it includes subsequences such as 3, 5, 8 (increasing) or 8, 5, 2 (decreasing).
-
For distinct numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, one might have subsequences of lengths 3 like (1, 2, 4) or (5, 3, 1).
Memory Aids
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
🎵 Rhymes Time
-
If a line is climbing high, always more, never shy; when it's falling down the slots, keep your eyes on what you’ve got.
📖 Fascinating Stories
-
Imagine a pigeon trying to fit in a certain number of nests, if it has more friends than nests, it must share!
🧠 Other Memory Gems
-
Increasing is like 'I up', decreasing is 'D down', and subsequence is 'skip around'.
🎯 Super Acronyms
SIS = Strictly Increasing Sequence, BMC = Below Maximum Capacity, PHD = Pigeonhole Principle Demonstration.
Flash Cards
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Glossary of Terms
Review the Definitions for terms.
-
Term: Strictly Increasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is larger than the previous one.
-
Term: Strictly Decreasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is smaller than the previous one.
-
Term: Subsequence
Definition:
A sequence derived from another by deleting some elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
-
Term: Pigeonhole Principle
Definition:
A principle stating that if you have more items than containers, then at least one container must hold more than one item.
-
Term: Proof by Contradiction
Definition:
A method of proving statements by showing that assuming the opposite leads to a contradiction.