Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we'll delve into the fascinating properties of sequences. Can anyone explain what we mean by a 'strictly increasing sequence'?
I think it’s a sequence where each number is less than the next, like 1, 2, 3.
Exactly! And what about a 'strictly decreasing sequence'?
That would be one where each number is larger than the next, like 3, 2, 1.
Great! Now, how would you define a subsequence?
A subsequence is like picking numbers from a sequence without changing their order?
Exactly right! Remember that subsequences can skip numbers but maintain order. This will be pivotal to our understanding today.
Now let's discuss the pigeonhole principle. Has anyone heard of it before?
Isn't it about grouping items into containers, where if there are more items than containers, at least one container must hold more than one item?
Absolutely! In the context of our sequences, think of each distinct increasing or decreasing subsequence's length as a pigeonhole. How many combinations do we create here?
We create pairs of lengths from the values we choose!
That's correct. With n+1 distinct values, the pigeonhole principle shows that not all can be uniquely paired, guaranteeing overlaps in subsequence lengths.
Now, let's explore how we can prove our main theorem using contradiction. What would we start with?
We assume the statement is false and that lengths are bounded by n.
Correct! By asserting that length is limited, what implications does this hold?
It suggests that we can’t form pairs that create a strictly increasing or decreasing nature.
Exactly! This leads us to a contradiction when we find more sequences than allowed lengths. Remember, this leads us back to our original claim: we must have a subsequence.
Can anyone think of real-life examples where recognizing order in a sequence is useful?
Maybe in analyzing trends over time, like stock prices?
Great example! Seeing that within a series of data helps identify patterns, just like our increasing or decreasing subsequences.
So, if we look at a list of historical event dates, we can find increasing patterns in terms of advancements?
Exactly! Real-world sequences often take on patterns aligned with our mathematical understanding.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The core concept herein is derived from the pigeonhole principle, showcasing how any sequence of n+1 distinct numbers will yield a subsequence of at least length n that is strictly increasing or decreasing. This principle highlights structured patterns in sets of numbers, validating the existence of such subsequences regardless of the chosen numbers.
This section engages deeply with the concept of subsequences within arbitrary sequences of distinct real numbers, emphasizing the theorem that any set of n+1 distinct real numbers includes a subsequence of length n that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. Initially, the terms 'strictly increasing' and 'strictly decreasing' are clearly defined, laying the groundwork for the argument.
The subsequence is explained as a selection from the original sequence where the order is maintained, but not necessarily the adjacency of elements. As the section progresses, the argument unfolds using the pigeonhole principle and a proof by contradiction to establish the theorem's validity. By setting up a scenario where each element in the sequence can be linked to its longest increasing or decreasing subsequence, the section illustrates that there must exist a scenario where at least one element will mean that the associated subsequences violate an upper bound, thus proving that an increasing or decreasing subsequence of length n cannot be avoided.
To encapsulate the concept, readers are prompted to consider that within any selected group of distinct values, inherent ordering will always produce a patterned output, thus ensuring that subsequences exist within the defined characteristics.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here we want to show the following: that you take any sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers. They are arbitrary real numbers; may be positive, negative in any order you take them. The only condition is that they have to be distinct. Then the claim is that irrespective of the \( n + 1 \) real numbers that you have in your sequence, you always have a subsequence of length \( n + 1 \) which is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
In this section, we are discussing a key property of sequences. Given any list of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers (which can be in any order), it is possible to always find a smaller ordered list (subsequence) where the numbers continuously rise (increasing) or fall (decreasing). This means that regardless of how the numbers are arranged initially, we can find at least one pattern of order among them.
Think of a group of students who are all of different heights standing in a random order. You can always find at least one smaller group of students standing in a line such that each student in line is taller than the one before them (increasing), or shorter (decreasing).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
First of all, what is a strictly increasing sequence? A sequence of the form \( (a_1, a_2, ...) \) where \( a_1 < a_2 < a_3 < ... \). Whereas if I have a sequence of the form \( (a_1, a_2, a_3, ...) \) where \( a_1 > a_2 > a_3 > ... \), then it is a strictly decreasing sequence.
A strictly increasing sequence is when each number is larger than the previous number. For example, in the sequence \( (2, 4, 6, 8) \), each number is greater than all the ones before it. Conversely, a strictly decreasing sequence contains numbers where each is less than the one before it, like in \( (10, 8, 6, 4) \). Understanding these definitions is crucial because they help us identify the patterns we are trying to find in any set of distinct real numbers.
Consider a race: if you wanted to determine if any runner consistently gained speed compared to the others, you would look for a strictly increasing sequence of their speeds at each marker. On the other hand, if a runner started fast but slowed down consistently, that would represent a strictly decreasing sequence of speeds.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now, what does a subsequence mean? A subsequence means that the values may not be consecutive. That means I am allowed to miss a few numbers.
A subsequence is a series of numbers selected from a sequence without changing their relative order. This means you can skip some numbers to form a new sequence while still retaining the original order of those chosen numbers. For instance, from the sequence \( (1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8) \), a valid subsequence could be \( (1, 2, 8) \) or \( (3, 2, 8) \), where the numbers do not have to be next to each other in the original sequence.
Think of selecting winners from a list of participating students in a talent show. The students performed on different days, and you don't have to select everyone who performed—you can pick few winners based on their performances - not in the order they performed.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Why I am taking arbitrary here? Because I want to prove this statement for every sequence. This is a universally quantified statement, and to prove a universally quantified statement, I can use the universal generalization principle by proving that a statement is true for some arbitrary element of the domain.
To validate the claim regarding subsequences, we assume that our selected sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers is arbitrary. By using the universal generalization principle, we demonstrate that our statement holds true regardless of the specific numbers chosen, thus affirming its universal applicability. This approach helps in establishing mathematical truths based on general cases, leading to broader conclusions.
Imagine a bakery that wants to ensure that all types of bread turn out delicious, regardless of the ingredients used. By testing one batch of each type and ensuring they all meet a standard, the bakery can confidently assert that all bread varieties will be tasty.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So let me first define two values. I define \( L_i \) as the length of the longest increasing subsequence starting at \( a_i \). One might be of length 1; a trivial increasing subsequence starting at \( a_i \) is the value \( a_i \) itself.
To help analyze the properties of increasing sequences, we denote the length of the longest increasing subsequence beginning at each number in our sequence. This helps in systematically determining how many increasing subsequences exist starting from any given number, thus laying the groundwork for identifying pairs of numbers that follow the subsequence condition within the entire set.
Think of a race where each runner can have their individual performance milestones tracked. Each runner (i.e., each number in the sequence) has a highest performance they achieved since the start of the race—this represents their 'longest increasing subsequence' starting from their current state.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
But how many numbers do I have in the sequence? I have \( n + 1 \) values in the sequence that I have chosen. That means I have more pigeons and less holes.
In employing the pigeonhole principle, we observe that we have \( n + 1 \) distinct entries for our subsequences. When we attempt to categorize this into increasing and decreasing subsequences, we will encounter a situation where the number of pairs (our 'pigeons') exceeds the available slots or categories (our 'holes') for those pairings. This oversaturation guarantees that at least one number must share a similar attribute—either its increasing or decreasing sequence with another number.
Imagine trying to fit 10 different colored candies into only 9 bags. Since there are more candies than bags, at least one bag must contains more than one candy. Similarly, in our sequence, at least one pair must exhibit the same subsequence behavior, either going up or down.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Pigeonhole Principle: Ensures that in any specific arrangement, overlaps occur when items exceed available groupings.
Subsequences: Remind us that ordering matters, while skipping does not, enabling flexibility in selections.
Increasing vs. Decreasing: Recognizing patterns in sequences assists in identifying mathematical validity.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
Example of a strictly increasing sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Example of a strictly decreasing sequence: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In a line so neat and fine, numbers rise, just like time.
Imagine a race where two runners climb steep hills — one always goes up; the other always goes down. They represent the patterns of sequences.
S.I. for Strictly Increasing, S.D. for Strictly Decreasing.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Strictly Increasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is less than the subsequent term.
Term: Strictly Decreasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is greater than the subsequent term.
Term: Subsequence
Definition:
A sequence derived from another by deleting some elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Term: Pigeonhole Principle
Definition:
A principle stating that if n items are put into m containers, with n > m, then at least one container must contain more than one item.