Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Welcome everyone! Today, we are looking to understand subsequences, specifically in the context of distinct real numbers. Can anyone tell me what a subsequence is?
Isn’t it a sequence formed from another sequence by deleting some elements without changing the order?
Exactly! A subsequence can skip elements and maintain their original order. Now, do you know the difference between a strictly increasing sequence and a strictly decreasing one?
A strictly increasing sequence has each term greater than the last, while a decreasing sequence has each term smaller than the last.
Great! So, if we have any sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers, we can always find a subsequence of length n that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. That’s our claim today!
Now, let’s dive deeper! We are going to use the pigeonhole principle here. Can someone explain what the pigeonhole principle is?
If you have more items than containers, at least one container must hold more than one item!
Exactly! In our case, the containers are the attributes of subsequences we can form. If each subsequence starting from an element has a length limited to n, and we have n + 1 real numbers, then we must have a repeated length. This guarantees concurrent subsequences!
Oh! So, it’s logically impossible for all lengths to be different because we simply have too many numbers.
That's right! So pairs of values must lead to either an increasing or decreasing subsequence.
What methods can we use to prove our claims about subsequences?
We could use proof by contradiction, couldn't we?
Exactly! So suppose that for each element in our sequence, the longest increasing and decreasing subsequence is at most of length n. Can anyone tell me what that would imply?
It means we can only organize them up to length n, while we have n + 1 elements.
So there must be a violation — we can't have both maximum lengths remain within the bounded limits!
Well reasoned! Thus we arrive at a contradiction, demonstrating that at least one subsequence must exist beyond this limit.
To sum up, we’ve established that no matter how we arrange n + 1 distinct real numbers, we’ll find subsequences of length n that are strictly increasing or decreasing. Why is this significant?
It helps us understand order within unstructured sequences!
Exactly! It’s a foundational concept in combinatorics. Remember - subsequence implications are broad and profound!
Thanks, that makes everything clearer!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section elaborates on subsequences in any sequence of n+1 distinct real numbers, proving there always exists a subsequence of length n which is either strictly increasing or decreasing. It employs concepts such as increasing and decreasing subsequences and the pigeonhole principle to demonstrate this result, alongside proofs by contradiction.
In this section, we explore the concept of subsequence existence within sequences of distinct real numbers. We define a subsequence as a series that may skip values, leading to two main categories: strictly increasing sequences, where elements are arranged such that each subsequent element is greater than the previous, and strictly decreasing sequences, with the opposite condition.
The central claim of this section is that, regardless of the arrangement of any chosen sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers, there exists a subsequence of length n that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. This is shown through a proof that utilizes the longest increasing and decreasing subsequences starting from any element of the sequence, denoted as 'a_i'. By linking these lengths to conditions that must lead to a contradiction if they are bounded by n, we demonstrate the existence of at least one subsequence that fulfills our requirement. Furthermore, the use of the pigeonhole principle assists in establishing that overlapping lengths will occur, thereby ensuring the desired subsequences exist. This result is crucial for combinatorial mathematics and lays the groundwork for more advanced concepts in sequence and order theory.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
First of all, what is a strictly increasing sequence? A sequence of the form \( (a_1, a_2, ...) \) where \( a_1 < a_2 < a_3 < ... < a_n \) . Whereas if I have a sequence of the form \( (a_1, a_2, a_3, ...) \) where \( a_1 > a_2 > a_3 > ... > a_n \) then it is a strictly decreasing sequence.
A strictly increasing sequence is a series of numbers where each number is larger than the one before it. For example, in the sequence \(2, 4, 6, 8\), each number is greater than the previous one. Conversely, a strictly decreasing sequence consists of numbers where each one is smaller than the last. For example, \(8, 6, 4, 2\) represents a strictly decreasing sequence.
Think of a ladder. If you step from one rung to the next that is higher, that's like an increasing sequence. If you are descending the ladder and moving from a higher rung to a lower one, it resembles a decreasing sequence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now what does a subsequence mean? A subsequence means here that the values may not be consecutive. That means, I am allowed to miss a few numbers. In the sense, say I take a sequence \(1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8\) and so on. Then I can choose to pick 1 and then exclude 3 and 0 and -5. This is a subsequence. In the same way, I can pick a subsequence saying 3, 2, and 8 that means I skip 0 and -5.
A subsequence is formed from a sequence by removing some elements without changing the order of the remaining elements. For example, from the sequence \(1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8\), you can create subsequences like\(1, 2, 8\) or \(3, 2\) by skipping certain elements but keeping the order intact.
Imagine you are selecting certain fruits from a basket without worrying about keeping the order. If you start with apples, bananas, oranges, and decide to only take the apples and oranges, you can say that apples or oranges form a subsequence of the original selection.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So what this question basically says is that irrespective of the way your \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers are chosen, you always have a subsequence. By that I mean that you have a set of \( n + 1 \) values going from left to right but need not be in consecutive locations; some of the locations might be skipped. But the number of values are \( n + 1 \) such that if you view those \( n + 1 \) values they are either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
The main idea here is that no matter what set of distinct real numbers you start with, there will always exist a subsequence consisting of \( n + 1 \) elements that are either in increasing or decreasing order. This fact is important and holds true for any set of distinct numbers, displaying a kind of inherent order within the chaos of randomness.
Consider a group of people standing in a line of different heights. No matter how they are arranged, you can always find a group of people whose heights can increase upwards or decrease downwards if you choose them wisely. This mirrors the idea of subsequences in the mathematical sense.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So let the arbitrary sequence of \( n + 1 \) distinct real numbers be denoted by \( a_1, a_2, ..., a_{n + 1} \). I will use the pigeonhole principle along with proof by contradiction.
In order to prove the existence of increasing or decreasing subsequences, a common approach is to use the pigeonhole principle combined with a proof by contradiction. The logic here is to assume that all subsequences are of limited length and to show that this leads to a contradiction, implying that our original assumption was wrong.
Imagine placing more pigeons than available houses to store them. If you have six pigeons but only five houses, at least one house must contain more than one pigeon. Similarly, in our proof, if we assume the contrary and find a contradiction, we will confirm that increasingly or decreasingly arranged subsequences must exist.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So assume that the statement is false and that means for each \( a_i \) in the sequence, the value \( L \) is at most \( n \). That means you take any number in the sequence the maximum length increasing subsequence of length \( n \) and the maximum length decreasing subsequence is also of length \( n \).
If we assume that all increasing and decreasing subsequences from the sequence of numbers can only be of size \( n \) or smaller, it sets up a situation where we can pair the lengths of these subsequences. Since we have more numbers in the sequence than pairs, the pigeonhole principle guarantees a contradiction by showing that at least one subsequence must exceed length \( n \).
Think about a shelf with too many books for the available space. If you claim that each shelf can only hold a certain number of books, but you have more books than shelves, logically at least some shelf must hold more books than allowed, signaling a contradiction in your original claim.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Subsequence: A derived sequence that skips some elements.
Strictly Increasing Sequence: A sequence where each next number is larger than the last.
Strictly Decreasing Sequence: A sequence where each next number is smaller than the last.
Pigeonhole Principle: Concept that ensures when you have more items than categories, there must be overlap.
Proof by Contradiction: A method of proving a statement by showing its negation leads to a contradiction.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In the sequence (3, 5, 2, 7, 6), a strictly increasing subsequence is (3, 5, 7) while (7, 6, 2) is strictly decreasing.
For the sequence (1, 4, 3, 2, 5), subsequences could include (1, 2, 5) for increasing or (5, 3, 1) for decreasing.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In a sequence where numbers play, some we might skip along the way.
Imagine a race where only the fastest runners continue. Each time a runner finishes at least a bit faster than before, we can see patterns of increasing speed.
When checking sequences: Is it I for Increasing, D for Decreasing?
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Subsequence
Definition:
A sequence derived from another sequence where some elements may be omitted without changing the order.
Term: Strictly Increasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is greater than the preceding term.
Term: Strictly Decreasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is less than the preceding term.
Term: Pigeonhole Principle
Definition:
A principle that states if n items are put into m containers, with n > m, at least one container must contain more than one item.
Term: Contradiction
Definition:
A logical statement that negates an assumption, demonstrating that it cannot be true.