Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's start with the Pigeonhole Principle. Can someone explain what it means in simple terms?
It's like if you have more pigeons than holes, at least one hole must contain more than one pigeon.
Exactly! Now, how can we apply this to finding subsequences in our sequence of distinct real numbers?
We can use it to prove that there has to be an increasing or decreasing subsequence.
Great! Remember that we can label increasing subsequence lengths as 'L' and decreasing as 'D'. We'll explore these concepts further.
In a sequence of n + 1 numbers, what do you think will happen?
I think at least one of the subsequences must be long enough to be increasing or decreasing.
Correct! And that’s the basis of our proof.
To summarize, we have established that the principle can show the existence of a subsequence of length n + 1 that is either strictly increasing or decreasing.
Now, let’s clarify what a subsequence is. Does anyone want to explain?
A subsequence takes some elements of a sequence but doesn't need to take all the adjacent ones!
Exactly! For example, in the sequence 1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8, if I take 1 and then skip some numbers, I create a subsequence.
So what matters is the order in which they appear?
Yes! The order must remain the same. What would a strictly increasing sequence look like?
It would be like 0, 2, 3, 5 where every subsequent number is bigger than the last.
Correct! And a strictly decreasing sequence?
That would be like 5, 3, 1 where every number decreases.
Exactly! So remember this as we prove the Pigeonhole Principle further.
Let’s talk about proof by contradiction. Who can give it a try based on what we've discussed?
Is it when we start by assuming the opposite of what we're trying to prove?
Yes! If we assume each subsequence's length is at most n, how can that lead to a contradiction?
If every number's subsequence is at most length n, then we can only map these lengths within n pairs.
Right! And since we have n + 1 distinct numbers, we can end up with the same subsequence lengths, violating our assumption.
So we reach a contradiction because we then must have one subsequence longer than n?
Exactly! You’ve got it. In summary, this process shows that our assumption is wrong and guarantees the existence of a subsequence of length n + 1.
Now, let's look at a concrete example. Who can provide a sequence of distinct real numbers?
How about 4, 1, 3, 2, 5?
Great! This contains 5 distinct numbers. What subsequences can we find?
We could pick 1, 2, 3 as increasing or 5, 4 as decreasing.
Perfect! So how do these examples validate the principle?
They show that regardless of the distinct sequence, a long enough subsequence must exist that is either increasing or decreasing.
Exactly! To summarize, we verified that no matter the sequence chosen, at least one long subsequence of either type exists.
Finally, can anyone think of an application of the Pigeonhole Principle in real life?
Maybe in organizing teams where we want to ensure some form of ranking?
Or identifying patterns in data, like finding trends in temperature over the days?
Both excellent points! The principle can be applied in various contexts, proving useful in organizing data and noticing trends.
So, to recap, the Pigeonhole Principle not only proves subsequences in math but also helps us in real-world applications like data analysis and pattern recognition.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The Pigeonhole Principle asserts that in any sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers, there exists a subsequence of length n + 1 that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. This principle is illustrated through a series of thoughtful proofs and examples, showing its utility in mathematical reasoning and beyond.
In this section, we explore the Pigeonhole Principle and its application in sequences of distinct real numbers. The principle states that for any given sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers, there must exist a subsequence of length n + 1 that is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing. We define strictly increasing and strictly decreasing sequences and clarify the concept of a subsequence, which does not require consecutive numbers. By leveraging the principle, we demonstrate through a proof by contradiction that at least one of the subsequences must exist. The explanation walks through the definitions, assumptions, and steps taken to prove the statement, making it clear and concise for students looking to grasp the Pigeonhole Principle in this context.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Here we want to show the following that you take any sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers. They are arbitrary real numbers; may be positive, negative in any order you take them. The only condition is that they have to be distinct. Then the claim is that irrespective of the n + 1 real numbers that you have in your sequence you always have a subsequence of length n + 1 which is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.
The problem begins by stating that we are considering a sequence of n + 1 distinct real numbers. These numbers can be any values, as long as they are not repeated. The key takeaway from the claim is that no matter how these numbers are arranged, there will be a subsequence consisting of n + 1 numbers that either increases or decreases throughout its length. This is a foundational concept in combinatorial mathematics and is often derived using the pigeonhole principle.
Think of a classroom with 11 students where each student's height is unique. No matter how you line them up, you can always find a group of 6 students who are either all increasing in height from left to right or all decreasing in height. It’s like trying to arrange your books on a shelf – you can’t escape creating one section that either goes from smallest to largest or largest to smallest.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
First of all what is a strictly increasing sequence? A sequence of the form (a1, a2, ...) where a1 < a2 < a3 < ... . Whereas if I have a sequence of the form (b1, b2, ...) where b1 > b2 > b3 > ... then it is a strictly decreasing sequence.
A strictly increasing sequence is one in which each number is larger than the preceding number. Conversely, a strictly decreasing sequence is one in which each number is smaller than the preceding number. Understanding these definitions is crucial as it sets the stage for recognizing the required properties of the subsequence we will be discussing.
Consider climbing stairs: when you step on each stair, you're moving up, which forms a strictly increasing sequence of your height as you rise. Now if you were to descend the stairs, your height would decrease as you step down, creating a strictly decreasing sequence.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now what does a subsequence mean? A subsequence means here that the values may not be consecutive. That means I am allowed to miss a few numbers.
A subsequence is derived from the original sequence by omitting some elements without changing the order of the remaining elements. For example, if we take the sequence {1, 3, 0, -5, 2, 8}, one possible subsequence could be {1, -5, 2}, which skips some numbers. This flexibility allows us to find the increasing or decreasing order required by the problem statement.
Imagine you are baking a cake and have a recipe that lists several ingredients in order. You don’t need to use all the ingredients; you can choose to skip some while still following the sequence of steps. Similarly, in our sequence, we can skip numbers but maintain their original order.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
By that I mean that you have a set of n + 1 values going from left to right but need not be in consecutive locations; some of the locations might be skipped.
The crux of the problem lies in employing the pigeonhole principle, which states that if you have more items (pigeons) than containers (pigeonholes), at least one container must hold more than one item. In this case, the containers represent the potential lengths of sequences, which are limited due to our defined maximum length (n). This principle is what guarantees the existence of an increasing or decreasing subsequence of the required length.
Imagine you have 11 different colored balls (the n + 1 numbers) and only 10 boxes (the possible heights or position values). When you try to put each ball in a box, at least one box will end up with two balls, much like how the sequences will have some overlap in increases or decreases.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Assume that the statement is false and that means for each ai in the sequence, the value L_i is at most n.
To prove the existence of an increasing or decreasing subsequence of length n + 1, we start by assuming the opposite. If we presume that each ai produces a subsequence that is limited to a maximum length of n, we can analyze the implications of this assumption. This leads us into a contradiction, as shown through the application of pairs and the pigeonhole principle, ultimately proving the claim.
Think of a classroom where each student can only reach the top shelf if there are only 5 shelves. If you assume every student can only reach up to the 5th shelf, but you have 6 students trying to reach, you will find at least one pair who can reach the same height, leading to contradictory outcomes. This illustrates how our assumption that all subsequences are limited in length must be incorrect.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Pigeonhole Principle: In any distribution of n + 1 items into n containers, at least one container must hold more than one item.
Subsequence: A derived sequence from logic where order is preserved but not necessarily consecutive.
Strictly Increasing: Each term in the sequence is greater than the previous term.
Strictly Decreasing: Each term in the sequence is less than the previous term.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In the sequence 2, 5, 3, 8, 1, both subsequences 2, 3, 5, 8 and 8, 5, 3 are possible.
Given 10 distinct real numbers, at least one subsequence must either be increasing or decreasing.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
If pigeons outnumber the holes, a crowded home often unfolds!
Imagine a birdwatching competition where each participant attempts to fit more birds into limited observation posts. Eventually, some posts must have multiple birds due to the restriction of posts versus participants.
Increasings with RISE (Recurrent Increasing Subsequence), Decreasing with FALL (Following A Losing Line).
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Pigeonhole Principle
Definition:
A fundamental principle in combinatorics stating that if n + 1 items are put into n containers, at least one container must contain more than one item.
Term: Subsequence
Definition:
A sequence derived from another sequence where elements can be taken in order but not necessarily consecutively.
Term: Strictly Increasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is greater than the preceding one.
Term: Strictly Decreasing Sequence
Definition:
A sequence where each term is less than the preceding one.