12.4.4 - Garbage Can Model
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to the Garbage Can Model
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we are exploring the Garbage Can Model of decision-making. It suggests that decisions often come about through random interactions rather than structured processes. Can anyone tell me what they think this might look like in an organization?
So, it's not a logical flow? Decisions just happen?
Exactly! It's more chaotic. Think of it like a garbage can where various problems and solutions are tossed in together. Sometimes the right solution ends up with the wrong problem.
What would cause this chaos in decision-making?
Great question! It often happens in loosely structured organizations where roles aren't well defined. Remember, in these systems, the right solution may not show up when needed.
Components of the Garbage Can Model
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let’s break down the model further. It includes problems, solutions, participants, and choices. Who can explain what one of these components means?
Problems are the issues that need to be resolved?
Yes, well done! And solutions are the responses to these problems, but they can also exist before a problem is acknowledged. Student_1, can you think of an example?
Maybe introducing a new software solution before knowing all the issues we face with the current one?
Spot on! That's a perfect example of how solutions can be available without clear recognition of a problem.
Decision-Making in Loosely Coupled Systems
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let's discuss how the Garbage Can Model applies to loosely coupled systems. In these environments, decision-making can be very decentralized. What do you think that means?
Does it mean that different parts of the organization might address the same problem differently?
Exactly! That's one possibility. It shows that the same problem could yield different decisions based on who is involved at that time.
So, it sounds like timing is very important in this model?
Yes, timing and opportunity play a significant role. Decisions can be made more by serendipity than by a structured analysis.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The Garbage Can Model reflects how decision-making can often be disorganized and unpredictable, particularly in loosely structured environments. Decisions arise from a mix of available solutions and unresolved problems, rather than a rational approach, making the model relevant in understanding complex organizational dynamics.
Detailed
Garbage Can Model
The Garbage Can Model of organizational decision-making challenges traditional notions of rationality, suggesting that decisions often emerge from chaotic and random interactions within organizations. Developed by Cohen, March, and Olsen in 1972, this model posits that organizations are often like garbage cans filled with problems, solutions, participants, and choices.
Key Components of the Model
- Problems: Unresolved issues that require decision-making.
- Solutions: Answers or strategies that may not yet have a defined problem attached.
- Participants: Individuals or groups involved in the decision-making process.
- Choices: Options available for decision makers at any given time.
Interaction Dynamics
In a garbage can setting, decisions are made not by a straightforward evaluation of options but rather through a mix of timing, opportunity, and luck. For instance, a solution may be proposed for a problem that was not yet recognized, leading to decisions that may not directly address the significant issues at hand. This model is particularly relevant in organizations where the structure is loose, and roles can be ambiguous.
Organizational Types
- Loosely Coupled Systems: Organizations where activities are not highly integrated or dependent on each other, allowing for varied responses to issues based on participant involvement.
The Garbage Can Model is significant in revealing that sometimes, decisions are less about logic and more about the circumstances surrounding them. This insight can aid in the understanding of decision-making within complex and dynamic environments.
Youtube Videos
![Garbage can model of decision making | Organizational decision making [Game of theories #20]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/F7iPVDly4Fo/mqdefault.jpg)
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Overview of the Garbage Can Model
Chapter 1 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
• Decisions result from random interactions of problems, solutions, participants, and choices.
• Common in loosely structured or chaotic environments.
Detailed Explanation
The Garbage Can Model proposes that decisions in organizations do not always follow a structured path. Instead, they arise from a mix of problems, solutions, and the people involved at any given moment. This can lead to unpredictable decision outcomes, particularly in environments that lack clear organization and structure, such as startups or crisis scenarios.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a brainstorming session where team members throw out ideas without a clear agenda. Solutions (ideas) get mixed up with various issues (challenges the team faces) and the dynamics of how team members interact. Sometimes, a random comment may spark a brilliant idea that addresses a problem, although it initially seemed unrelated.
Characteristics of Loosely Structured Environments
Chapter 2 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
• Common in loosely structured or chaotic environments.
Detailed Explanation
Loosely structured environments, such as those found in innovative startups or during a crisis, exhibit high levels of uncertainty and chaos. In these settings, the interactions between problems and solutions are informal and spontaneous. This creates opportunities for creative solutions to emerge but can also lead to confusion and indecision if not managed carefully.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a start-up company where employees often wear multiple hats. In one meeting, they might discuss everything from marketing strategies to product development without a defined plan. This informal, dynamic approach can foster innovative ideas, yet also risk decisions being made on a whim, potentially leading to misalignment with the company's overall objectives.
Decision-Making in the Garbage Can Model
Chapter 3 of 3
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
• The decision-making process is haphazard and not linear.
• It blends problems, solutions, and participants in unpredictable ways.
Detailed Explanation
In the Garbage Can Model, decision-making is depicted as a chaotic interplay between varying elements: problems that need solving, available solutions, the people involved, and the choices they make. This non-linear approach means decisions might be made based on who is available to discuss an issue rather than a methodical assessment of the options. As a result, the decisions can sometimes appear random and may not always address the core issues effectively.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a chaotic family dinner where multiple conversations happen at once. One relative may discuss a problem with a leaky roof, while another brings up a solution they read about. Meanwhile, a third family member who is just listening might offer an unrelated but helpful suggestion. The output of this chaotic conversation could lead to a decision about getting a professional to fix the roof, blending various ideas and perspectives in a way that might not have occurred in a more structured discussion.
Key Concepts
-
Garbage Can Model: A model that illustrates decision-making as a function of random interactions in organizations.
-
Loosely Coupled Systems: Systems where independent units can make decisions without coordination, leading to varied outcomes.
-
Participants: Individuals contributing to the decision-making process.
-
Problems and Solutions Interaction: How solutions may arise independently of recognized problems.
Examples & Applications
An organization facing multiple unresolved employee grievances, while a management solution to offer training sessions becomes available, even though not all grievances are directly related to training.
A tech startup where multiple innovative solutions are proposed at a brainstorming session, but no clear problem or project requirement is established at that time.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
In a can full of ideas, solutions may roam, Waiting for problems, to find their home.
Stories
Imagine a kitchen where chefs toss ingredients (solutions) into a pot (garbage can) without a recipe (problem). Sometimes, a delicious dish emerges, but often it's a mix of randomness!
Memory Tools
P.S.P.C. - Problems, Solutions, Participants, Choices. Remember these four key elements of the Garbage Can Model!
Acronyms
G.C.M. - Garbage Can Model. A fun way to recall the chaos in decision-making!
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Garbage Can Model
A decision-making model that emphasizes the role of randomness and chaos in organizational decision processes.
- Loosely Coupled Systems
Organizations where components operate independently and decisions can be made in a decentralized manner.
- Participants
Individuals or groups involved in the decision-making process.
- Problems
Issues or situations that require decisions to be made.
- Solutions
Responses or resolutions available for problem-solving in decision scenarios.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.