11.7 - SOLID Principles in OOP
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Today, we will discuss the first principle of SOLID: the Single Responsibility Principle, or SRP. Can anyone tell me what they think this principle means?
I think it means that a class should only do one thing.
Exactly! A class should have only one reason to change. This helps in keeping our code base clean and manageable. Can anyone think of an example where a class violates this principle?
Maybe a class that handles both database operations and user interface logic?
That's a great example! When a class has multiple responsibilities, it becomes hard to maintain. Remember, SRP can be summarized with the acronym 'ONE': 'One Responsibility, One Change'.
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let's move on to the next principle: the Open/Closed Principle. Who can explain what that entails?
I think it means we should be able to add new features without changing existing code.
Correct! OCP essentially encourages us to extend existing code rather than modify it directly. Why might this be beneficial?
It helps prevent bugs in the existing functionality, right?
Exactly! We can use interfaces or abstract classes to achieve this. Remember, think of 'CLOSED' as a door that we shouldn’t open unnecessarily.
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let’s dive into the Liskov Substitution Principle. What does it mean if a derived class can substitute its base class?
It means we can use the subclass wherever the parent class is used, without breaking the application?
Exactly! This maintains the integrity of your application. Can anyone give me a real-world analogy for it?
Maybe like how a bicycle is a type of vehicle, and you can use it wherever a vehicle is expected?
Perfect analogy! Remember, if your subclasses don’t honor the expectations of your base class, you’re violating LSP.
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Next, let’s talk about the Interface Segregation Principle. What do you think this principle suggests?
I think it says that we shouldn’t force clients to depend on interfaces they don't use.
That’s exactly right! By keeping interfaces specific and tailored, we reduce the risk of change influencing unintended areas. Can you think of a scenario where a large interface might cause issues?
What if a class had to implement methods that it didn’t actually use?
Exactly! We should strive for smaller interfaces, making them more manageable. Think of it as 'SMALL', 'Manageable Interfaces for Clients'.
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Finally, let’s discuss the Dependency Inversion Principle. Can anyone share what they know about it?
It’s about high-level modules not depending directly on low-level modules?
Yes! Both should depend on abstractions instead. Why is this principle significant?
It allows for more flexible and scalable designs, since you can swap out implementations without affecting high-level code.
Exactly! Remember, think 'DEPEND', as Dependencies should be inverting!
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The SOLID principles consist of five key principles that guide developers in conforming to best practices for software design in OOP. These principles enhance code maintainability and scalability by addressing common pitfalls in software development.
Detailed
Detailed Summary of SOLID Principles in OOP
The SOLID principles are a set of design principles that help software developers create more understandable, flexible, and maintainable software systems. The acronym SOLID stands for:
- Single Responsibility Principle (SRP): A class should have only one reason to change, meaning it should only have one job or responsibility. This principle encourages the separation of concerns, making systems more modular and easier to manage.
- Open/Closed Principle (OCP): Software entities (classes, modules, functions, etc.) should be open for extension but closed for modification. This means that the behavior of a module can be extended without editing its source code, promoting better code stability and the ability to add new functionality.
- Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP): Derived classes should be substitutable for their base classes without affecting the correctness of the program. This principle ensures that a subclass can stand in for its parent class, guaranteeing that it maintains the expectations of its supertype.
- Interface Segregation Principle (ISP): Many client-specific interfaces are better than one general-purpose interface. This encourages developers to create narrow interfaces that are tailored to the needs of specific clients.
- Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP): High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions. Additionally, abstractions should not depend on details; details should depend on abstractions. This principle helps in creating systems that are more flexible and easier to adapt to changes.
By adhering to these principles, developers can build systems that are easier to understand, test, and maintain over time.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Introduction to SOLID Principles
Chapter 1 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The SOLID principles help design scalable and maintainable OOP systems.
Detailed Explanation
The SOLID principles are a set of five design guidelines that help developers create systems that are easy to manage, extend, and understand. These principles contribute significantly to making the software more scalable, which means it can grow and handle increased demands without requiring a complete rewrite.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine building a company. If every department is distinct and has its own responsibilities (like marketing, finance, and production), it’s easier to manage and scale. Similarly, the SOLID principles help organize software components so they can evolve and adapt as new requirements emerge.
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Chapter 2 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
- S – Single Responsibility Principle
Detailed Explanation
The Single Responsibility Principle states that a class should only have one reason to change. In other words, each class should focus on a single task or responsibility. If a class does more than one thing, it can become more complex and harder to maintain. By adhering to this principle, when a requirement changes, it’s far less likely to affect other parts of the system.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a chef who specializes in baking pastries. If they also start preparing sushi, they could get overwhelmed and make mistakes. Instead, by focusing solely on pastries, they can perfect their craft and ensure high quality.
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Chapter 3 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
- O – Open/Closed Principle
Detailed Explanation
The Open/Closed Principle states that software entities (like classes, modules, and functions) should be open for extension but closed for modification. This means you should be able to add new functionality without changing the existing code, which reduces the risk of introducing bugs in already working parts of the system. This can often be achieved through interfaces or abstract classes.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a smartphone which allows you to install new applications. The core system remains intact while you keep adding new features through apps. This way, you enhance the phone’s functionality without changing its original operating system.
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Chapter 4 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
- L – Liskov Substitution Principle
Detailed Explanation
The Liskov Substitution Principle asserts that objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of a subclass without affecting the correctness of the program. This means that if class B is a subclass of class A, you should be able to use B wherever you use A. If this is not true, the inheritance hierarchy might need to be re-evaluated.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine you have a universal remote control for various devices like TVs and projectors. If you replace a TV with a projector, the remote should work seamlessly without changing how you operate it. This is akin to the LSP in programming, ensuring that derived classes can stand in for their base classes.
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Chapter 5 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
- I – Interface Segregation Principle
Detailed Explanation
The Interface Segregation Principle states that no client should be forced to depend on methods it does not use. This means that interfaces should be specific to a client’s needs rather than being a one-size-fits-all. By breaking large interfaces into smaller ones, you can ensure that each client only has to implement what it needs.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a restaurant menu. If a menu lists every dish in the world, customers may get overwhelmed and confused. A streamlined menu catering to customer preferences (like vegan, gluten-free, etc.) makes for a better dining experience, much like specific interfaces improve usability in software.
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Chapter 6 of 6
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
- D – Dependency Inversion Principle
Detailed Explanation
The Dependency Inversion Principle posits that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules but rather both should depend on abstractions. Furthermore, abstractions should not depend on details; rather, details should depend on abstractions. This principle encourages decoupling, making systems more flexible and easier to test.
Examples & Analogies
Think of electric appliances and the power supply. Appliances (high-level modules) rely on a standardized power source (abstraction) rather than individual power sources (low-level modules). This means any appliance can work with any compatible power supply, enhancing flexibility and usability in day-to-day operations.
Key Concepts
-
Single Responsibility Principle: A class should have a single responsibility.
-
Open/Closed Principle: Classes should be open for extension but closed for modification.
-
Liskov Substitution Principle: Subclasses should be substitutable for their parent classes.
-
Interface Segregation Principle: Interfaces should be specific to clients' needs.
-
Dependency Inversion Principle: High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules.
Examples & Applications
An Employee class that processes payroll but also manages employee records violates SRP by having multiple responsibilities.
Using interfaces for payment methods allows adding new payment types without modifying existing code, adhering to OCP.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Simplicity in mind, just one job in kind (SRP), Extend, don’t mend (OCP), Substitute with ease, don’t make classes freeze (LSP).
Stories
Imagine a factory where each worker has a specific role (SRP); they can add new machines without changing the workers' roles (OCP). Each machine type can be used interchangeably (LSP); and the workers don't have tools they don't need (ISP). Machines use tools from a common source (DIP).
Memory Tools
Remember 'SOLID': S for Single responsibility, O for Open/Closed, L for Liskov Substitution, I for Interface segregation, D for Dependency Inversion.
Acronyms
SOLID – S
Single
O
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A software design principle that states a class should only have one reason to change.
- Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
A principle stating that software entities should be open for extension but closed for modification.
- Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
A principle indicating that objects of a superclass should be replaceable with objects of a subclass without affecting the application.
- Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
A principle suggesting that no client should be forced to depend on methods it does not use.
- Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
A principle that advises against high-level modules depending on low-level modules, instead advocating both depend on abstractions.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.