Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today, we'll discuss how to compute the number of possible paths in a grid! Can anyone tell me how we might define reaching point (i,j) from (0,0)?
Do we just count the steps we can take to get there?
That's a good start! Remember, in our grid, we can only move up or right. So, we can come to (i,j) either from (i-1,j) or (i,j-1). Each way represents a unique path. Let's represent that with an acronym: R for Right and U for Up!
So if I’m at (i,j), I just add the paths from left and below?
Exactly! Paths(i,j) = Paths(i-1,j) + Paths(i,j-1).
What happens at the edge of the grid?
Great question! Those boundary conditions are crucial. For instance, if we reach the first row or first column, there's only one way to go, either straight right or straight up. Memory aid: think of it as 'No way but one on the edge!'
So at the start point (0,0), there’s just one way, right?
Exactly! Always one way to remain still at the start! Let’s summarize: To find paths at (i,j), look back to paths from your left and below, noting boundary conditions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now let's discuss how we handle holes or obstructions in our paths. Does anyone remember how we treat paths through these holes?
I think we just ignore those paths.
Correct! We declare paths through holes as zero. So if a path wants to reach a point with a hole, it can’t. We avoid adding paths coming from that direction. Memory aid: '0 Paths in Holes!'
Does that affect the neighboring points?
Exactly! Any point directly adjacent to a hole will only count paths from valid directions. Let's ensure we remember this: holes break connections!
So we’ll ignore any contributions from holes in our calculations?
Precisely! Let’s summarize: holes render paths to them zero and impact adjacent path calculations by limiting them.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
In our exploration of grid paths, we must consider efficient computation methods. Can anyone define memoization?
Isn't it where we store results to avoid recalculating them?
Exactly! We keep track of results we've calculated. Now, what about dynamic programming?
Isn’t that like a systematic way of solving problems by breaking them down into smaller pieces?
That's right! Instead of calculating paths recursively multiple times, we build up from smaller subproblems iteratively. A good memory aid is 'DP: Diligently Progressive!'
Which method is better?
Good question! While memoization saves time on repeated calls, dynamic programming often performs better in terms of both computation time and memory, as it calculates values systematically. To summarize: Use memoization for quick storage and revisit dynamic programming as a thorough calculation method.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Let’s visualize a grid to understand dependencies clearly. If I have a grid, how would we fill in the number of paths?
We start from (0,0) and fill row by row, right?
Exactly! Starting from (0,0), the process involves calculating paths moving through the grid sequentially to fulfill our relation. We can also adjust for holes as you fill in!
Can we calculate it by doing columns too?
Yes! Both methods lead to the same results; each has its computational style. However, most commonly, row by row is simpler. Remember: paths grow through systematic filling!
So, different topological sorting impacts our calculations?
Very much so! Always ensure that in calculating, previous dependencies are already computed, whichever sorting you choose. Let’s wrap up: Visualize your grid and remember to inspect connections!
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section provides an inductive framework for calculating paths in a grid, discussing how paths to a given point are determined by considering paths from adjacent left and bottom points. It also highlights boundary conditions, the influence of holes on path calculation, and contrasts memoization with dynamic programming for efficient computation.
In this section, we explore the inductive formulation of grid paths—specifically, how to compute the number of different paths to reach a specific point (i,j) on a grid from the origin (0,0). To reach (i,j), you can only come from either the point immediately left (i,j-1) or below (i-1,j). The total number of paths to (i,j) is therefore the sum of paths to those two points. We establish some boundary conditions, where the paths from the leftmost column and the bottom row only derive paths from one direction. The base case is vital as there is exactly one path to the starting point (0,0). Additionally, we can easily handle obstacles or 'holes' in the grid by declaring paths through those points to be zero—effectively ignoring paths that want to cross through the holes. We then discuss the recursive nature of the computation and potential performance issues due to repeated calculations. This can be optimized using techniques like memoization or dynamic programming, which anticipates and solves dependencies iteratively.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us look for a better solution. So, as you might guess, since we are looking at these kind of inductive formulations and recursive programs, what we are really looking for is the inductive formulation of the grid path. So, let us ask ourselves the following question. How do I get to a point (i,j) on the grid?
This section introduces the concept of finding a way to reach a specific point (i,j) on a grid using inductive reasoning. The goal is to establish a clearer method to determine how many different paths can lead to that point from the starting point (0,0). By recognizing the problem mathematically, we can build a recursive framework for solving it.
Imagine you are navigating through a city grid to reach a friend's house. You can only walk right or up, and you want to find different routes. This is similar to finding paths on a grid where paths exist only through specific directions.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
I can either come right from the neighbor on my left (i,j minus 1) or from (i minus 1,j) going up once. So, if I have any paths starting at (0,0), then by taking one step, that path extends to (i,j). Every path from (0,0) to (i,j-1) can be extended in a unique way to (i,j), and similarly from (i-1,j).
To reach a point (i,j), there are two potential approaches based on previous steps. You can either come from the left neighbor (i,j-1) or from below (i-1,j). By understanding that these extensions create unique paths, we lay the groundwork for representing the overall path count leading to (i,j). Each existing path can contribute to forming a new path.
Think of a staircase: if you’re on step (i,j), you can get there by stepping up from the step below (i-1,j) or by stepping over from the step to the left (i,j-1). Each step taken from these points can be seen as extending a new possible route.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Let us write paths (i,j) to denote the number of paths from (0,0) to (i,j). The paths to (i,j) are the sum of paths to (i-1,j) and (i,j-1). There are some boundary conditions. For the leftmost column and bottom row, they derive only from the left or beneath due to the grid boundaries.
This chunk establishes that the total number of paths to (i,j) can be calculated by adding paths arriving from the two preceding points: left and below. The boundaries of the grid dictate that paths in the left column or bottom row can only be derived from one adjacent direction, either left or below. Properly setting up these initial conditions is crucial for effective path counting.
Imagine painting a fence where each section gets its color from the section next to it. If you're at the end of the row, there’s only one neighboring section to reference, just like how the paths can only come from one side in the boundary cases.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
At (0,0), the number of ways to stay at (0,0) is trivially one. It’s important not to consider this as zero as it would lead us to incorrectly conclude that there are no paths.
The initial condition at (0,0) is vital since it establishes a base case for our calculations. If we mistakenly declared that there are zero paths to this point, it would hinder all subsequent path counts due to dependency on this initial value. Hence, recognizing this trivial path ensures our calculations remain valid.
Consider a person beginning a journey; they have at least one way to be where they started—by simply not moving at all. Without acknowledging this starting position, the rest of the journey paths would make little sense.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
If there is a hole at some point, then the paths (i,j) will be declared 0. Regardless of neighbors, if a hole is present, no paths can pass through it, affecting its neighboring counts.
Introducing holes into the grid requires us to declare certain path values as zero. This decision alters path calculations around these holes, preventing any paths from being counted if they are obstructed. Holes influence their neighboring points by reducing path possibilities and must be factored into our calculations.
Imagine navigating a maze with walls. If there’s a wall, you can’t travel through that space, just as paths can't pass through holes in the grid. The presence of a wall effectively blocks certain routes from being valid.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The recursive computation can lead to inefficiencies, as certain calls repeat unnecessarily. To optimize, we can either use memoization or dynamic programming to solve subproblems in a structured way.
As we delve deeper into computation, relying solely on recursion can lead to multiple evaluations of the same grid points, leading to inefficiency. To bypass this, we can utilize either memoization—where results cache previous computations—or dynamic programming, which systematically computes necessary values in order. This structured approach enhances efficiency and reduces redundancy in calculating paths.
Think of a person calculating their total savings: instead of noting down each time they calculate how much they've saved weekly, they keep a record of their total savings, adding new amounts over time. This prevents redundant calculations and gives them a clearer view of their finances.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Understanding the dependencies as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) can help in determining the order of computation. Begin at (0,0), filling values based on dependencies.
Visualizing grid paths as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) allows us to clarify dependencies. The computation begins at the origin (0,0), propagating through valid paths while maintaining dependencies consistent. By charting this structure, we establish a clear method for filling values, ensuring that each necessary preceding calculation is executed before following.
Imagine a construction project where certain tasks can’t begin until previous tasks are complete. Just like how bricks need to be laid before a wall can be built, resolving dependencies logically in computations helps ensure everything proceeds in the correct order.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Paths(i,j) = Paths(i-1,j) + Paths(i,j-1): The formula to calculate the number of paths to a grid point.
Boundary conditions limit paths originating from edges with only one way to go.
Holes in the grid permanently obstruct paths, leading to valid paths calculated as zero.
Memoization saves complexity by storing previously computed results.
Dynamic programming enables systematic problem-solving through subproblem dependencies.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
To find the number of paths to (2,2), calculate as Paths(1,2) + Paths(2,1). If there's a hole at (1,1), we disregard contributions from that point.
Using dynamic programming, fill a grid iteratively, starting from (0,0), taking values from the left and below to compute paths through to the destination.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To the right and up we soar, through paths we seek to explore!
Imagine two friends trying to reach a treasure at (3,3). They can only move right or up, but if they find a big rock at (1,1), they must go around it.
RUP (Right, Up, Path)—a helpful trigger for remembering how to navigate.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Inductive Formulation
Definition:
A method of defining a sequence or structure recursively, particularly used in computing the number of paths in a grid.
Term: Grid Path
Definition:
A series of steps taken in a grid, usually involving movements up or to the right to reach a target point.
Term: Memoization
Definition:
An optimization technique where previously computed results are stored to avoid redundant calculations.
Term: Dynamic Programming
Definition:
A method of solving complex problems by breaking them down into simpler subproblems and solving them in a systematic order.
Term: Boundary Conditions
Definition:
Predefined values or rules that define how calculations should be performed at the edges of a grid.
Term: Holes
Definition:
Obstructions or points on a grid where paths cannot pass, affecting the calculation of possible paths.