Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Today, we are going to analyze how to compute paths from the origin to any point on a grid. Can anyone tell me what two directions we can move?
We can move either right or up.
Exactly! So when we want to find the number of paths to (i,j), which two paths can we consider?
From the left, (i,j-1), and from below, (i-1,j).
That's right! We can simplify our formula. Hence, the number of paths to point (i,j) can be determined by summing the number of paths leading to both neighbors. Can anyone help me formulate that?
It would be paths(i,j) = paths(i-1,j) + paths(i,j-1).
Perfect! Now let’s explore the importance of boundary conditions and how we define the base case at (0,0). Can anyone explain why it is crucial to know that there’s one path to (0,0)?
If we assume zero paths, then our calculations for other points would be incorrect.
Exactly! Maintaining a consistent base is key. Let’s summarize what we discussed: We can derive paths to (i,j) from its neighbors, and we need a base case, which is one path at (0,0).
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Now, let’s talk about what happens when we have holes or obstacles in our grid. What happens to the path count if there's a hole at (x,y)?
It would be zero because no paths can pass through it.
Correct! So, how do we apply this to our earlier formula?
If there’s a hole, we set paths(i,j) to zero, ignoring contributions from neighbors.
Exactly! Holes disrupt our paths, and we need to account for that. Why are these modifications important for calculating total paths efficiently?
Because they prevent incorrect path counts from propagating through the grid.
Well stated! The effective handling of these grid holes is what distinguishes our approach. Let’s review: holes at specific coordinates lead to zero paths being counted in our calculations.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Lesson
Next, we need to tackle the idea of memoization versus dynamic programming. Can someone explain how memoization helps our calculations?
It avoids recalculating the same paths over and over by storing results.
That’s correct! And what about dynamic programming? How does that differ?
Dynamic programming solves subproblems in a structured order, usually filling the grid iteratively.
Right again! Dynamic programming fills in every path in a grid, even those that may not be needed. Why would this matter in terms of efficiency?
It can potentially waste calculations if many points don't contribute to the final count.
Exactly! While memoization is more efficient at times, dynamic programming is often simpler to implement. So, to summarize: we discussed how memoization speeds calculations by avoiding repetition, while dynamic programming fills in the entire grid for systematic calculation.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section introduces the concept of calculating paths in a grid using an inductive formulation. It explains how paths can be extended from neighboring points and discusses the significance of base cases and obstacles, leading into the strategies of memoization and dynamic programming for efficient path counting.
This section delves into the methodology of calculating paths in a grid from the origin (0,0) to any point (i,j) using inductive reasoning. The key routes to (i,j) are identified as coming from either the left (i, j-1) or below (i-1, j). The concept of extending paths from these neighbors provides a clear basis for calculating the total paths to (i,j) as the sum of paths from these two sources.
Boundary conditions are established, particularly focusing on how the leftmost column and the bottom row derive their values. The critical base case is that there is one path from (0,0) to itself, as this ensures the integrity of path calculations.
Additionally, the section addresses complications such as 'holes' in the grid, which are points where paths are not possible. The approach to handling these obstacles is to declare the path counts for those points as zero, effectively propagating the absence of paths to their neighbors.
A significant challenge in this calculation is the potential for redundant computations when using a naive recursive approach. To optimize this, the section introduces two strategies: memoization and dynamic programming.
Dynamic programming is emphasized, demonstrated through a grid example with holes, explaining how one can compute paths row by row or column by column. The section highlights the differences between dynamic programming and memoization, particularly discussing performance implications and computational efficiencies.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us ask ourselves the following question. How do I get to a point (i,j) on the grid? So, I claim, that given our structure, which is, that we can go right or we can go up, there are only two ways I can come here. I can either come right from the neighbor on my left. So, from (i,j minus 1) I can make one step right and come to (i,j) or from (i minus 1, j), I can go up once there.
In this chunk, we're examining how to reach a specific point (i,j) on a grid. The key idea is that movement is restricted to either moving right or moving up. From (i,j), one can only arrive from the left neighbor (i,j-1) by taking one right step or from the bottom neighbor (i-1,j) by taking one upward step. Thus, for every unique path that leads to either of those neighbors, we can extend it by one step to reach (i,j).
Think of a simple grid as a city block, where you can only walk along the streets that go either north or east. If you want to get to a store located at the corner of a block (i,j), you can only arrive there from the person coming from the block directly west of you or the block directly south of you. This illustrates how paths are formed in our grid model.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, let us write paths (i,j) to denote the number of paths from (0,0) to the current point (i,j). So, what we have just seen from our inductive analysis on the problem is, that if you are at (i,j), then the paths come from left or from below. So, the paths to (i,j) are the sum of paths to (i minus 1,j) and the paths to (i,j minus 1).
Here, we define a function paths(i,j) which signifies the number of ways to travel from the starting point (0,0) to (i,j). Based on our previous understanding, the total number of paths to (i,j) can be calculated by adding the number of paths coming in from the left (i,j-1) and the paths coming in from below (i-1,j). This creates a recursive relationship that allows us to compute the total paths efficiently.
Imagine a game where you need to collect treasures located at various points on the board. Each point can be reached only by stepping into it from the left or from below. To figure out how many ways there are to reach a specific treasure, you simply add up all the ways to get to the treasures directly next to it!
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, if you look at our grid, in general, then if we look at the leftmost column, let us start the bottom row. So, we start the bottom row, right, then we know, that this is of the form (0,0), then (1,0) and so on to (5,0), right. So, anything of the form (i,0) derives its value only from the left because there is no corresponding row from the left. Similarly, from the leftmost column, from this (0,0), (0,1) and so on up to (0,15).
Boundary conditions refer to the special cases at the edges of the grid. For any point in the leftmost column (like (i,0)), the only way to reach it is from the point directly to its left; since there are no points above it, those values depend solely on the leftward neighbors. Similarly, points in the topmost row can only be reached from below, relying on information from the previous row.
Using our earlier city block analogy, think of a street that runs along the edge of a lake. If you want to reach points on the edge of the lake (the first column), you can only step to those points by moving directly from another point on the same street to the left, since there’s no road leading up from the lake.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And finally, you have to ask ourselves what happens at the initial conditions. So, if I am at (0,0) and I want to go to (0,0), how many ways are there? Well, this is a trivial path, there is only one way, by just staying there.
The initial condition checks how many unique ways we can begin our journey at the starting point (0,0). Since there's no movement involved, the only way to 'get to' (0,0) is to simply remain at that spot. Thus, we define paths(0,0) = 1 to establish a solid foundation for calculating paths to other points in the grid.
Imagine you are standing still in your living room; you can say there's exactly one way to be in your living room without moving! This establishes your starting point for any adventures you plan to take to get to different rooms—or squares in our grid.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, how do we deal with holes in this setup? That is easy, we just say, that whenever there is a hole at a given point we just declare paths(i,j) be 0. In other words, if there is a hole at some point, then this thing is going to contribute 0 regardless of what is above or below.
Holes in the grid represent obstacles that block any possible path. When a hole exists at a location (i,j), we set paths(i,j) to 0 because no paths can pass through it. This condition ensures that while calculating the total paths, any path attempting to go through that hole will be effectively ignored, thereby propagating zero values to any cells dependent on it.
Consider a blocked road in the city that prevents any travel. If there’s a construction zone at a particular intersection (like a hole), no one can pass that way! Hence, it effectively becomes zero pathways for anyone trying to access areas that rely on this route.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So, we have seen before, we have two technologies to deal with this. So, one is memoization where we just make sure that we have never paths(i,j) the same value of i and j more than once. The other way is to, is to anticipate the sub problems, figure out how they depend on each other, then solve them directly iteratively in a suitable order and this is what we call dynamic programming.
This segment outlines two techniques for optimizing how we calculate paths: memoization, which stores already computed values to avoid repeating calculations, and dynamic programming, which takes a broader approach. Dynamic programming involves analyzing how sub-problems relate and solving them in a systematic sequence so that each problem is addressed just once.
Think of memoization like jotting down your previous steps in a recipe so you won’t have to figure them out again. In contrast, dynamic programming is like preparing all the ingredients before you start cooking—having everything organized and ready allows you to cook efficiently without doubling back.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Inductive Formulation: The process of defining paths based on prior values from adjacent points.
Boundary Conditions: Conditions set to determine values for pathways at the edges of a grid.
Holes: Points in the grid that disrupt paths and necessitate specific calculations to account for zero paths.
Memoization: Storing previously calculated path values to optimize recursive calculations.
Dynamic Programming: Filling in a grid efficiently by computing paths iteratively.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
To calculate paths to point (2,2), we consider paths from (1,2) and (2,1), summing their values.
In a grid with a hole at (1,1), paths to (1,1) become zero, propagating that zero value to adjacent calculations.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
From left or below, that’s how we go, to reach (i,j), let the path flow!
Imagine a traveler at a starting point. They can only move right or up to reach their destination. If a wall obstructs their route, they cannot go through, and their journey must adapt.
P.L.B - Paths depend on Left and Below neighbors; think of Paths forming through Left-Below connections.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Path
Definition:
A specific route taken to traverse from one point to another on a grid.
Term: Grid
Definition:
A two-dimensional array that represents points where paths are calculated.
Term: Memoization
Definition:
A technique for improving the efficiency of recursive algorithms by storing previously calculated results.
Term: Dynamic Programming
Definition:
An optimization method for solving complex problems by breaking them into simpler subproblems.
Term: Base Case
Definition:
The simplest instance of a problem which can be solved directly without recursion.
Term: Holes
Definition:
Specific points in a grid that cannot be traversed, effectively setting their paths to zero.
Term: Induction
Definition:
A method of mathematical proof where a statement is proven true for all natural numbers.