Practice Interpolation and Estimation of Missing Rainfall Data - 7.5 | 7. Rain Gauge Network | Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering - Vol 1
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What does the Arithmetic Mean Method entail?

💡 Hint: Think about how you calculate an average.

Question 2

Easy

When do we use the Normal Ratio Method?

💡 Hint: Consider the percentage difference.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What does the Arithmetic Mean Method primarily use to estimate missing rainfall data?

  • Surrounding station values
  • Weather patterns
  • Historical data

💡 Hint: Think about how averages work.

Question 2

Does the Normal Ratio Method rely on the uniformity of rainfall?

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Consider what 'normal' means.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

A station recorded 120 mm while two nearby stations recorded 100 mm and 130 mm. Calculate the missing rainfall using the Arithmetic Mean Method.

💡 Hint: Add the values and divide by the total number of stations.

Question 2

You have stations A, B, C reporting 50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm respectively. How would you estimate the missing data using the Inverse Distance Method assuming A is 1 km away, B is 3 km away, and C is 5 km away?

💡 Hint: Ensure to calculate contributions based on inverse distance.

Challenge and get performance evaluation