36.1.1. Introduction to R-C circuit frequency response

So, welcome back to this R-C circuit frequency response after the short break.

(Refer Slide Time: 00:31)

So, similar to the C-R circuit again here what you are doing is that we are taking the circuit into Laplace domain, namely the impedance of both the elements we are going in Laplace domain for C it is and this is directly same as this R. And then input it is V in Laplace domain s and then the corresponding output also we are considering in Laplace domain which is V (s).

Frequency response describes how a circuit responds to different frequencies of input signals. In this case, we are examining an R-C (resistor-capacitor) circuit by transforming it into the Laplace domain. The inputs and outputs of the circuit are expressed in terms of a complex variable s, which helps in analyzing systems. The relationship between the input and output voltage, denoted as V(s), can illustrate the circuit's behavior across a range of frequencies.

Consider a tuning fork ringing at different pitches. The frequency response of the tuning fork describes how it vibrates and produces sound at each pitch. Similarly, the R-C circuit's frequency response shows how it reacts to various input frequencies.

And, if we analyze this circuit what you are getting here it is V (s) = . So, from that what your yeah what you are getting is = . It is similar to the previous circuit except of course, we do not have the sRC part rather in the numerator we do have simply 1.

Now, to get the frequency response as I said for the previous case what you have to do, we have to take this replace this s by jω or rather I was having say sigma part in s which I am making it 0.

The transfer function V(s) is essential for understanding how the circuit will behave in response to different input signals. It indicates how the input voltages convert to output voltages based on the characteristics of the components (resistors and capacitors). We derive the frequency response by substituting the s variable with jω (where j is the imaginary unit, and ω is the angular frequency), effectively moving from the Laplace domain to the frequency domain. Ignoring the sigma part results in analyzing the pure frequency response.

Imagine a roller coaster ride where the height of the roller coaster corresponds to various input signals and the resulting thrill corresponds to the responses of the circuit. The transfer function acts like the roller coaster's mechanical design that determines the thrill level (output) based on the ride's height (input signals).

Now, this transfer function in Fourier domain again you can make the gain plot and the phase plot to get the frequency response.

So, again here what you can do? We can plot the magnitude. So, if we consider the | | and with respect to ω. So, if you see here at low frequency; if we ignore this part with respect to 1, then the corresponding magnitude it is 1. But then if you go to higher and higher frequency and if this part it is dominating over this 1, then the magnitude wise what we will be seeing here it is 1 by ω nature.

The frequency response can be represented through gain and phase plots. The magnitude of the transfer function indicates how much output will result from a given input (the gain) at various frequencies. At low frequencies, the output is roughly equal to the input, while at higher frequencies, the output decreases as the impedance of the capacitor increases, leading to an output that behaves like 1/ω. This transition from high to low magnitude behavior defines the circuit's low-pass characteristics.

Think of a water pipe where water flows freely at low pressure but may struggle to flow at higher pressures due to increased resistance. At low frequencies, the R-C circuit lets signals pass easily, just like water at low pressure, whereas at high frequencies, the circuit begins to restrict the signal, similar to how a smaller pipe restricts water flow.

So, I should say if I call this is ω at ω 1 what you are getting is that ω RC = 1 which means ω = . So, if I consider the actual curve instead of considering this two asymptotic or approximated curve will be getting the actual curve going like this. So, here again, it is having complementary behavior as I said with respect to the previous one.

We identify a specific frequency (ω1) where the product of the frequency and the time constant (RC) equals 1 (ωRC = 1). At this frequency, we observe a significant change in circuit behavior. Below this point, the circuit allows signals to pass through with minimal attenuation, while beyond this point, the circuit increasingly attenuates higher-frequency signals. This distinctive behavior is indicative of the R-C circuit's design, where its purpose is to filter frequencies.

Imagine a classroom where students can freely discuss ideas during a low-pressure discussion session (low frequency). As the discussion becomes more intense (higher frequency), individuals start to struggle to make themselves heard, akin to how the R-C circuit filters out noise.

Now, the similar to the previous case here again we can make the phase plot and then the if you consider the phase plot at very low frequency this part it is almost 0. So, we do have 0 phase shift.

So, if you consider it is phase then at low frequency it will be 0° and then as we are approaching towards this ω , then the this part it will be more and more prominent and then at ω 1 that will be equal to it is magnitude wise it will be 1 and so, it will be jω.

To fully understand how the circuit modifies signals, we can analyze the phase response alongside the gain. The phase plot shows the shift of the signal in time relative to the input signal. At very low frequencies, there is no phase shift (0°), meaning the output signal follows the input directly. As frequencies increase, this phase shift gradually changes, indicating how the circuit delays or alters the input signal timing.

Consider a marching band where individuals are supposed to follow a lead drummer. At a slow pace, they march in sync; however, as the drummer speeds up, there might be slight delays in their responses, resembling the phase shift in the circuit where signals lag behind the input.

So, we need to change this scale into logarithmic form and magnitude also we like to change in logarithmic form.

So, whatever we get is the Bode plot. So, here again in the Bode plot what will be seen it is similar to the previous case that if you consider ω in log scale then of course, 0 frequency it will be pushed to ∞ distance and then this one part it will be coinciding with 0 dB.

To analyze the frequency response effectively over a wide range of frequencies, we often use a Bode plot, which displays gain and phase shift on a logarithmic scale. This format makes it easier to observe how the circuit behaves across different frequencies. Specifically, it allows us to clearly identify the corner frequency, where the gain transitions and is typically represented as a -3 dB point on the graph.

Imagine a musician scaling a grand piano. Playing lower keys may sound soft and easily resonant, while higher keys sound sharper but may lose resonance. The Bode plot helps visualize this behavior in a cleaner, more understandable form, illustrating how the 'softness' or gain of the circuit changes with different 'notes' or frequencies.

--