Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
In Kiruna, several key stakeholders are involved in the relocation of heritage buildings. Can anyone name them?
Is it the LKAB mining company?
Yes, great! LKAB is indeed one of the stakeholders. What about others?
I think Kiruna Kommun is involved too.
Exactly! The Kiruna Kommun provides administrative support. Now, can anyone tell me about the railway's role?
I assume the railway land's role is about transport and logistics?
Correct! All these entities have interdependent roles that shape the relocation process. Remember the acronym 'KLK'—for Kiruna, LKAB, and the railway to help you recall the key players.
How do these relationships affect the decision-making process?
Excellent question! We'll discuss this more extensively as we go. To summarize, we identified LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the railway as the main stakeholders in Kiruna's heritage relocation.
Let's shift to the concept of heritagisation. Does anyone know what it means?
Is it about recognizing and preserving cultural heritage?
Exactly! Heritagisation involves recognizing certain buildings or areas as significant. In Kiruna, this began formally with a conservation plan in 1984. Can someone share what re-heritagisation might refer to?
It sounds like reaffirming the significance of already recognized heritage?
That's right! As they prepare for relocation, certain buildings are emphasized even more. This is why understanding the jargon is crucial. Now, what about de-heritagisation?
Great insight! De-heritagisation indeed refers to the rejection or downgrading of previously designated heritage. Remember: HERITAGE stands for Heritage, Emotional ties, Relocation, Importance, Transformation, Accountability, Generation, and Evaluation to help keep concepts clear.
How do these processes impact local communities?
They profoundly affect community identity and belonging, which we'll explore next.
Now, let's explore cultural controversies in Kiruna. What do you all think is at stake when discussing which history to preserve?
It’s about what kind of future narrative we want for Kiruna, right?
Absolutely! The narratives we choose shape how future generations view Kiruna. Can anyone think of an example of this?
Maybe the old miner’s house or railway history has more significance than newer developments?
That's a critical point! This is where the emotional aspect ties in. The phrase ‘heritagisation’ encompasses not only tangible buildings but the collective memory and identity tied to them. Remember: the phrase 'Story of Kiruna' represents the themes we've discussed, which can guide your thoughts.
How do these decisions get made?
Involvement from multiple stakeholders complicates the process, leading to debates on whose interests get prioritized. To summarize, cultural narratives significantly impact the planning and future of Kiruna, involving emotional and historical considerations.
Lastly, let’s consider the practical challenges of moving heritage buildings. What challenges do you think they might face?
The costs of relocating old buildings would be enormous, right?
Very true! The financial implications can limit what buildings get relocated. Can anyone identify another issue?
Weather conditions in Kiruna are quite extreme, which could delay projects!
"Spot on! Harsh weather presents significant challenges. Additionally, who’s responsible for these costs? That confusion can lead to further complications for communities and stakeholders alike.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section delves into the actor-network perspective related to the relocation of heritage in Kiruna. It discusses the roles and relationships between key stakeholders, the processes involved in heritagisation, and the significances of historical narratives within the context of cultural conservation and modernization.
This section examines the intricate dynamics at play in Kiruna, Sweden, as it undergoes a significant relocation of its heritage structures due to mining activities. It reflects on the actor-network perspective, wherein various stakeholders, including the LKAB mining company, Kiruna Kommun, and local communities, interact in a complex web that influences the preservation and relocation of cultural heritage.
This comprehensive analysis serves not only to elucidate the complexities involved in Kiruna's heritage relocation but also as a case study reflecting broader themes in cultural management and urban planning.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
This chunk highlights the emotional and social significance of heritage buildings within a community. Demolishing such buildings is not just a physical act; it involves dismantling a part of the community's identity and memory. These structures symbolize belonging and history, making the process of changing or relocating them sensitive and complex.
Think about your childhood home. It's not just a building; it's filled with memories and emotions. Now imagine if that home had to be torn down. You wouldn't just lose a house; you'd lose a piece of your past. Similarly, communities feel deeply about their heritage buildings.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And Jennie Sjoholm what she did was try to really put together and she tried to analyse you know what is the purpose of this whole document and how are they related to the conservation of these heritage buildings.
In this part, Jennie Sjoholm plays a crucial role by analyzing various reports and documents concerning heritage conservation in Kiruna. She seeks to connect the purpose of these documents with the actual conservation efforts, indicating that the protection of heritage buildings requires a collaborative approach among various stakeholders.
Imagine a group project at school where everyone has different ideas about what to do. To succeed, you need someone to coordinate and analyze everyone's input to create a unified plan. Similarly, Jennie helps organize and understand the fragments from different stakeholders to preserve Kiruna's heritage.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In 1984 what you can see here is like it is all the red dots which are actually talking about the designated areas you know they are all the listed buildings around, and there is a conservation plan which has been adopted in 1984.
This chunk refers to the conservation plan adopted in 1984 for protecting listed buildings in Kiruna. The plan identifies designated areas, represented by red dots, where efforts will be made to conserve important heritage sites. Such plans are crucial for maintaining community identity amid changes.
Think of a school preservation club aiming to keep the school garden because it's been a part of the school for decades. They create a plan showing which parts of the garden are most important to protect, much like the conservation plan designates important heritage sites in Kiruna.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And coming to the Heritagisation process I would like to emphasise on 3 important aspects one is a heritagisation, re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation.
The heritagisation process involves recognizing and elevating certain buildings and sites to heritage status. This can happen through the addition of new heritage sites (heritagisation), the reaffirmation of already respected sites (re-heritagisation), and the rejection of sites that no longer hold significance (de-heritagisation). This triad of processes indicates a dynamic approach to heritage conservation.
Think of trends in fashion. Some clothing styles become popular (heritagisation), while others might see a revival (re-heritagisation). However, some fashions eventually fade and are deemed outdated (de-heritagisation). Heritage works similarly with buildings, reflecting changing values and importance.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
there are always uncertainties, today yes we are planning for next 50 years we are preparing ourselves maybe after 50 years we may have to move to the next place but then…the general director of national heritage board also wrote in a debate article that you know the battle is about which history we will be able to tell about Kiruna in the future.
This part discusses the uncertainty involved in planning for the future of Kiruna as it faces relocation. The tensions between different stakeholders, such as the mining company, municipal administration, and local communities, complicate the decision-making process. The future storytelling aspect reflects the desire to preserve a narrative connected to heritage amidst change.
Imagine a family that needs to decide where to move due to changes in their neighborhood. They have to think about their history and what memories to carry forward with them, while also considering their future. In the same way, Kiruna must navigate its relocation while determining how to maintain its cultural narrative.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Actor-Network: Refers to the relationships between entities involved in a network, influencing the decision-making process.
Stakeholders: Key entities such as LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and local communities that hold interests in the outcome of the relocation.
Heritagisation: The recognition of buildings and sites of cultural significance.
Re-heritagisation: Processes that reaffirm the significance of cultural heritage during planning.
De-heritagisation: When a previously recognized heritage site loses its significance.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The relocation of the Kiruna Church involves careful planning and financial assessment, showcasing the costly nature of heritagisation efforts.
The recent debate over which historical narrative will guide Kiruna's future is illustrative of the cultural tensions present in the community.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In Kiruna town where stories lie, Heritage hugs as buildings cry.
Once in Kiruna, a miner dreamed of preserving his home. Through challenges of weather and cost, the community learned their history was priceless, needing everyone's voice—to not get lost.
HERITAGE: Heritage, Emotional ties, Relocation, Importance, Transformation, Accountability, Generation, Evaluation.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: ActorNetwork Perspective
Definition:
A theoretical framework focusing on the relationships and interactions between various stakeholders involved in a network.
Term: Heritagisation
Definition:
The process of recognizing and designating certain places or objects as culturally significant.
Term: Reheritagisation
Definition:
The affirmation and reinforcement of the importance of existing heritage structures during planning processes.
Term: Deheritagisation
Definition:
The process through which previously recognized heritage loses its significance or status.
Term: Stakeholders
Definition:
Individuals or groups that have an interest or investment in a project or scenario.