2 - Spatial Planning Complexities
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Understanding Stakeholders in Kiruna
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
In Kiruna, we have three main stakeholders: the LKAB mining company, the municipal government Kiruna Kommun, and the local community. Who can tell me what role each stakeholder plays?
LKAB is responsible for mining operations and funding the project.
The municipal government manages the administrative side and serves the local population.
The local community is affected by these decisions and has interests in preserving their heritage.
Exactly! We have a tripartite relationship. This means all three parties are interdependent to some extent. Can someone summarize this dependency?
The community depends on the LKAB for jobs, while the LKAB needs the government to facilitate their operations.
Great summary! Remember: interdependence means one stakeholder's success influences the others.
Heritagisation Process
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Let's discuss heritagisation. What does this term refer to in the context of Kiruna?
It refers to how certain buildings get recognized as heritage and how they can be preserved.
Right! It also involves relocating important buildings when necessary.
What if they decide these buildings aren't important anymore? What does that mean for our culture?
That would lead to de-heritagisation, which means removing that recognition. It's a crucial aspect of maintaining cultural identity. Can you think of potential consequences of this?
Losing historical buildings could affect our sense of identity and community belonging.
Exactly! That's why the process must be handled carefully and thoughtfully.
Challenges in Decision-Making
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
One challenge in Kiruna's relocation is the conflicting interests among stakeholders. Can someone explain this?
There seems to be confusion about who has the authority to make decisions.
And the financial aspect complicates things since moving large structures costs a lot.
Good point! How does that affect the community?
If it costs too much, some important places might get de-heritagised.
Yes, it's a delicate balance to maintain financial viability while preserving cultural heritage. This leads to longer-term impacts; anyone wants to suggest a solution?
Maybe involving the community more in discussions could help reach a consensus?
That's an excellent suggestion! Engaging the community ensures their voice is heard and valued.
Comparative Analysis
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Kiruna's approach to relocation is seen as thoughtful, especially when compared to some practices in South America. What differences can you identify?
In South America, they often just pay people to leave, without considering their needs.
Kiruna seems to take environmental impacts into account too, like animal grazing and local ecosystems.
Exactly! Kiruna's relocation process is sensitive to community dynamics. Why is this important?
It helps create a sustainable community that recognizes historical legacies.
Great insights! Understanding these differences helps us assess best practices in urban planning.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
The section delves into the intricacies of spatial planning in Kiruna, focusing on the roles of various stakeholders like LKAB, the municipal government, and the local community. It discusses the heritagisation process, including the recognition and relocation of heritage buildings, while addressing key conflicts and challenges arising during this transformative period.
Detailed
Spatial Planning Complexities
This section explores the spatial planning complexities associated with the relocation of the town of Kiruna, necessitated by mining activities. It highlights the multifaceted relationships between stakeholders, such as the state-owned LKAB mining company, the municipal administration (Kiruna Kommun), and the local population.
The discussion begins with the emotional and cultural significance of existing heritage buildings within Kiruna, emphasizing the reluctance to demolish them and the community's attachment to their environment. This is framed against Jennie Sjoholm's pivotal work, which aims to contextualize and comprehend the vast array of documents and reports emerging from institutions involved in the planning processes.
The section introduces the concept of 'heritagisation,' divided into three processes: heritagisation (recognizing and designating heritage), re-heritagisation (reaffirming the significance of existing heritage), and de-heritagisation (deciding which structures will be preserved or moved). The challenges of navigating these processes are underscored, particularly in relation to financial constraints posed by the relocation of major heritage buildings.
Moreover, the text elaborates on the relationships among the three main stakeholders and the confusion regarding responsibilities and decision-making authority, posing a significant challenge for effective spatial planning. The issues of uncertainty, future investment, and the interdependent nature of these relationships highlight the complexity of managing such a significant urban relocation.
Lastly, it contrasts Kiruna's approach to relocation with that of other countries, particularly in South America, where planning can be less considerate of local communities' needs. This offers a more ethically sound approach, considering the ecological impact and community welfare, emphasizing thoughtful spatial planning.
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Challenges of Demolition and Emotion
Chapter 1 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
Detailed Explanation
This chunk discusses the emotional implications of demolishing important buildings in a community. Specifically, it points out that tearing down buildings is not just a physical act but also affects people's feelings of belonging and attachment to their heritage. The connection individuals have with physical structures is tied to their identity and community.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a family home where childhood memories were made. If that house were to be demolished, it would not only be a loss of bricks and mortar but also a loss of shared experiences, traditions, and a sense of identity for the family.
Stakeholders in Kiruna
Chapter 2 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
And in fact there also to understand the Kiruna character and the belonging of it like you can see this is the LKAB company land, ... these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.
Detailed Explanation
In Kiruna, there are three primary stakeholders: LKAB (the state-owned mining company), the railway, and the Kiruna Kommun (the municipal government). Each of these entities has a role in the planning and redevelopment of the area. Understanding their relationships, responsibilities, and the effects they have on one another is crucial in addressing the complexities of spatial planning in Kiruna.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a school project where a team is tasked with building a garden. Each member has different skills: one is good at design, another at building, and another at planning the budget. If they don't work together and understand each other's roles, the project may fail.
Documentation and Conservation Analysis
Chapter 3 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
And a lot of documents a lot of heritage board there is lot of documents coming in Kiruna councils country administrative board, and LKAB ... and she tried to analyse you know what is the purpose of this whole document and how are they related to the conservation of these heritage buildings.
Detailed Explanation
This section highlights the extensive documentation surrounding the heritage buildings in Kiruna, including those from the council and various stakeholders. Jennie Sjoholm's work focuses on synthesizing this information to understand its significance for conserving heritage buildings, analyzing how these documents connect to community identity and the locality.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a historian studying a town’s archives to preserve its history. By piecing together various records, maps, and reports, they can present a richer narrative of the town's past, just as Jennie aims to do with the heritage documents of Kiruna.
Heritagisation Process
Chapter 4 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
And then in 1984 what you can see here is like it is all the red dots which are actually talking about the designated areas you know they are all the listed buildings ...
Detailed Explanation
The heritagisation process in Kiruna began with identifying important buildings and creating conservation plans in 1984. This involved recognizing new heritage sites and planning for their relocation due to the mining company's activities. The community’s acknowledgment of these sites signifies their importance in local culture and identity.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a historical site that is slated for demolition. Community members may come together to advocate for its preservation, creating a process that identifies and protects important heritage, similar to what happened in Kiruna.
Interdependencies Among Stakeholders
Chapter 5 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Now the people has a confusion who is going to take the move who is responsible for the move because whether it is a duty of the municipal administration ...
Detailed Explanation
This chunk addresses the confusion among the Kiruna community about who is responsible for the relocation process. It examines the complexities of decision-making among the three key stakeholders: the municipal administration, LKAB, and the local community. The uncertainty in roles and responsibilities can complicate planning efforts, leading to misunderstandings and lack of coordination.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a sports team where the coach, players, and management all have different ideas about game strategy. If they don't communicate effectively, they may end up undermining each other's efforts, just like the stakeholders could in Kiruna.
Temporal and Spatial Complexities
Chapter 6 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
Also the uncertainties, today yes we are planning for next 50 years we are preparing ourselves maybe after 50 years we may have to move to the next place ...
Detailed Explanation
This section highlights the temporal complexities associated with spatial planning. While long-term planning is essential, the unpredictability of external factors, like mining industry viability and technological advances, raises concerns. This uncertainty complicates decisions about investments and future planning for both the community and the stakeholders.
Examples & Analogies
Think about planning a family vacation a year in advance. You might choose a destination based on current trends, but unpredictable factors like weather or travel restrictions can affect your plans, much like the uncertainties faced in Kiruna's planning.
Comparative Approaches to Relocation
Chapter 7 of 7
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
So that is where I would like to brief you about this is how these are the challenges were involved ...
Detailed Explanation
In this point, the speaker emphasizes the thoughtful planning process undertaken in Sweden compared to other regions, such as South America, where relocations tend to be less considerate of community needs. This comparison highlights the importance of integrating community welfare and ecological considerations in spatial planning.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine two different cities responding to a natural disaster. One city may displace residents without consideration for their needs, while another may work to ensure families are settled into new homes close to schools and jobs, highlighting the importance of thoughtful community-focused planning.
Key Concepts
-
Comparative analysis: Kiruna's thoughtful approach contrasts sharply with other countries' practices, highlighting the importance of community involvement.
-
Complex stakeholder dynamics: The interconnected roles of LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the local community create a challenge in decision-making.
-
Heritagisation process: Understanding the phases of recognizing, reaffirming, and potentially deregistering heritage structures.
Examples & Applications
In 1984, a conservation plan was adopted for Kiruna, indicating designated areas and listed buildings.
The LKAB mining company plays a critical role in financial support for the relocation, creating dependency with local stakeholders.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
In Kiruna, mining takes the prize, with heritage under the skies.
Stories
Once there was a town called Kiruna, where the mines grew deep. The townsfolk cherished their old buildings, they were stories to keep. When the mines expanded, decisions became tough, should they stay with the past or move on, though it was rough?
Memory Tools
To remember the three stakeholders: 'K-L-C' for 'Kiruna, LKAB, Community.'
Acronyms
Heritage in Kiruna is H-R-D
Heritagisation
Re-heritagisation
De-heritagisation.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Heritagisation
The process of recognizing and designating buildings or sites as heritage, preserving their historical and cultural significance.
- Reheritagisation
The process of reaffirming the significance of previously designated heritage buildings, particularly in the context of relocation.
- Deheritagisation
The process by which certain buildings or sites lose their recognition as heritage, often leading to their demolition or neglect.
- Tripartite relationship
A relationship involving three interdependent parties, in this case, LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the local community.
- Stakeholders
Individuals or groups that have an interest in the planning and decision-making processes related to spatial planning.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.