2. Spatial Planning Complexities

We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.

This chunk discusses the emotional implications of demolishing important buildings in a community. Specifically, it points out that tearing down buildings is not just a physical act but also affects people's feelings of belonging and attachment to their heritage. The connection individuals have with physical structures is tied to their identity and community.

Consider a family home where childhood memories were made. If that house were to be demolished, it would not only be a loss of bricks and mortar but also a loss of shared experiences, traditions, and a sense of identity for the family.

And in fact there also to understand the Kiruna character and the belonging of it like you can see this is the LKAB company land, ... these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.

In Kiruna, there are three primary stakeholders: LKAB (the state-owned mining company), the railway, and the Kiruna Kommun (the municipal government). Each of these entities has a role in the planning and redevelopment of the area. Understanding their relationships, responsibilities, and the effects they have on one another is crucial in addressing the complexities of spatial planning in Kiruna.

Think of a school project where a team is tasked with building a garden. Each member has different skills: one is good at design, another at building, and another at planning the budget. If they don't work together and understand each other's roles, the project may fail.

And a lot of documents a lot of heritage board there is lot of documents coming in Kiruna councils country administrative board, and LKAB ... and she tried to analyse you know what is the purpose of this whole document and how are they related to the conservation of these heritage buildings.

This section highlights the extensive documentation surrounding the heritage buildings in Kiruna, including those from the council and various stakeholders. Jennie Sjoholm's work focuses on synthesizing this information to understand its significance for conserving heritage buildings, analyzing how these documents connect to community identity and the locality.

Imagine a historian studying a town’s archives to preserve its history. By piecing together various records, maps, and reports, they can present a richer narrative of the town's past, just as Jennie aims to do with the heritage documents of Kiruna.

And then in 1984 what you can see here is like it is all the red dots which are actually talking about the designated areas you know they are all the listed buildings ...

The heritagisation process in Kiruna began with identifying important buildings and creating conservation plans in 1984. This involved recognizing new heritage sites and planning for their relocation due to the mining company's activities. The community’s acknowledgment of these sites signifies their importance in local culture and identity.

Consider a historical site that is slated for demolition. Community members may come together to advocate for its preservation, creating a process that identifies and protects important heritage, similar to what happened in Kiruna.

Now the people has a confusion who is going to take the move who is responsible for the move because whether it is a duty of the municipal administration ...

This chunk addresses the confusion among the Kiruna community about who is responsible for the relocation process. It examines the complexities of decision-making among the three key stakeholders: the municipal administration, LKAB, and the local community. The uncertainty in roles and responsibilities can complicate planning efforts, leading to misunderstandings and lack of coordination.

Imagine a sports team where the coach, players, and management all have different ideas about game strategy. If they don't communicate effectively, they may end up undermining each other's efforts, just like the stakeholders could in Kiruna.

Also the uncertainties, today yes we are planning for next 50 years we are preparing ourselves maybe after 50 years we may have to move to the next place ...

This section highlights the temporal complexities associated with spatial planning. While long-term planning is essential, the unpredictability of external factors, like mining industry viability and technological advances, raises concerns. This uncertainty complicates decisions about investments and future planning for both the community and the stakeholders.

Think about planning a family vacation a year in advance. You might choose a destination based on current trends, but unpredictable factors like weather or travel restrictions can affect your plans, much like the uncertainties faced in Kiruna's planning.

So that is where I would like to brief you about this is how these are the challenges were involved ...

In this point, the speaker emphasizes the thoughtful planning process undertaken in Sweden compared to other regions, such as South America, where relocations tend to be less considerate of community needs. This comparison highlights the importance of integrating community welfare and ecological considerations in spatial planning.

Imagine two different cities responding to a natural disaster. One city may displace residents without consideration for their needs, while another may work to ensure families are settled into new homes close to schools and jobs, highlighting the importance of thoughtful community-focused planning.

--