3. Comparative Analysis

We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.

This chunk discusses the challenges associated with demolishing important buildings and constructing new ones. It emphasizes that this process is not straightforward and that it deeply affects people's emotions and their sense of belonging. Buildings are not just structures; they hold personal and collective memories for individuals and communities, making their demolition a sensitive issue.

Imagine a beloved childhood home being torn down to make way for new development. For many, that home represents their formative years and the memories held within its walls. The emotional impact of losing such a space can be profound, highlighting the importance of considering feelings of attachment when dealing with historical buildings.

And Jennie Sjoholm what she did was because in this particular point of time there is a huge jargon on you know who is doing what and there are many reports coming on reports and reports.

This chunk introduces Jennie Sjoholm's role in navigating complex reports and stakeholder dynamics. It points out that there are multiple overlapping interests from different entities, creating confusion regarding responsibilities and actions taken. The importance of understanding who is involved and their roles is crucial for managing the heritage conservation process in Kiruna.

Picture a group project at school where everyone has a different idea of what to do. Without clear communication and understanding of each person's responsibilities, the project could end up disorganized. Similarly, in heritage conservation, unclear roles can lead to conflict and inefficiency.

And in fact there also to understand the Kiruna character and the belonging of it like you can see this is the LKAB company land, and this is the Kiruna Kommun this is the service and the supply town and wherever the railway aspect is there this is the railway land, so you have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.

This chunk identifies three major stakeholders in the Kiruna area—LKAB (the mining company), the railway, and Kiruna Kommun (the municipal administration). Each stakeholder has its interest and impact on the land and buildings, creating a complex landscape of interactions that need to be managed carefully. Understanding their respective roles is crucial in determining how heritage conservation will proceed.

Think of a soccer team where each player has a different position and role. The goalkeeper protects the goal, defenders stop the other team from scoring, and forwards try to score. If the players don’t work together and understand their roles, the team won’t perform well. In Kiruna, the stakeholders must collaborate and understand each other's interests to effectively manage the town's heritage.

And a lot of documents a lot of heritage board there is lot of documents coming in Kiruna councils country administrative board, and LKAB and a lot of consultants which are developing all the reports but then Jennie what she did was she tried to really put together and she tried to analyse you know what is the purpose of this whole document and how are they related to the conservation of these heritage buildings.

This chunk discusses the extensive documentation and reports produced by various stakeholders related to heritage conservation. Jennie Sjoholm's efforts to analyze and synthesize these documents are crucial for understanding their collective purpose and relevance to preserving Kiruna's heritage buildings. This analytical work helps clarify the motives behind conservation actions.

Consider a puzzle where each piece represents a different document or report. At first glance, you can't see the full picture. However, once you start to piece them together, you gain a clearer understanding of what the final image represents. Similarly, Jennie's work helps interpret the collective goal behind all those reports.

And coming to the Heritagisation process I would like to emphasise on 3 important aspects one is a heritagisation, re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation.

In this chunk, the discussion moves to the different stages of the heritagisation process: heritagisation (establishing new heritage), re-heritagisation (reaffirming the importance of existing heritage), and de-heritagisation (removing heritage status from certain structures). Understanding these terms helps clarify the different approaches to managing heritage buildings during the relocation process.

Think of a library that acquires new books and regularly reassesses its collection. Heritagisation is when a new book is recognized as valuable, re-heritagisation is confirming a classic book's importance, and de-heritagisation might occur when an outdated book is removed from the shelf. This library analogy illustrates how the management of heritage works in practice.

So they have to take care of each and every shingle out, and carry it, and place it, and erect it. So this is going to cost few millions worth of project you know so then they try to assess the budget of it you know what kind of so after all taking care of the practical considerations.

This chunk sheds light on the economic factors influencing heritage conservation, particularly the financial costs associated with relocating structures. The meticulous nature of dismantling, preserving, and rebuilding heritage buildings often leads to high financial investments, which necessitate careful budget assessments and planning.

Imagine buying a vintage car. Restoring it to its original beauty involves significant time, care, and money, often exceeding initial expectations. Similarly, restoring heritage buildings requires substantial resources, and underestimating these costs can lead to financial strain.

Now the people has a confusion who is going to take the move who is responsible for the move because whether it is a duty of the municipal administration or Kommun administration or it is a duty of the their funding agent to who are actually the whole and soul mining institution LKAB.

This chunk describes the confusion surrounding responsibilities and decision-making regarding the relocation of heritage buildings. It highlights the complexities of temporal and spatial planning, as various entities may have overlapping or unclear jurisdictions, complicating the management of the move.

Consider a neighborhood planning a community event. If there are multiple organizations involved without clear roles, confusion can arise about who is in charge of what. Lack of clarity can lead to delays or chaos, just as the confusion among different authorities in the Kiruna relocation process can hinder effective action.

I hope this will help you in understanding the challenges in the relocation contexts.

In this concluding chunk, the speaker reflects on the thoughtful approach taken to address the challenges posed by the relocation, contrasting it with less considerate practices seen in other parts of the world. It emphasizes the importance of planning that takes into account not only human aspects but also environmental impacts, showcasing a comprehensive approach to heritage conservation.

Imagine relocating a zoo. A good relocation process considers not just the animals' needs but also the surrounding environment and community reactions. In the same way, when dealing with heritage conservation, taking a holistic approach ensures that all factors are considered, leading to more sustainable outcomes.

--