Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Let's discuss the key stakeholders in Kiruna's town relocation. We have the LKAB mining company, the Kiruna Kommun, and the residents. Why do you think each of these stakeholders matters?
I think the LKAB is important because they have the financial resources needed for the move.
Exactly! LKAB plays a crucial financial role. Can anyone tell me why Kiruna Kommun is equally important?
They manage local administration, so they connect the community with the project.
Great point! The Kommun’s role is to facilitate the relationship between the community and the mining company. Now, how about the residents?
The residents' lives will be affected the most since they have to deal with the emotional aspect of losing their heritage.
Yes, the emotional connection is significant. Remember the acronym 'KLR' for Kiruna's key stakeholders: K for Kommun, L for LKAB, and R for Residents. Each has a vital yet distinct role in this process.
To summarize, LKAB is the financial backbone, Kiruna Kommun manages local needs, and residents represent the emotional and cultural fabric of the community.
Can anyone explain what heritagisation means in the context of Kiruna?
It's about recognizing and preserving important buildings.
That's right! In 1984, a conservation plan initiated this process. What happens during re-heritagisation?
It involves reaffirming the importance of buildings that are currently recognized, especially with the move coming.
Excellent! Now, what can you tell me about de-heritagisation?
It’s when buildings are potentially removed from the heritage list, maybe because they are too costly to move.
Exactly. The processes of heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation introduce critical considerations in the relocation process. Remember the acronym 'HRD' for these three processes: H for heritagisation, R for re-heritagisation, and D for de-heritagisation.
In summary, understanding these concepts helps us navigate the complexities of heritage management in Kiruna effectively.
Let’s explore the emotional aspects of relocating heritage buildings. Why do these buildings hold such significance?
They have historical value and foster community identity.
Correct! They are part of the community's identity. Can anyone describe how this affects the decision-making process?
If people are emotionally attached, they might resist moving, which complicates negotiations.
Absolutely. Emotions can greatly influence decisions. To help remember this concept, think of 'HER' – Heritage, Emotion, Resistance. Each plays a role in the relocation discussion.
To summarize, the emotional impact of heritage buildings on communities must be considered carefully to facilitate a smoother relocation process.
What challenges do you think decision-makers face in the context of Kiruna's relocation?
There are financial costs involved, and they need to consider which buildings to preserve.
Right, balancing costs with heritage value presents a challenge. What about the role of the three stakeholders in decision-making?
There might be conflicts of interest between LKAB and the residents.
Exactly. This tripartite relationship makes it complex. Remember the acronym 'DCLR' for Decision-making: D for Decisions, C for Costs, L for LKAB, and R for Residents.
To summarize, decision-making during the relocation is multifaceted, requiring careful negotiation between all parties to ensure a respectful and beneficial outcome.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The section analyzes the intricate relationship between various stakeholders in Kiruna, such as LKAB, the municipal board, and the local community, while addressing the processes of heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation of heritage buildings as the town prepares for its relocation. The discussion highlights the emotional, cultural, and financial challenges involved in the move, alongside the importance of making thoughtful decisions regarding heritage conservation.
The section begins by outlining the emotional and cultural significance associated with the heritage buildings in Kiruna and the challenges involved in their demolition and relocation. Jennie Sjoholm’s analysis plays a crucial role in understanding the relationships between various stakeholders, including the LKAB mining company, the Kiruna Kommun, and the local communities.
In 1984, a conservation plan was adopted, leading to the designation of significant heritage sites and beginning a process called heritagisation, where new heritage sites were acknowledged and the importance of existing ones was reaffirmed. This is important because the town’s move raises questions about what aspects of history will be told and preserved, a topic that is a core point of contention among various stakeholders.
The section also discusses the concept of re-heritagisation, emphasizing how certain buildings' significance is being revisited in light of the planned relocations. As the logistics and financial costs involved in moving heritage structures come into play, the process of de-heritagisation becomes critical. This involves identifying which buildings will be maintained during the move or sacrificed for practical reasons.
The challenges of managing this relocation process involve a complex interplay of three main stakeholders: LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the residents who rely on the town’s economic stability. The final parts of the section delve into how these relationships create confusion and challenges in decision-making, highlighting the need for a well-organized plan as the project unfolds amidst uncertainties regarding the mining industry and its future.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
This chunk discusses the challenges associated with demolishing important buildings and constructing new ones. It emphasizes that this process is not straightforward and that it deeply affects people's emotions and their sense of belonging. Buildings are not just structures; they hold personal and collective memories for individuals and communities, making their demolition a sensitive issue.
Imagine a beloved childhood home being torn down to make way for new development. For many, that home represents their formative years and the memories held within its walls. The emotional impact of losing such a space can be profound, highlighting the importance of considering feelings of attachment when dealing with historical buildings.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And Jennie Sjoholm what she did was because in this particular point of time there is a huge jargon on you know who is doing what and there are many reports coming on reports and reports.
This chunk introduces Jennie Sjoholm's role in navigating complex reports and stakeholder dynamics. It points out that there are multiple overlapping interests from different entities, creating confusion regarding responsibilities and actions taken. The importance of understanding who is involved and their roles is crucial for managing the heritage conservation process in Kiruna.
Picture a group project at school where everyone has a different idea of what to do. Without clear communication and understanding of each person's responsibilities, the project could end up disorganized. Similarly, in heritage conservation, unclear roles can lead to conflict and inefficiency.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And in fact there also to understand the Kiruna character and the belonging of it like you can see this is the LKAB company land, and this is the Kiruna Kommun this is the service and the supply town and wherever the railway aspect is there this is the railway land, so you have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.
This chunk identifies three major stakeholders in the Kiruna area—LKAB (the mining company), the railway, and Kiruna Kommun (the municipal administration). Each stakeholder has its interest and impact on the land and buildings, creating a complex landscape of interactions that need to be managed carefully. Understanding their respective roles is crucial in determining how heritage conservation will proceed.
Think of a soccer team where each player has a different position and role. The goalkeeper protects the goal, defenders stop the other team from scoring, and forwards try to score. If the players don’t work together and understand their roles, the team won’t perform well. In Kiruna, the stakeholders must collaborate and understand each other's interests to effectively manage the town's heritage.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And a lot of documents a lot of heritage board there is lot of documents coming in Kiruna councils country administrative board, and LKAB and a lot of consultants which are developing all the reports but then Jennie what she did was she tried to really put together and she tried to analyse you know what is the purpose of this whole document and how are they related to the conservation of these heritage buildings.
This chunk discusses the extensive documentation and reports produced by various stakeholders related to heritage conservation. Jennie Sjoholm's efforts to analyze and synthesize these documents are crucial for understanding their collective purpose and relevance to preserving Kiruna's heritage buildings. This analytical work helps clarify the motives behind conservation actions.
Consider a puzzle where each piece represents a different document or report. At first glance, you can't see the full picture. However, once you start to piece them together, you gain a clearer understanding of what the final image represents. Similarly, Jennie's work helps interpret the collective goal behind all those reports.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
And coming to the Heritagisation process I would like to emphasise on 3 important aspects one is a heritagisation, re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation.
In this chunk, the discussion moves to the different stages of the heritagisation process: heritagisation (establishing new heritage), re-heritagisation (reaffirming the importance of existing heritage), and de-heritagisation (removing heritage status from certain structures). Understanding these terms helps clarify the different approaches to managing heritage buildings during the relocation process.
Think of a library that acquires new books and regularly reassesses its collection. Heritagisation is when a new book is recognized as valuable, re-heritagisation is confirming a classic book's importance, and de-heritagisation might occur when an outdated book is removed from the shelf. This library analogy illustrates how the management of heritage works in practice.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
So they have to take care of each and every shingle out, and carry it, and place it, and erect it. So this is going to cost few millions worth of project you know so then they try to assess the budget of it you know what kind of so after all taking care of the practical considerations.
This chunk sheds light on the economic factors influencing heritage conservation, particularly the financial costs associated with relocating structures. The meticulous nature of dismantling, preserving, and rebuilding heritage buildings often leads to high financial investments, which necessitate careful budget assessments and planning.
Imagine buying a vintage car. Restoring it to its original beauty involves significant time, care, and money, often exceeding initial expectations. Similarly, restoring heritage buildings requires substantial resources, and underestimating these costs can lead to financial strain.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Now the people has a confusion who is going to take the move who is responsible for the move because whether it is a duty of the municipal administration or Kommun administration or it is a duty of the their funding agent to who are actually the whole and soul mining institution LKAB.
This chunk describes the confusion surrounding responsibilities and decision-making regarding the relocation of heritage buildings. It highlights the complexities of temporal and spatial planning, as various entities may have overlapping or unclear jurisdictions, complicating the management of the move.
Consider a neighborhood planning a community event. If there are multiple organizations involved without clear roles, confusion can arise about who is in charge of what. Lack of clarity can lead to delays or chaos, just as the confusion among different authorities in the Kiruna relocation process can hinder effective action.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
I hope this will help you in understanding the challenges in the relocation contexts.
In this concluding chunk, the speaker reflects on the thoughtful approach taken to address the challenges posed by the relocation, contrasting it with less considerate practices seen in other parts of the world. It emphasizes the importance of planning that takes into account not only human aspects but also environmental impacts, showcasing a comprehensive approach to heritage conservation.
Imagine relocating a zoo. A good relocation process considers not just the animals' needs but also the surrounding environment and community reactions. In the same way, when dealing with heritage conservation, taking a holistic approach ensures that all factors are considered, leading to more sustainable outcomes.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Heritagisation: The process of recognizing buildings as significant parts of cultural heritage.
Re-heritagisation: The reaffirmation of heritage importance amidst changes such as relocation.
De-heritagisation: The removal of buildings from heritage lists for practical reasons during relocation.
Stakeholders: Key players involved in the relocation process (LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, residents).
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The relocation of the Kiruna Church is a practical example where financial considerations come into play, weighing heritage against the cost of relocating.
Jennie Sjoholm's analysis highlights the various stakeholder perspectives on heritage preservation emphasizing the diverse views on what should remain and what could be compromised.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
To save our buildings, cherish their worth, in Kiruna's heart, they greet their birth.
Imagine a town filled with history, where the buildings tell stories of the past. As they prepare to move, the people reflect on their significance and hope they carry their memories to the new location.
Remember 'HRD' for Heritage, Re-heritage, De-heritage to keep the processes in mind.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Heritagisation
Definition:
The process of recognizing and preserving significant cultural heritage buildings.
Term: Reheritagisation
Definition:
The process of reaffirming the importance of buildings that are part of the cultural heritage as circumstances change.
Term: Deheritagisation
Definition:
The act of potentially removing buildings from the designated heritage list based on various logistical considerations.
Term: Stakeholders
Definition:
Individuals or groups that have an interest or concern in the relocation project, such as LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and local residents.
Term: Tripartite relationship
Definition:
A system of governance involving three distinct but interconnected parties, in this case, LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the residents.