Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we need to start discussing the Conservation Plan of 1984. This plan was vital for ensuring Kiruna's heritage buildings were respected while the town was set to move due to mining. Can anyone summarize why we might have to relocate a town like Kiruna?
Because mining activities can make the land unsafe or unusable, right?
Exactly! And this brings us to some key stakeholders involved, such as LKAB and the Kiruna Kommun. What do you think the role of these stakeholders might be?
LKAB likely wants to ensure the mining continues profitably, while the Kommun wants to maintain the community's heritage.
That's perfect! The needs of both need to be balanced carefully.
Now, let's dive deeper into the term 'heritagisation'. Can anyone explain what it means?
I think it's about recognizing certain buildings or areas as significant culturally or historically.
Correct! It also refers to the processes of re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation, which are crucial when planning how heritage structures are treated during relocation. How do you think these processes can impact local identity?
If we affirm and reinterpret heritage, it helps maintain cultural continuity, but de-heritagisation might lead to loss of identity.
Well said! Maintaining local identity is a significant concern during such transitions.
Let’s talk about decision-making. Why is it challenging in the context of Kiruna's relocation?
Because there are multiple stakeholders with different interests, like LKAB wanting profit over history.
Absolutely! This tripartite relationship often leads to confusion about responsibilities. What do you think is a possible solution to this problem?
Maybe clearer communication and defined roles could help?
Exactly! Clear roles can reduce confusion and empower stakeholders to work together efficiently.
Now, let’s explore the specific challenges in the relocation planning process. What complexities do you think might arise?
Weather conditions can make it hard to plan; different times of the year could impact how we move buildings.
Great observation! Also, coordinating the move while considering resources and community needs can be challenging. What do you think about the environmental impact?
Considering grazing grounds and ecosystems is crucial during such a significant relocation.
Exactly! These considerations show a more holistic approach to conservation.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
This section details the Conservation Plan of 1984, highlighting the identified stakeholders and the conflicting interests in preserving Kiruna's heritage. It touches on the heritagisation process, the complications of moving essential heritage structures, and the implications of decisions made by various stakeholders, especially in the context of local culture and history.
The Conservation Plan adopted in 1984 serves as a framework for preserving the cultural and historical essence of Kiruna amid its planned relocation due to mining activities. Key stakeholders involved in this process include LKAB, the state-owned mining company, the Kiruna Kommun (municipality), and the local railway. Each entity has unique interests and responsibilities which complicate the overall decision-making process.
The section introduces Jennie Sjoholm, who analyzed documents from various heritage boards and the Kiruna council to unravel the intentions underlying these reports. The plan encompasses concepts such as heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation. It aims to establish a balance between recognizing new heritage elements and affirming the significance of existing ones.
Important discussions arise around the relocation of heritage structures, especially in context of Kiruna's historical narrative and future identity. There were controversial decisions regarding which heritage buildings to retain or relocate, encompassing practical considerations such as cost and construction methods. The interplay of local history, stakeholder relationships, and environmental considerations distinctively frames this unique conservation effort.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
This chunk emphasizes the significance of heritage buildings within a community. It suggests that demolishing these structures is not trivial; they hold emotional and cultural value for the people. When you take away buildings that have historical meaning, it affects individuals' sense of belonging and identity.
Consider a family home where generations have lived. If someone were to demolish it for new construction, the family would feel a deep sense of loss because of the memories and connections tied to that house. Similarly, heritage buildings carry memories for the entire community.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
You have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna: the railway, the LKAB state-owned mining company, and the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.
In Kiruna, there are three main stakeholders involved: the railway system, which is vital for transportation; LKAB, a state-owned mining company that plays a significant economic role; and Kiruna Kommun, the municipal government responsible for service delivery to the community. Understanding the roles of these stakeholders is crucial as they influence the conservation and relocation processes.
Think of a school project where you have different groups responsible for various tasks: one group researches, another creates presentations, and a third organizes logistics. Each group's role is essential for the project's success, just like these three stakeholders in Kiruna.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In 1984 what you can see here is like it is all the red dots which are actually talking about the designated areas, which are all the listed buildings around, and there is a conservation plan which has been adopted in 1984.
The 1984 Conservation Plan marked an important step in recognizing and protecting distinct building sites in Kiruna, illustrated on a map with red dots. This plan aimed to preserve the architectural heritage of the town in light of impending changes due to mining activities.
Imagine a city that decides to protect its historical sites because they represent its identity, similar to how a family might establish rules to keep heirlooms safe. The adoption of the 1984 plan was Kiruna's way of safeguarding its heritage despite future developments.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In her work, Jennie Sjoholm analyzed the purpose of the whole document and how they are related to the conservation of these heritage buildings... heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation.
Jennie Sjoholm's analysis focused on the concept of heritagisation, which refers to recognizing buildings as heritage worth preserving. Re-heritagisation involves reaffirming the importance of already identified heritage sites as their status changes, while de-heritagisation may occur when certain buildings no longer hold the same significance. This process is critical during relocation efforts and ensures that important cultural narratives continue.
Consider how a community might celebrate specific landmarks during a festival, reaffirming their importance each year. However, if some landmarks fall into disrepair and no longer represent the community's values, the community might decide they need to focus more on the ones that do, similar to the processes defined by Sjoholm.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There have been a lot of the controversial aspects of how this particular culture has going to be taken into account in the move process.
The relocation of heritage buildings to accommodate mining operations raises controversial issues. It engages various stakeholders with different opinions on how history will be portrayed and which aspects of Kiruna’s culture should be preserved. The debate centers on balancing modern progress with historical integrity.
When a town decides to change its main street's layout, residents might disagree on which shops should remain or what the street should look like. Similarly, in Kiruna, the community must navigate differing viewpoints on which cultural aspects to retain when relocating buildings.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Conservation Plan of 1984: A framework for preserving heritage amidst relocation due to mining.
Stakeholders: Entities with vested interests in the planning and execution of the relocation.
Heritagisation processes: Methods of recognizing, interpreting, and managing cultural significance.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
The relocation of Kiruna Church, which will be a significant challenge due to its historical importance and potential costs involved.
The addition of new heritage sites reflecting modern developments while maintaining historical context.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
Save the past, as we move fast; Kiruna's tales, through time prevails.
Imagine a town slowly uprooting its history, yet preserving its heart while venturing into a new world. Kiruna is like that town, facing challenges but embracing its legacy as it moves forward.
Remember the RHD: Re-heritagisation, Heritage preservation, and De-heritagisation, crucial in Kiruna's planning.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Heritagisation
Definition:
The process of recognizing and emphasizing certain elements of culture or history as significant.
Term: Reheritagisation
Definition:
The process of reaffirming the significance of already designated heritage as part of local culture.
Term: Deheritagisation
Definition:
The removal or rejection of previously designated heritage, often due to practical reasons.
Term: Stakeholder
Definition:
An individual or group with an interest or concern in a particular issue, in this context, related to heritage and relocation.
Term: Municipal Board (Kommun)
Definition:
A local authority responsible for managing municipal affairs, including community services and planning.