1 - Introduction to Kiruna's Heritage
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Interactive Audio Lesson
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Introduction to Heritagisation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Heritagisation is the process of recognizing certain buildings or sites as important to a culture. In Kiruna, the conservation plan from 1984 identified many significant buildings. Can anyone give me an example of a notable building in Kiruna?
Isn't the Kiruna Church one of the important ones?
Exactly! The Kiruna Church is a great example. It holds significant cultural relevance. Can anyone describe why emotional connections to these buildings matter?
Because they represent our history and community identity!
Precisely! Buildings like Kiruna Church embody stories and memories. Remember, 'HERITAGE' helps us sum this up. H for history, E for emotions, R for recognition, I for identity, T for tradition, A for architecture, G for genealogy, E for experience.
Got it! So, heritagisation really connects to our roots and keeps our stories alive.
Well said! To summarize, heritagisation connects us to our past and helps in the recognition of places that are vital for future generations.
Stakeholders in Kiruna's Heritage
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Now, let’s delve into the various stakeholders involved in Kiruna's heritage preservation. Who can name some of these stakeholders?
There’s LKAB, the mining company, right?
And the Kiruna Kommun, which is the municipal board!
Exactly! LKAB, as a state-owned company, has financial responsibilities, whereas Kiruna Kommun takes care of administrative support. Can anyone tell me why understanding their roles is essential?
If we know what they do, we can see how decisions can impact the community and heritage!
Spot on! This relationship is complicated. To remember it, think of the acronym 'TLC' – T for tension, L for local communities, C for collaboration. Stakeholders must work together despite their differences.
That’s really helpful! Collaboration sounds crucial.
Indeed. In summary, recognizing stakeholders like LKAB and Kiruna Kommun is key to understanding heritage conversations and the conflicts involved.
Practical Considerations in Heritage Relocation
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
As we consider relocating heritage buildings, what do you think some practical issues might arise?
Costs could be a major concern!
Absolutely! The costs of disassembling and moving buildings can be very high. Jennie Sjoholm talks about how some buildings might not be worth relocating. Have any of you experienced a similar situation in your community?
Yes! Our town had to tear down an old hall because it was too expensive to fix.
Exactly! Sometimes buildings can't be preserved because of costs or feasibility. To remember these factors, use 'C.A.P.' – Costs, Accessibility, Practical considerations. It sums up our dilemma!
Nice! I'll remember that.
In summary, relocation poses financial and logistical challenges that we must carefully manage to preserve our heritage.
Future of Kiruna's Heritage
🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson
Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson
Finally, let's discuss what the future might hold for Kiruna's heritage. What uncertainties do we face?
Will the mining operations affect the buildings still standing?
Good point! There's always uncertainty in mining. Additionally, the investments in new technologies might not guarantee success. Anyone know an analogy to explain this concept?
Like planting a seed and not knowing if it will grow because of unpredictable weather!
Exactly! That’s a perfect analogy. To keep this in mind, think of the '4 W's': What will happen? Who will decide? When will changes happen? Where will the community go? These questions help guide our understanding of the future.
Those are great guiding questions!
In summary, looking forward, we must remain vigilant and proactive regarding the challenges and uncertainties Kiruna's heritage faces.
Introduction & Overview
Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.
Quick Overview
Standard
This section delves into the heritage of Kiruna, highlighting the challenges of moving historical buildings, the roles of various stakeholders, and the processes of heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation. It emphasizes the emotional and cultural importance of preserving history while adapting to modern demands.
Detailed
Detailed Summary
This section elaborates on Kiruna's rich cultural heritage and the challenges faced during its relocation due to mining operations by the LKAB state-owned company. As Kiruna undergoes significant transformation, Jennie Sjoholm's work emphasizes understanding emotions tied to the heritage buildings and how different stakeholders—like LKAB, the municipality (Kiruna Kommun), and railways—play crucial roles in this process.
Key aspects discussed include:
- Heritagisation: The formal recognition of heritage sites, illustrated by the 1984 conservation plan that included identification and designation of significant buildings.
- Re-heritagisation: Acknowledging existing heritage items, reaffirming their significance during the relocation process, where some buildings were prioritized for preservation.
- De-heritagisation: The process of removing or downgrading certain heritage classifications, reflecting practical considerations such as costs involved in building preservation versus relocation.
- Stakeholder Dynamics: A detailed exploration of the tripartite relationship between LKAB, the municipal board, and the local community, highlighting tensions in decision-making regarding who should fund and manage the relocation efforts.
- Future Considerations: The uncertainty surrounding investments in advanced technologies for potential future relocations, as well as the consideration of ecological impacts and local livelihoods.
Through this discussion, the text captures the emotional ties people have with their heritage and the complexities involved in balancing preservation with modern development needs.
Youtube Videos
Audio Book
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Importance of Kiruna's Heritage
Chapter 1 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
Detailed Explanation
This chunk introduces the core issue surrounding Kiruna's heritage: the challenge of demolishing significant buildings. These buildings are not just structures; they are infused with the history and emotions of the community. Therefore, the process of losing them can emotionally impact the residents, creating a need for careful management of these changes.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a family deciding to sell their childhood home. For them, it's not just a house; it's filled with memories of birthdays, holidays, and milestones. The emotional weight makes the decision very difficult, similar to the feelings Kiruna's residents have toward their historic buildings.
Key Stakeholders in Kiruna
Chapter 2 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
LKAB company land, Kiruna Kommun, and the railway land are the major stakeholders of Kiruna.
Detailed Explanation
The section identifies three key stakeholders in Kiruna's ongoing transformation: the state-owned mining company LKAB, the local government (Kiruna Kommun), and the railway system. Each has a significant role in the town's operations and future development, creating a complex landscape of interests that need to be balanced.
Examples & Analogies
Think of a school project where students have to work in groups. Each group member has different ideas and priorities about how to complete the project. Just like in Kiruna, the stakeholders need to collaborate and listen to each other in order to achieve a successful project outcome.
Heritage Documentation and Conservation Plans
Chapter 3 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
In 1984, a conservation plan was adopted in Kiruna, focusing on the addition and relocation of heritage buildings.
Detailed Explanation
This chunk presents a historical overview of Kiruna's conservation efforts memorialized with the establishment of a conservation plan in 1984. This plan aimed to document significant structures, provide guidelines for their preservation, and address how to relocate them due to the town’s expansion.
Examples & Analogies
Consider a city that puts together a plan to preserve its historic downtown area. The city leaders create guidelines on which buildings to preserve and how to incorporate modern infrastructure, ensuring that the town retains its character while also accommodating growth.
The Processes of Heritagisation
Chapter 4 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
The processes of heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation suggest a complex narrative around valuing heritage.
Detailed Explanation
Here, the discussion revolves around three processes that influence how heritage is perceived and managed: heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation. 'Heritagisation' relates to the act of recognizing something as heritage, 're-heritagisation' involves updating or changing the significance of existing heritage, and 'de-heritagisation' can mean deciding that certain elements are no longer considered heritage.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a museum deciding to feature a new exhibit on pop culture. That could be seen as heritagisation since it recognizes the role of pop culture in society. If they later realize that some items aren’t relevant, they might choose to de-heritagise those items, removing them from the exhibit.
Challenges of Relocation in Kiruna
Chapter 5 of 5
🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter
Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience
Chapter Content
There have been complexities in the spatial planning practice and theory regarding the relocation of the town.
Detailed Explanation
This section highlights the challenges faced in planning the relocation of Kiruna. These include logistical complexities, financial considerations, and uncertainty about the future, reflecting the difficulties of managing a significant urban change while trying to preserve history.
Examples & Analogies
Imagine a family needing to move to a new city. They must plan how to transport their belongings, possibly sell some items, and deal with the emotional toll of leaving their home. Similarly, Kiruna must consider how to move its historic structures while tackling numerous challenges.
Key Concepts
-
Heritagisation: The formal process of recognizing buildings and sites as culturally significant.
-
Re-heritagisation: Reaffirming the importance of previously recognized heritage.
-
De-heritagisation: The downgrading of a cultural site's importance.
-
Stakeholder dynamics: The interactions and relationships among various parties involved in heritage decisions.
Examples & Applications
The Kiruna Church is an example of a building undergoing heritagisation, representing cultural and emotional ties to the community.
In Kiruna, the complexity of moving buildings like the Town Hall highlights the intersection of costs and emotional heritage.
Memory Aids
Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts
Rhymes
Heritage bright, buildings so tight, stories we tell, keep memories well.
Stories
Imagine a town where buildings hold secrets of old; moving them means losing stories that never unfold.
Memory Tools
Remember 'HERITAGE': History, Emotions, Recognition, Identity, Tradition, Architecture, Genealogy, Experience.
Acronyms
Use 'TLC' for Stakeholders - Tension, Local communities, Collaboration.
Flash Cards
Glossary
- Heritagisation
The process of formally recognizing a site or building as important to cultural heritage.
- Reheritagisation
The acknowledgment and reaffirmation of existing heritage items in light of new contexts.
- Deheritagisation
The process of downgrading or removing the cultural significance of a heritage item.
- Stakeholders
Individuals or organizations with an interest or concern in a particular issue or project.
- Conservation Plan
A strategic framework designed to protect and preserve important heritage buildings.
Reference links
Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.