3.1. Differences in Relocation Approaches

We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.

This chunk highlights the significance of preserving heritage buildings during the relocation process. It suggests that demolishing these buildings is not just a logistical decision; it affects people's emotions and their sense of belonging in the community. Hence, it's essential to consider how such actions can impact the local identity and emotional connections of residents.

Think of a family home that holds generations of memories. If the family has to leave that home, it’s not just about the physical space; it represents their history and connections. Similarly, in towns, heritage buildings symbolize the community’s identity.

you have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.

In Kiruna, the relocation process involves three major stakeholders: the railway company, LKAB (the state-owned mining company), and the Kiruna Kommun (municipality). Each of these entities has a significant role in the relocation process, as they contribute financially, administratively, and socially to the planning and execution of the move.

Imagine a school fundraising event where teachers, parents, and students all play different roles. The teachers plan the event, parents provide resources, and students help with logistics. Just like in this scenario, each stakeholder in Kiruna has a distinct responsibility that is crucial for the success of the relocation.

And here the heritagisation have actually referred to various aspects; one is the addition of new heritage because when they came to know that yes the Kiruna is going to move further.

The term 'heritagisation' refers to the process by which certain buildings or areas are recognized as heritage due to their historical value. In Kiruna, as relocation plans emerged, there was a push to identify and preserve new heritage sites alongside established ones, reflecting changes in community identity and recognizing the need to safeguard important structures during the move.

Think of a town deciding to celebrate a new park that was built to preserve nature. As new developments come in, communities often designate new landmarks or parks as heritage sites, acknowledging their significance to the community's history and culture.

Let us see how it went, and there have been a lot of the controversial aspects of how this particular culture has going to be taken into account in the move process.

The relocation process in Kiruna involves controversies regarding how different cultural aspects are considered. The decision on which buildings are preserved or relocated raises debates about the narrative of history that will be told in the future. This reflects a struggle between maintaining heritage and the realities of modern development.

Consider a community voting on which historical site to preserve while a new shopping mall is built. Some may want to save the old community center, believing it’s an essential piece of their history, while others may prioritize the development of new infrastructure. This tension encapsulates the dilemmas faced during heritage management.

One is a heritagisation, re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation.

In Kiruna, three processes are recognized concerning heritage: heritagisation (designating buildings as heritage), re-heritagisation (emphasizing the importance of buildings previously designated as heritage), and de-heritagisation (deciding certain buildings no longer hold heritage value). Understanding these processes helps clarify how the community navigates decisions about heritage during relocation.

Imagine a college that has a building designated as a historical site. Over the years, as new structures emerge, students might decide the old building isn't fit for use anymore (de-heritagisation), but then a new group of alumni advocates to preserve it for its historical significance (re-heritagisation). This cycle reflects how communities often reevaluate what is deemed important.

So that is where they started looking at the last stage of in a more practical way of how we can deal with these certain buildings, you know so the de-heritagisation process have started.

As the relocation progresses, decision-makers often face practical challenges at the final stage, specifically regarding which buildings can be moved or preserved. This uncertainty can complicate the planning process, as financial considerations and heritage assessments weigh against urgent time constraints and logistical needs.

When a family decides to move, they often find themselves having to sort through their belongings. They might struggle with whether to take their old couch (heritage) or buy a new one due to the cost and space limitations in a new home (de-heritagisation). This reflects the practical challenges faced by communities during relocation.

So there is always a tripartite relationship with these 3 stakeholders.

In Kiruna, the relationship among the LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the local community exhibits interdependence, with each stakeholder relying on the others for support. This complex dynamic can often lead to confusion about responsibilities and decision-making authority in the relocation efforts.

Consider a sports team where the players depend on coaches for strategy and the audience for support. If the players and coaches disagree on how to approach a game, the team's performance can suffer. Similarly, the interdependent relationships in Kiruna can lead to challenges if the stakeholders do not align on relocation goals.

--