1.5. De-heritagisation

We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.

This chunk discusses the emotional significance of heritage buildings, which represent the history and identity of a community. Demolishing such buildings is not just a physical act; it affects people's feelings and sense of belonging. It highlights the complex relationship between built heritage and community identity.

Think of a family heirloom, like a grandfather's old watch. If someone were to throw it away, it’s not just a waste of an item; it erases memories and connections to family history, making everyone feel a sense of loss.

And Jennie Sjoholm what she did was because in this particular point of time there is a huge jargon on you know who is doing what and there are many reports coming on reports and reports. And in fact there also to understand the Kiruna character and the belonging of it like you can see this is the LKAB company land, and this is the Kiruna Kommun this is the service and the supply town and wherever the railway aspect is there this is the railway land, so you have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.

This chunk identifies three main stakeholders in Kiruna: the LKAB mining company, the Kiruna Kommun (municipality), and the railway. Each has a role in the decision-making process regarding heritage buildings and community planning. The mention of 'jargon' indicates that there may be confusion or complexity in understanding their respective roles and responsibilities.

Imagine a school project where students have to decide on a field trip. The students (community) want a fun trip, the teachers (municipality) want to ensure it’s educational, and the parents (mining company) have a budget limit that needs to be respected. Each group has different priorities that need to be aligned.

And here the heritagisation have actually referred to various aspects; one is the addition of new heritage because when they came to know that yes the Kiruna is going to move further. And then there is a relocation aspect which has been planned out for these heritage buildings because apart from the reconstruction aspect they are also talking about the relocation of these heritage buildings.

This chunk introduces the concept of heritagisation where, as Kiruna prepares to relocate, new heritage sites are recognized. This includes not only identifying heritage buildings but also planning to relocate them instead of demolishing them, emphasizing the importance of preserving history even amidst change.

Think about moving to a new house. If you have family photos and important items that carry memories, you wouldn’t just leave them behind. Instead, you’d want to carefully pack them and take them along to your new home, preserving those memories.

And finally this whole media jargon is very different and interpretations are very different at the end of the day the decision makers come onto the board looking at the financial cost how much it is going to cost to move that Kiruna Church or the Town Hall, a Kiruna Church, for example, ... they have to take care of each and every shingle out, and carry it, and place it, and erect it.

This chunk highlights the process of de-heritagisation, where financial considerations may outweigh the heritage value of certain buildings. Decision-makers might decide not to move every heritage building, explicitly stating that the costs involved can be significant, as is the case with the Kiruna Church.

Imagine a beloved pet that has become too expensive to care for due to rising costs. Though the pet is loved, people may feel compelled to consider their financial limits when making decisions, much like the decisions around moving heritage buildings.

In fact, if you look at it there is a LKAB which is a state-owned mining company and the Kiruna kommun which is a municipal board and where is the local communities the people who are actually relying on the town...

This chunk delves into the complex relationships between LKAB, Kiruna Kommun, and the local communities, noting that confusion exists about responsibility for the move. This highlights the interdependence of various stakeholders and the complexities in decision-making processes, adding layers to the challenge of managing heritage.

Think of a sports team where the coach (LKAB) wants to win at all costs while the players (local communities) want to enjoy the game and play safely. Each has different motivations, which can lead to conflict over priorities and decisions.

What I really appreciate in this process is Sweden unlike in many countries in South America when they are moving some towns or some Hamlets because of the mining issues...

This chunk contrasts Sweden’s approach to relocating towns with methods used in other countries, specifically mentioning that in Sweden, there is a more thoughtful and inclusive process concerning the impact on both people and wildlife, showcasing a commitment to social and environmental responsibility.

Think of a community garden. Instead of just bulldozing it to build a parking lot, the local council holds meetings with residents to find a way to incorporate the garden into their plans. This represents a thoughtful approach to change that recognizes the value of community resources.

--