Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.
Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.
Enroll to start learning
You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.
Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.
Today, we are discussing the concept of re-heritagisation. Can anyone tell me what they think that term means?
Is it about recognizing and preserving heritage sites?
Exactly! It's about reassessing the value of heritage sites, especially when circumstances require change, such as moving buildings in Kiruna due to mining. What emotional connections can arise from such buildings?
People might feel sad to see them go because they represent their history.
That’s very true. These buildings can symbolize community identity, making their relocation a sensitive topic. Let's remember with the acronym 'HERITAGE' which stands for 'Historical Emotions Relating to Identity Through Architecture, Generational Experience.'
Now, let's discuss the key stakeholders in the re-heritagisation process in Kiruna. Who are they?
I think there's the LKAB mining company, right?
That's right. LKAB is crucial as they financially support the relocation efforts. Who else?
The Kiruna Kommun, the town's administration, is also involved.
Perfect! And what about the people?
The local community is affected and plays a role in deciding what to preserve.
Exactly! We remember the relationship with the mnemonic 'K-L-P'—'Kommun, Local people, LKAB.'
Let’s explore the 1984 conservation plan and its implications for heritage buildings. What do you think the plan achieved?
It listed buildings that are important to preserve.
Correct! This 'listing' is part of our re-heritagisation efforts. Can anyone think of further steps that could happen after listing?
Maybe they could reinterpret some buildings' significance or even reject certain buildings from the list.
Exactly! Such actions reflect changing values toward heritage. Remember, ‘RESTORE’ stands for 'Reaffirm, Engage, Sustain, Transcend, Oversee, Recognize, and Evolve.'
Let’s now address the challenges involved in stakeholder relationships during this process. Why might there be confusion among them?
They might not know who is responsible for decisions about moving buildings.
Very insightful! This uncertainty can hinder effective action. What do we remember about the relationships, based on our earlier discussion?
LKAB has financial power, while the Kommun has the administrative side but the community's input is crucial too.
That’s correct! Remember the acronym 'CAP'—'Communities Affect Planning.' It highlights how stakeholders must engage for successful re-heritagisation.
Finally, let’s look at future planning. What elements should be considered for sustainability during relocation?
They should consider the environmental impact on animals and habitats.
Right! It’s essential to think about ecosystems as part of the plan. How can we remember the pillars of sustainability?
I think 'E-S-E' works—'Environmental, Social, Economic.'
Excellent! This summary of approaches will guide our future discussions on managing changes to heritage sites.
Read a summary of the section's main ideas. Choose from Basic, Medium, or Detailed.
The text discusses the concept of re-heritagisation as it relates to the relocation and preservation of heritage structures in Kiruna. It highlights the involved parties, the nuances of heritage designation, and the societal impacts of these changes, emphasizing the need for thoughtful planning amid competing interests.
In this section, we delve into the notion of re-heritagisation in Kiruna, which refers to the processes undertaken to recognize and preserve heritage structures amidst the relocation necessitated by mining activities. Initial discussions reveal the frustrations regarding the demolition of crucial buildings and the emotional resonance connected to these heritage sites. Jennie Sjoholm’s research is pivotal in synthesizing extensive documentation from various stakeholders, including LKAB, the Kiruna Kommun, and various heritage boards. Her work underscores the importance of understanding the jargon in these conversations.
In 1984, a conservation plan was established, designating key heritage buildings and areas. It highlights three aspects of heritage processes: the addition of new heritage, reaffirmation of existing heritage, and the reinterpretation and potential rejection of previously designated areas. As the town of Kiruna prepares for a move, the community and stakeholders grapple with how to preserve the historical narrative of the site while addressing modern needs.
The section also discusses the complexities of stakeholder relationships, particularly between LKAB, the city administration, and the local residents. It raises questions about decision-making authority and seeks to address the uncertainties surrounding future planning and investment. The analysis reflects on the unique Swedish approach to relocation compared to other countries, emphasizing a more considerate approach towards community needs and ecological considerations.
Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
We cannot, it is not easy to demolish these important buildings and then we are going to construct a new set of image because it is to play with the peoples emotions peoples belonging.
This chunk introduces the concept of re-heritagisation by discussing the emotional significance of historic buildings. Demolishing these structures is not merely a physical action; it deeply impacts the community's sense of belonging and identity. The effort to build something new isn't just about construction but about respecting and understanding the emotional ties people have to their environment.
Consider a family home that has been passed down through generations. If the city decides to tear it down for new development, the family may feel a profound loss, as that house represents their history, memories, and identity. Similar feelings arise when important community buildings are threatened.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
You have these 3 are the major stakeholders of the Kiruna one is the railway the other one is the LKAB state-owned mining company and the other one is the Kiruna Kommun to serve the people.
In Kiruna, three main stakeholders—railway interests, the state-owned mining company LKAB, and the municipal administration (Kiruna Kommun)—play crucial roles in the heritage conservation process. Each stakeholder has specific interests and responsibilities, which can sometimes conflict with each other. Understanding these dynamics is essential to comprehend the challenges in managing heritage during urban relocation.
Imagine a school where three organizations each want to use the playground: the school wants it for recess, a local sports team wants it for practice, and the city wants to develop it into a park. Each group's interests must be negotiated to find a solution that considers everyone's needs, much like how Kiruna navigates stakeholder relationships.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
A lot of documents a lot of heritage board there is a lot of documents coming in Kiruna councils country administrative board, and LKAB and a lot of consultants which are developing all the reports.
This chunk discusses the extensive documentation and numerous reports generated by various stakeholders in Kiruna. These documents are crucial for understanding the heritage context and ensure that all voices and viewpoints are considered in the conservation process. They represent a complex interplay of regulations, guidelines, and heritage value assessments.
Think of a group project in school where everyone contributes different pieces of information. Each member's research needs to be compiled into a final report. Just like in the project, where each contribution is vital, the documents produced by multiple agencies help shape the heritage conversation in Kiruna.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
In 1984...the heritagisation have actually referred to various aspects; one is the addition of new heritage...the relocation aspect which has been planned out for these heritage buildings.
The heritagisation process began formally in 1984 with the establishment of a conservation plan. This involved recognizing new dimensions of heritage, particularly concerning buildings that were to be relocated due to the town's changes. The process emphasizes the importance of including previously unrecognized buildings as part of the historical narrative.
Imagine a library that is moving to a new location. In this process, the library may choose to add new sections that highlight forgotten elements of the community's past. Similarly, Kiruna identified buildings that had historical significance which were previously overlooked in the conservation efforts.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
There have been a lot of the controversial aspects of how this particular culture has going to be taken into account in the move process.
This chunk highlights the controversies surrounding the heritagisation process. Different stakeholders may have conflicting ideas about which aspects of culture and history should be preserved during the move. This can lead to debates over what constitutes important heritage and how to interpret the town's past.
Consider a town trying to decide which historic buildings to preserve. Some citizens may want to save the old theater, while others might argue for the importance of the city hall. This disagreement mirrors the tensions present in Kiruna, where various interpretations of heritage are at play.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
Re-heritagisation that is where Jennie calls it as re-heritagisation.
Re-heritagisation refers to the process of reassessing and recognizing the importance of certain heritage elements in light of new circumstances. In Kiruna, as buildings are relocated, there is a reevaluation of their significance and a concerted effort to ensure they are honored in the community’s new context.
Think about updating a family tree as more relatives are discovered. As you locate new information about ancestors, their importance in your family history may be redefined. Kiruna’s re-heritagisation similarly updates the understanding of cultural heritage as the landscape changes.
Signup and Enroll to the course for listening the Audio Book
The de-heritagisation process have started and that is where they come up with about 12 Black horn buildings...
The de-heritagisation process involves deciding which buildings will no longer be considered significant enough to warrant preservation. In Kiruna, this process involved identifying certain structures, such as the 12 Black Horn buildings, deemed less essential for conservation.
Imagine a museum that decides to rotate out certain exhibits to make room for new ones. While it may be hard for some to see beloved exhibits removed, it allows for new highlights and perspectives. Similarly, Kiruna must make tough choices about what to preserve and what can be let go.
Learn essential terms and foundational ideas that form the basis of the topic.
Key Concepts
Heritagisation: The process of recognizing and preserving heritage.
Re-heritagisation: Reevaluating the importance of designated heritage, especially during changes.
Stakeholders: Key individuals or groups involved in the heritage conservation process.
Conservation plans: Strategies for protecting heritage sites.
De-heritagisation: Removing a building's heritage status.
See how the concepts apply in real-world scenarios to understand their practical implications.
In Kiruna, heritage buildings have been designated for preservation due to their historical significance to the community.
The relocation of the Kiruna Church involved serious consideration of its structural integrity and cultural importance.
Use mnemonics, acronyms, or visual cues to help remember key information more easily.
In Kiruna, heritage speaks, with memories that it seeks, young or old, all agree, heritage stays, it's key!
In a village named Kiruna, the townsfolk discovered that their beloved church would be moved, so they gathered to celebrate its history. They shared stories of the church's first services, reminding each other of the connections they had to their town’s heritage.
Use 'CAP' - Communities Affect Planning, to remember how stakeholder involvement is crucial.
Review key concepts with flashcards.
Review the Definitions for terms.
Term: Reheritagisation
Definition:
The process of reevaluating and reasserting the significance of heritage structures, especially amid change, such as relocation.
Term: Stakeholders
Definition:
Entities or individuals with an interest in the heritage sites, including government bodies, corporations, and local communities.
Term: Conservation Plan
Definition:
A documented strategy outlining the preservation of designated heritage buildings and sites.
Term: Designated Heritage
Definition:
Buildings or sites recognized for their historical, cultural, or architectural significance.
Term: Deheritagisation
Definition:
The process of removing heritage designation from a site or structure.
Term: Urban Relocation
Definition:
The process of moving an entire community or town due to external pressures such as industrialization.