Numerical Methods for Solving Inverse Kinematics - 10.7 | 10. Forward and Inverse Kinematics | Robotics and Automation - Vol 1
Students

Academic Programs

AI-powered learning for grades 8-12, aligned with major curricula

Professional

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design

Games

Interactive Games

Fun games to boost memory, math, typing, and English skills

Numerical Methods for Solving Inverse Kinematics

10.7 - Numerical Methods for Solving Inverse Kinematics

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Practice

Interactive Audio Lesson

Listen to a student-teacher conversation explaining the topic in a relatable way.

Introduction to Numerical Methods

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Today we're discussing numerical methods for solving inverse kinematics. Why do you think we need numerical methods instead of just analytical solutions?

Student 1
Student 1

I think analytical solutions are sometimes too complex or can't be found for certain manipulator configurations.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! Complex robots, especially with many joints, often have non-linear equations that are tough to solve analytically. That's where numerical methods come in. Let’s talk about the first method: Newton-Raphson.

Newton-Raphson Method

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

The Newton-Raphson method approximates the solution by linearizing the problem. Does anyone remember the update rule?

Student 2
Student 2

It's something like q equals q plus the Jacobian-inverse times the difference between the desired position and the current one, right?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Correct! This method converges quickly near the solution. It's great for small adjustments. However, what do we need for it to work effectively?

Student 3
Student 3

A good initial guess!

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! A poor guess can lead the method to fail. Now, let’s discuss the Gradient Descent method.

Gradient Descent Method

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

The Gradient Descent method is different; instead of iterating toward a solution, it minimizes the cost function. Can anyone summarize the form of the cost function?

Student 4
Student 4

I think it was E(q) equals half the norm squared of the difference between f(q) and the desired position!

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Great memory! Although it’s slower than Newton-Raphson, it's often more stable. When would you consider using Gradient Descent over Newton-Raphson?

Student 1
Student 1

Maybe when we're far from the solution, and we want to avoid instability?

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! Let’s wrap up by looking at the Damped Least Squares method.

Damped Least Squares Method

🔒 Unlock Audio Lesson

Sign up and enroll to listen to this audio lesson

0:00
--:--
Teacher
Teacher Instructor

The Damped Least Squares method helps tackle singularities in the robot's configuration. What do you think happens to the Jacobian in such cases?

Student 2
Student 2

It becomes non-invertible or close to it, which makes it hard to find a solution.

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Exactly! So, the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm incorporates damping to stabilize the calculations. Can anyone summarize how damping helps?

Student 3
Student 3

It prevents the algorithm from going off track by introducing a factor that adjusts the step size!

Teacher
Teacher Instructor

Great summary! It balances speed and stability, which is vital in these scenarios.

Introduction & Overview

Read summaries of the section's main ideas at different levels of detail.

Quick Overview

This section discusses numerical methods used to solve inverse kinematics problems when analytical solutions are not feasible.

Standard

Inverse kinematics can be complex for certain robotic structures, leading to the need for numerical methods such as iterative techniques like Newton-Raphson and Gradient Descent. These methods provide alternative ways to find joint parameters that achieve desired end-effector poses, especially in the presence of singularities and redundancy.

Detailed

Numerical Methods for Solving Inverse Kinematics

Inverse kinematics (IK) is crucial to control a robot's movement accurately. However, analytical solutions can be challenging for complex structures. Therefore, numerical methods come into play. This section introduces three primary numerical techniques:

Iterative Methods

  1. Newton-Raphson Method: This method linearizes non-linear kinematic equations with an update rule:

$$q_{i+1} = q_i + J^{-1}(q_i)(X_d - f(q_i))$$
It converges quickly when close to a solution but relies on a good initial guess.

  1. Gradient Descent Method: Instead of linearizing equations, this method minimizes the cost function:

$$E(q) = rac{1}{2}||f(q) - X_d||^2$$
While it converges more slowly than the Newton-Raphson approach, it is stable in difficult scenarios.

  1. Damped Least Squares (Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm): To manage singularities, this method adds damping:

$$ riangle q = (J^T J + λ I)^{-1} J^T (X_d - f(q))$$
It balances speed and stability, making it effective for many IK scenarios.

Pseudo-Inverse Jacobian Approach

In cases where the Jacobian matrix is non-square or singular, the pseudo-inverse is used:

$$J^+ = J^T (J J^T)^{-1}$$
The joint velocities are estimated with:

$$ar{q} = J^+ ar{X}$$
This approach is commonly applied in redundant manipulators, where more degrees of freedom exist than are needed for a task.

Youtube Videos

Inverse Kinematics (with solved example) | Planar RRP robot | Robotics 101
Inverse Kinematics (with solved example) | Planar RRP robot | Robotics 101
Inverse Kinematics of Robots | Robotics 101
Inverse Kinematics of Robots | Robotics 101
Teaching a robot some hand-eye coordination…
Teaching a robot some hand-eye coordination…
Robot Leg Control using Python and ROS
Robot Leg Control using Python and ROS
Inverse Kinematics of Robots - Learn Automation and Robotics
Inverse Kinematics of Robots - Learn Automation and Robotics
Computing Inverse Kinematics using Numerical Methods | Robotic Systems
Computing Inverse Kinematics using Numerical Methods | Robotic Systems
What Is the Difference Between Forward and Inverse Kinematics in Robotics?
What Is the Difference Between Forward and Inverse Kinematics in Robotics?
Modern Robotics, Chapter 6.2:  Numerical Inverse Kinematics (Part 1 of 2)
Modern Robotics, Chapter 6.2: Numerical Inverse Kinematics (Part 1 of 2)
Mastering Robot Arm Movements  Forward and Inverse Kinematics
Mastering Robot Arm Movements Forward and Inverse Kinematics
Numerical Methods: Solving Inverse Kinematics of Planar Robotic Arm
Numerical Methods: Solving Inverse Kinematics of Planar Robotic Arm

Audio Book

Dive deep into the subject with an immersive audiobook experience.

Overview of Numerical Methods

Chapter 1 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

Analytical solutions are not always feasible for complex robotic structures. Hence, numerical methods are employed.

Detailed Explanation

In robotics, especially for complex structures, finding exact solutions (analytical solutions) can be very difficult or impossible. Therefore, we use numerical methods, which employ iterative calculations to approximate solutions. These methods can find joint angles that will achieve a given position for the robot’s end effector effectively.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine trying to solve a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have a picture to guide you. Instead, you try out different pieces (like testing joint angles) one by one until you find a combination that works. Numerical methods are like this trial-and-error approach, helping you find the right arrangement.

Iterative Methods

Chapter 2 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

  1. Newton-Raphson Method:
  2. Linearizes the non-linear kinematic equations.
  3. Update rule:
    $$q =q+J^{-1}(q)(X−f(q))$$
  4. Converges quickly near the solution but requires good initial guess.
  5. Gradient Descent Method:
  6. Minimizes the cost function:
    $$E(q)= rac{1}{2} \|f(q)−X \|^{2}$$
  7. Slower than Newton-Raphson but more stable in some cases.
  8. Damped Least Squares (Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm):
  9. Handles singularities by adding damping:
    $$Δq=¿$$
  10. Offers a balance between speed and stability.

Detailed Explanation

Iterative methods are techniques used to approximate solutions over successive iterations. The Newton-Raphson method focuses on linearizing the kinematic equations and updating guesses based on how far off the current guess is from the desired output. The Gradient Descent method, on the other hand, reduces a defined error value step by step until a minimum is reached, making it stable and reliable, albeit slower. The Damped Least Squares method helps navigate situations where traditional methods struggle by adding an element of control to maintain convergence, especially near challenging configurations.

Examples & Analogies

Think of it like climbing a hilly path to reach the top of a mountain (the solution). The Newton-Raphson method is like taking big, confident steps towards the peak, but it can stumble if you start too far off course. Gradient Descent is more like taking careful, smaller steps, ensuring you don’t overreach and slip. Damped Least Squares is akin to using hiking poles for stability to help keep you upright when the path gets rocky.

Pseudo-Inverse Jacobian Approach

Chapter 3 of 3

🔒 Unlock Audio Chapter

Sign up and enroll to access the full audio experience

0:00
--:--

Chapter Content

When the Jacobian is not square or invertible, use:
$$J^{+}=??$$
- The joint velocities are estimated using:
$$q˙=J^{+}X˙$$
- Common in redundant manipulators.

Detailed Explanation

The Pseudo-Inverse Jacobian is a technique used when the Jacobian matrix derived from the robot’s kinematics cannot be inverted directly due to the robot having more joints than necessary for the given task (redundant manipulator). The pseudo-inverse allows us to still calculate joint velocities that correspond to the desired velocity of the end effector, facilitating smoother and more controlled movement even in complex situations.

Examples & Analogies

Imagine trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Sometimes, it just won't fit! The Pseudo-Inverse Jacobian approach is like using a flexible material that can adapt and stretch into the proper shape, allowing the joint movements to adjust to achieve the desired position without forcing it, just like creating a tailored fit for a specific scenario.

Key Concepts

  • Numerical Methods: Techniques for calculating solutions numerically when analytical solutions are difficult or impossible.

  • Newton-Raphson Method: An efficient iterative method that converges to solutions by linearization.

  • Gradient Descent Method: A method that minimizes cost functions, slower but often more stable.

  • Damped Least Squares: An expansion of least squares that incorporates damping to manage singularities.

Examples & Applications

Using the Gradient Descent method to minimize the error between the desired joint angles and the actual angles of a robotic arm.

Applying the Damped Least Squares method to successfully control a robotic arm while avoiding singularities during movement.

Memory Aids

Interactive tools to help you remember key concepts

🎵

Rhymes

Newton-Raphson finds with speed, if close to a point, it’s what you need.

📖

Stories

Imagine a robot trying to reach a target. The Newton-Raphson method works quickly if it starts near, while Gradient Descent might take longer for further targets but is more stable.

🧠

Memory Tools

N for Newton, G for Gradient—two methods to optimize when robots communicate!

🎯

Acronyms

DLS for Damped Least Squares shows stability and control when things feel rough.

Flash Cards

Glossary

Inverse Kinematics (IK)

The computation of joint parameters that achieves desired positions and orientations of a robot's end-effector.

Numerical Methods

Approaches used to solve mathematical problems numerically, especially when analytical solutions are complex or unavailable.

NewtonRaphson Method

An iterative method for finding roots of real-valued functions by linearizing them.

Gradient Descent Method

An optimization algorithm used to minimize a cost function iteratively.

Damped Least Squares

An optimization algorithm that adds damping to regularized least squares to handle singularities and instability.

Jacobian Matrix

A matrix that relates the rate of change of the output of a function to the rate of change of its input.

PseudoInverse Jacobian

An extension of the Jacobian used when it is not square or invertible, allowing for generalized calculations of joint velocities.

Reference links

Supplementary resources to enhance your learning experience.