Practice Based on Size - 3.1.1 | 3. Aggregates for Concrete | Concrete Technology
K12 Students

Academics

AI-Powered learning for Grades 8–12, aligned with major Indian and international curricula.

Professionals

Professional Courses

Industry-relevant training in Business, Technology, and Design to help professionals and graduates upskill for real-world careers.

Games

Interactive Games

Fun, engaging games to boost memory, math fluency, typing speed, and English skills—perfect for learners of all ages.

3.1.1 - Based on Size

Enroll to start learning

You’ve not yet enrolled in this course. Please enroll for free to listen to audio lessons, classroom podcasts and take practice test.

Learning

Practice Questions

Test your understanding with targeted questions related to the topic.

Question 1

Easy

What size qualifies as fine aggregates?

💡 Hint: Think about the maximum size.

Question 2

Easy

Name one example of coarse aggregates.

💡 Hint: Consider commonly used materials in concrete.

Practice 4 more questions and get performance evaluation

Interactive Quizzes

Engage in quick quizzes to reinforce what you've learned and check your comprehension.

Question 1

What defines fine aggregates?

  • Greater than 4.75 mm
  • Less than 4.75 mm
  • Exactly 4.75 mm

💡 Hint: Remember the sieve test for these aggregates.

Question 2

True or False: Coarse aggregates help with the compressive strength of concrete.

  • True
  • False

💡 Hint: Think about the structural role of aggregates.

Solve 1 more question and get performance evaluation

Challenge Problems

Push your limits with challenges.

Question 1

Given a concrete mix that requires 600 kg of aggregates with a 75:25 ratio of coarse to fine aggregates, how much of each type should be used?

💡 Hint: Apply the ratio to the total weight.

Question 2

Critically analyze a situation where using all-in aggregates might be preferred over separate fine and coarse aggregates.

💡 Hint: Consider the impact of efficiency on project timelines.

Challenge and get performance evaluation